NOTE IMDb
6,6/10
27 k
MA NOTE
Les ados Zach et Josh sont meilleurs amis depuis toujours, mais un terrible accident entraîne un secret qui sème la discorde entre eux et les plonge dans un monde de paranoïa et de violence.Les ados Zach et Josh sont meilleurs amis depuis toujours, mais un terrible accident entraîne un secret qui sème la discorde entre eux et les plonge dans un monde de paranoïa et de violence.Les ados Zach et Josh sont meilleurs amis depuis toujours, mais un terrible accident entraîne un secret qui sème la discorde entre eux et les plonge dans un monde de paranoïa et de violence.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 4 victoires et 5 nominations au total
Philip H. Ashley
- Chad
- (as Philip Hackworth Ashley)
Olympia Nicole
- Girl #1
- (as Nicole Emmons)
Avis à la une
It's always impressive to see a young actor really shine, and the two best friends this movie centers around certainly deliver in their performances. Unfortunately, the ending leaves me wanting...more? Not necessarily, I don't have a problem with open ended stories, but the ending scene being about a character I didn't really connect with or care for was an odd choice. Maybe on a re-watch I'll catch some nuance that steers me in the direction of revelation with the ending scene...but is it really worth watching again? It certainly does capture the precell phone nineties teen vibes well, and there's a the surreal feeling of a town where we never see anyone else except the teens. It certainly speaks for the tunnel vision you have at the age.
I wish the set dressers would decorate my house for Christmas.
Worth watching overall.
I wish the set dressers would decorate my house for Christmas.
Worth watching overall.
If you like an indie flavor & are a fan of films like River's Edge or Stand By Me then you should have some fun with this one.
The storytelling is rich and engaging with suspenseful paranoia & is accompanied by some shocking imagery. The characters are entertaining & well conceived so it matters to the viewer when events unfold around them.
I can't fault this film for anything but I settle on a 7 rating because like most true crime narratives it is forced to borrow from its influences, which seem to be called upon throughout.
The storytelling is rich and engaging with suspenseful paranoia & is accompanied by some shocking imagery. The characters are entertaining & well conceived so it matters to the viewer when events unfold around them.
I can't fault this film for anything but I settle on a 7 rating because like most true crime narratives it is forced to borrow from its influences, which seem to be called upon throughout.
What a totally enjoyable 'under the radar' film.
Tragic events well acted by the young cast, and a very believable scenario.
An unlucky accident just spirals and moves at exactly the right pace. Never too sensational. Never too gory. And you can't help but feel moved by the inevitability of the story.
Sharp. Succinct. Well acted. Well made. Great script. LOVED IT!
Tragic events well acted by the young cast, and a very believable scenario.
An unlucky accident just spirals and moves at exactly the right pace. Never too sensational. Never too gory. And you can't help but feel moved by the inevitability of the story.
Sharp. Succinct. Well acted. Well made. Great script. LOVED IT!
Saw this at the Rotterdam film festival 2017 (website: iffr.com). The synopsis on the festival website contained ample pointers to avoid this movie, for example "life revolves around vying for popularity, hanging out, falling in love and looking for kicks". Luckily there was only little attention for partying, courting, clothes, and more such, unlike other movies covering youngsters of high-school age. The real drama took some time to develop, but once becoming apparent it stayed in the forefront, and so should it be.
A bit problematic (for me) is that the finale went a bit too fast and too bloody for my taste, something that did not follow logically from what happened before. It seemed a bit over the top. On the other hand, a different ending was not easy to think of, as involving the police and the legal system would have ruined the story completely. Moreover, it would require bringing in the parents of our main protagonists, which usually does not bode well for the clarity of the drama. Anyway, unexpected turns of events came at a steady pace and without weak moments, one step after another. The role of the female college students was less cultivated, as if they were only background tapestry, or maybe serving as catalyst material to speed up developments but otherwise not really crucial for the outcome.
Unclear is the opening scene where a deer is found dead in the class room with a broken window. It took some time before the police entered, who started exchanging glances with each other, but I'm at a loss what it all meant.
From the final Q&A I learned a nice statement: "planting little seeds here and there is the essence of script writing". And also: Rhythm and pacing are important (it was a side answer to a question about the sound track, but even more applying to the screenplay).
Also from the Q&A: A serious attempt was made to give Josh more dimensions in his character. Same for the others, though they did not need it that much. All were nice young men without really bad habits, but only nice is not enough to keep our interest.
All in all, I was glad to have booked tickets for this movie, despite my fears that it was to become another coming-of-age story with too much time devoted on courting and partying. This time there were no problems along that line. It sustained a real focus on the central story and its pacing of subsequent developments. The audience awarded this movie a mediocre 73rd place (out of 172) with an average score of 3.905 *out of 5).
A bit problematic (for me) is that the finale went a bit too fast and too bloody for my taste, something that did not follow logically from what happened before. It seemed a bit over the top. On the other hand, a different ending was not easy to think of, as involving the police and the legal system would have ruined the story completely. Moreover, it would require bringing in the parents of our main protagonists, which usually does not bode well for the clarity of the drama. Anyway, unexpected turns of events came at a steady pace and without weak moments, one step after another. The role of the female college students was less cultivated, as if they were only background tapestry, or maybe serving as catalyst material to speed up developments but otherwise not really crucial for the outcome.
Unclear is the opening scene where a deer is found dead in the class room with a broken window. It took some time before the police entered, who started exchanging glances with each other, but I'm at a loss what it all meant.
From the final Q&A I learned a nice statement: "planting little seeds here and there is the essence of script writing". And also: Rhythm and pacing are important (it was a side answer to a question about the sound track, but even more applying to the screenplay).
Also from the Q&A: A serious attempt was made to give Josh more dimensions in his character. Same for the others, though they did not need it that much. All were nice young men without really bad habits, but only nice is not enough to keep our interest.
All in all, I was glad to have booked tickets for this movie, despite my fears that it was to become another coming-of-age story with too much time devoted on courting and partying. This time there were no problems along that line. It sustained a real focus on the central story and its pacing of subsequent developments. The audience awarded this movie a mediocre 73rd place (out of 172) with an average score of 3.905 *out of 5).
A brilliant directorial debut by Kevin Philips. From the opening shot itself, the super dark mood is created in this film set in the mid-90s. A lot is communicated using visuals and incidents that aren't directly related to the main plot which solidifies the atmosphere of the film. Owen Campbell lives and breathes as Zach, even his inhaling and exhaling was so perfect for the character at each particular moment. But the third act was not a well-written part of the film where the characters act upon motivations that feel rushed without proper transition and ends up like a lot of other films.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAccording to Kevin Phillips, the opening scenes involving the deer getting put down in the cafeteria were based on an urban legend that occurred in his school in Pennsylvania.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Horrible Reviews: Best Movies I've Seen In 2023 (2024)
- Bandes originalesSadie
Performed by Bitch Magnet
Written by Sooyoung Park, Jon Fine and Orestes Morfin
Courtesy of Temporary Residence Ltd
By arrangement with Bank Robber Music
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Super Dark Times?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Очень тёмные времена
- Lieux de tournage
- Kingston, New York, États-Unis(Location)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 33 109 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 19 328 $US
- 1 oct. 2017
- Montant brut mondial
- 33 109 $US
- Durée1 heure 43 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Super Dark Times (2017) officially released in India in English?
Répondre