NOTE IMDb
6,3/10
30 k
MA NOTE
Dans le centre-ville de Madrid, un coup de feu et deux morts mystérieuses amènent un groupe hétéroclite à se réfugier dans un bar central. La paranoïa monte : les clients terrifiés vont se r... Tout lireDans le centre-ville de Madrid, un coup de feu et deux morts mystérieuses amènent un groupe hétéroclite à se réfugier dans un bar central. La paranoïa monte : les clients terrifiés vont se retourner les uns contre les autres.Dans le centre-ville de Madrid, un coup de feu et deux morts mystérieuses amènent un groupe hétéroclite à se réfugier dans un bar central. La paranoïa monte : les clients terrifiés vont se retourner les uns contre les autres.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 19 nominations au total
Mariano Andrés
- Hombre 2
- (as Mariano Andres)
Avis à la une
An intense survival thriller that starts small and evolves into monstrous look at the dark side of humanity.
When 2 customers of a bar in Madrid are shot down as they leave suspicion lies behind all the eyes of the remaining customers, recriminations abound and who if any of them is responsible?
A very adept look at human paranoia and the depths a person will go to to save themselves.
Neither a comedy or a horror as some reviews I've read here interpret the film as but a tense, claustrophobic thriller that deserves a much higher rating than it currently has.
Seen at the Berlinale 2017. Turns out to be a knockout competition, something like And Then There Were None (aka Ten Little N****rs) by Agatha Christie. Since the whodunit becomes clear after 15 minutes, further proceedings are very different from said book in all respects, except for the fact that someone dies at regular intervals. Key question: How far will you go to save yourself at the expense of others, especially when those others are strangers. And is the choice very different when it involves someone who nauseated you at first sight, or had some prejudice against for whatever reason?? We see it all happening, in many variations, in this tense thriller. There are a few comedy elements to alleviate the tension from time to time, but the depressing core conclusion is that humans are self-serving by definition, and only care for others when they expect to get something in return.
The starting point is nothing out of the ordinary. A random collection of people, most of them strangers to one another, who happened to pass by and came into the bar for a variety of reasons. They suddenly find themselves against a common but initially unknown enemy. Our religious upbringing taught us that everyone is basically good, and prepared to help others in need. But our natural attitude changes in reverse as soon as we feel threatened. So this becomes the very opposite of a "All for one, one for all" story. Of the most remarkable observations in this movie is how drastically people change when they get hold of a loaded gun. We see that a few times, each time with other people, but the net effect is similar for all of them, even for people who we thought to be above sheer egoism.
There is no need to spoil what is going on and what will happen after that. Trust me that subsequent events are unpredictable, and makes one wonder if even a single one of the bar visitors will survive. And to test your own conscience: if there would be one survivor, who would you prefer to be the lucky one, versus who would you consider not worth living any further and better die in the process?? Prepare yourself for a very tense 1h45min. The whole running time is full of surprises. There is no time to consult your watch, as not a single minute is wasted. The final question is left for the viewer: would you have behaved much better than anyone in this group??
The starting point is nothing out of the ordinary. A random collection of people, most of them strangers to one another, who happened to pass by and came into the bar for a variety of reasons. They suddenly find themselves against a common but initially unknown enemy. Our religious upbringing taught us that everyone is basically good, and prepared to help others in need. But our natural attitude changes in reverse as soon as we feel threatened. So this becomes the very opposite of a "All for one, one for all" story. Of the most remarkable observations in this movie is how drastically people change when they get hold of a loaded gun. We see that a few times, each time with other people, but the net effect is similar for all of them, even for people who we thought to be above sheer egoism.
There is no need to spoil what is going on and what will happen after that. Trust me that subsequent events are unpredictable, and makes one wonder if even a single one of the bar visitors will survive. And to test your own conscience: if there would be one survivor, who would you prefer to be the lucky one, versus who would you consider not worth living any further and better die in the process?? Prepare yourself for a very tense 1h45min. The whole running time is full of surprises. There is no time to consult your watch, as not a single minute is wasted. The final question is left for the viewer: would you have behaved much better than anyone in this group??
Movie is a hilarious wanna be thriller that couldn't decide if it wants to make us laugh or anticipate how the story will evolve! The movie tries to be serious at some point but fails gloriously! Overall, good choice for a non-sense night!
The movie seemed decent for a while, but just got worse and worse to extremely silly in the sewer-scenes(even started fast-forwarding during the last 20 minutes), and then it ended without any answers given.
Mediocre acting. Plot decent, but nothing new. Bianca Suarez was hot.
5/10
Mediocre acting. Plot decent, but nothing new. Bianca Suarez was hot.
5/10
A committee wanted to make a movie. So there you have it. Conspiracy theory. And survival drama. And horror chase. And each member made its movie. And there was none to make an ending.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOne of the films that appear in the TV while the people in the bar look for the news is William Castle's House on Haunted Hill (1959), a film in which strangers are trapped in a (supposedly) haunted house. In The Bar, the strangers are trapped in a bar. Another coincidence is the number of people: in The Bar, there are nine people inside the building. In House on Hauted Hill, there are five guests, but counting the hosts and servants, there are also nine people inside the building.
- ConnexionsFeatures La Nuit de tous les mystères (1959)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Bar?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 134 248 € (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 3 662 671 $US
- Durée
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant