NOTE IMDb
3,0/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Un étudiant à court d'argent qui commence à travailler de nuit dans un musée soupçonne que l'une des expositions, une poupée vintage effrayante nommée Robert, est vivante et fait des ravages... Tout lireUn étudiant à court d'argent qui commence à travailler de nuit dans un musée soupçonne que l'une des expositions, une poupée vintage effrayante nommée Robert, est vivante et fait des ravages après les heures de travail.Un étudiant à court d'argent qui commence à travailler de nuit dans un musée soupçonne que l'une des expositions, une poupée vintage effrayante nommée Robert, est vivante et fait des ravages après les heures de travail.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Suzanne Dallaway
- Jenny Otto
- (as Suzie Frances Garton)
Avis à la une
A young woman takes a job on the night shift in a small curio museum. When her coworkers' bodies begin piling up, the prime suspect is one of the displays, a hideous doll which is purported to be possessed.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Robert The Doll (2015) was a weak messy British horror so I was hugely surprised to see it spawn a sequel. Wait did I say sequel? I meant sequels, because at time of writing there are no less than four Robert movies.
Now for those of you unfamiliar Robert is based upon a real doll, a doll that inspired the existence of Childs Plays own Chucky. But make no mistake these movies are not on the same level, not even remotely.
What I find odd is that they don't use the real Roberts appearance because that is considerably scarier. Seriously, it's like a cabbage patch doll imitating leather face!
Well Robert The Doll is fresh off his last killing spree and is now an exhibit in a museum. It's not l.ong until he returns to his old ways and it comes down to the buildings security guards and newly recruited cleaner to save the day.
To it's credit it does remain consistent and even includes a cast member from the original. Sadly this doesn't make up for everything else being beyond awful.
The Good:
Meh
The Bad:
Pretty much everything
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
I still struggle to find a doll even remotely feasible
I need alcohol if I'm going to weather the next two films
Now for those of you unfamiliar Robert is based upon a real doll, a doll that inspired the existence of Childs Plays own Chucky. But make no mistake these movies are not on the same level, not even remotely.
What I find odd is that they don't use the real Roberts appearance because that is considerably scarier. Seriously, it's like a cabbage patch doll imitating leather face!
Well Robert The Doll is fresh off his last killing spree and is now an exhibit in a museum. It's not l.ong until he returns to his old ways and it comes down to the buildings security guards and newly recruited cleaner to save the day.
To it's credit it does remain consistent and even includes a cast member from the original. Sadly this doesn't make up for everything else being beyond awful.
The Good:
Meh
The Bad:
Pretty much everything
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
I still struggle to find a doll even remotely feasible
I need alcohol if I'm going to weather the next two films
I must start out with a warning of sorts. Don't lured in by this movie, which obviously just cashes in on the success of "Annabelle".
The storyline in this movie was pointless and really uneventful.
The characters were essentially one-dimensional cardboard cut outs that you don't care about or invest any energy in.
The doll itself looked like something that was made by someone in primary school. And it was painstakingly clear that all the scenes with the doll was just some person holding it and moving its arms or legs. it was all so very, very low key.
This low budget horror movie is not worth the time or effort. I actually sat through it to the end but drifted off two or three times along the way. And I actually found myself with my attention on the phone a lot throughout the course of the snoozefest that is "The Curse of Robert the Doll".
The storyline in this movie was pointless and really uneventful.
The characters were essentially one-dimensional cardboard cut outs that you don't care about or invest any energy in.
The doll itself looked like something that was made by someone in primary school. And it was painstakingly clear that all the scenes with the doll was just some person holding it and moving its arms or legs. it was all so very, very low key.
This low budget horror movie is not worth the time or effort. I actually sat through it to the end but drifted off two or three times along the way. And I actually found myself with my attention on the phone a lot throughout the course of the snoozefest that is "The Curse of Robert the Doll".
This film is just as the title says, LAME!
As soon as the actor/actress spoke the first line, I knew what I was in for. Depression.
The scariest part of the film was a 5p plastic bag moving across the corridor. I would have had more fun with a dose of clap.
Please, for your mental health, do not even entertain the idea of watching this poor excuse of a movie.
As soon as the actor/actress spoke the first line, I knew what I was in for. Depression.
The scariest part of the film was a 5p plastic bag moving across the corridor. I would have had more fun with a dose of clap.
Please, for your mental health, do not even entertain the idea of watching this poor excuse of a movie.
A very slight improvement over the first film. But I mean slight. The action shifts to the modern day, where Robert's now a museum exhibit, except of course he's still up to no good. The acting's still cringy but not quite so much, and the inspiration seems to be CHILD'S PLAY which gives this one more of a slasher film feel.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn the real life case Robert Eugene Otto (Gene) was first given Robert the Doll in 1906, when he was just six years old, by an angry Bahamian servant with an interest in black magic and voodoo. It was rumored that the gift was the servant's revenge for being mistreated by the Otto family. Eugene Otto kept Robert by his side until his death in 1974. It is rumored that Otto's wife, Anne, was driven insane by her husband's lifelong devotion to the doll.
- ConnexionsFollowed by The Toymaker (2017)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Curse of Robert the Doll?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 19 096 $US
- Durée
- 1h 19min(79 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.22:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant