NOTE IMDb
6,0/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueEight singles, chosen by clinical physiologist John Aiken, neuropsychotherapist Dr. Trisha Stratford and psychologist Sabina Read, come to find themselves looking for love on a TV show.Eight singles, chosen by clinical physiologist John Aiken, neuropsychotherapist Dr. Trisha Stratford and psychologist Sabina Read, come to find themselves looking for love on a TV show.Eight singles, chosen by clinical physiologist John Aiken, neuropsychotherapist Dr. Trisha Stratford and psychologist Sabina Read, come to find themselves looking for love on a TV show.
- Récompenses
- 5 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I started watching the series due to my liking for the British version and found that this is completely different. For the first few episodes I loved the show and looked forward to watching it of an evening but when I was 15 episodes into a 25 episode series (90 mins per show) I was sick of the amount of recaps of things I'd seen 1000 times before, and trailers for moments that turned out to be anti-climactic at best. I was so sick of the dinner parties and commitment ceremonies and there wasn't enough air time for the likeable and genuine couples.
To be honest, I could be one of the experts if I state the obvious after something happens between a couple.
Dumb, meloframatic, fake, hollow and unfunny. This show will bore you to tears and invade your nightmares with it's thoughtless production desgn and unlikeable personalities. Begging it to be pulled off the air and be replaced by something that's actually funny and creative
The very premise of the show is a relationship lottery from which the majority beneficiaries of are the expert panel, the media company and on a rare occasion the individuals.
It portrays the image of science equalling love but yet we have seen some awful matches and very little love.
On the up side there are the fortunate ones but ... Is the science consistently correct.... No is offcourse the answer because science cannot account for physical attraction and connection.
I question the integrity of the panel as there portrayal does not always relate to them being professional relationship experts based on their comments/responses.
I watched season 6 and for them to decide to make a complete mockery of the show and ignore their own science, being the very premise of the show in which they allowed inviduals from differing couples to get together is a mere statement of actually how important their show is as opposed to the science and/or couples.
In my opinion the fact is that the majority of couples fail and they are simply playing with people's lives and feelings, all for fame, money and publicity ratings and viewer numbers.
Yes it is their choice to participate but I feel the show let's them down immensely.
The format needs a complete overhaul, if indeed not completely terminated.
It portrays the image of science equalling love but yet we have seen some awful matches and very little love.
On the up side there are the fortunate ones but ... Is the science consistently correct.... No is offcourse the answer because science cannot account for physical attraction and connection.
I question the integrity of the panel as there portrayal does not always relate to them being professional relationship experts based on their comments/responses.
I watched season 6 and for them to decide to make a complete mockery of the show and ignore their own science, being the very premise of the show in which they allowed inviduals from differing couples to get together is a mere statement of actually how important their show is as opposed to the science and/or couples.
In my opinion the fact is that the majority of couples fail and they are simply playing with people's lives and feelings, all for fame, money and publicity ratings and viewer numbers.
Yes it is their choice to participate but I feel the show let's them down immensely.
The format needs a complete overhaul, if indeed not completely terminated.
I know this has some dismal reviews, and I get that, but of all the formats of this show, The Australian format is the most watchable. I was made to watch this, and I binge watched several.
Yes it's hideous, yes it's bawdy and outrageous, but I couldn't stop watching. I know this is a show I would normally avoid like the plague, but I had to keep watching.
Of course it lingers on the outrageous, and highlights the worst moments, but underneath that you see some good people.
The settings are glorious, as a Brit, I'm jealous to see all of that sunshine.
It's watchable, 7/10.
Yes it's hideous, yes it's bawdy and outrageous, but I couldn't stop watching. I know this is a show I would normally avoid like the plague, but I had to keep watching.
Of course it lingers on the outrageous, and highlights the worst moments, but underneath that you see some good people.
The settings are glorious, as a Brit, I'm jealous to see all of that sunshine.
It's watchable, 7/10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn A 2020 Interview Sam Ball Said the experiment was fake and the affair was a set up by the producers
- ConnexionsFeatured in A Current Affair: Mick's Makeover! (2019)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Married at First Sight Australia have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Married at First Sight: Australia
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant