NOTE IMDb
5,4/10
6,9 k
MA NOTE
Un perroquet audacieux raconte comment Robinson Crusoé a échoué sur une île tropicale.Un perroquet audacieux raconte comment Robinson Crusoé a échoué sur une île tropicale.Un perroquet audacieux raconte comment Robinson Crusoé a échoué sur une île tropicale.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
Ilka Bessin
- Tapir Rosie
- (voix)
- (as Cindy aus Marzahn)
Ghadah Al-Akel
- Ping
- (voix)
Tommy Morgenstern
- Pong
- (voix)
Melanie Hinze
- Kiki
- (voix)
Bert Franzke
- Edgar
- (voix)
Tobias Lelle
- Pango
- (voix)
Gerald Schaale
- Carmello
- (voix)
Jesco Wirthgen
- Rufus
- (voix)
Jan Makino
- Cecil
- (voix)
Axel Lutter
- John Silver
- (voix)
Tilo Schmitz
- 2. Pirat
- (voix)
Francois Smesny
- 3. Pirat
- (voix)
Avis à la une
It may not be fair to compare an independent Belgian animation to industry dominators like Pixar, but the film industry is competitive.
This film has excellent animation considering it was made by an independent company. Many vibrant colours are featured, and although the don't burst of the screen like Rio, it does add to the aesthetics of the film. Yet, it does feel like the film is very self contained, but it doesn't impact it in a good way. The setting explored (or not) has a lack of scope and the film clearly suffers from this. But for kids, this will not be a problem.
Despite strong design and animation, the direction is nothing notable. There are a maximum of two slightly interesting ideas (in the form of transitions) but other than that, everything else seems average, with no courageous attempts add to adding anything to the story.
Unfortunately, the film falls flat on the storytelling (particularly through dialogue) which just results in everything being cliché and predictable; it brings nothing new to the table. It appears that the writers just gave up, a shame considering if the dialogue wasn't so forced then the film wouldn't suffer so much. There isn't even an innuendo to keep the adults entertained.
This film is a good way to keep the kids occupied for 90mins, but nothing that adults will obtain any pleasure from (unless you are in awe of the animation which I doubt you will be).
This film has excellent animation considering it was made by an independent company. Many vibrant colours are featured, and although the don't burst of the screen like Rio, it does add to the aesthetics of the film. Yet, it does feel like the film is very self contained, but it doesn't impact it in a good way. The setting explored (or not) has a lack of scope and the film clearly suffers from this. But for kids, this will not be a problem.
Despite strong design and animation, the direction is nothing notable. There are a maximum of two slightly interesting ideas (in the form of transitions) but other than that, everything else seems average, with no courageous attempts add to adding anything to the story.
Unfortunately, the film falls flat on the storytelling (particularly through dialogue) which just results in everything being cliché and predictable; it brings nothing new to the table. It appears that the writers just gave up, a shame considering if the dialogue wasn't so forced then the film wouldn't suffer so much. There isn't even an innuendo to keep the adults entertained.
This film is a good way to keep the kids occupied for 90mins, but nothing that adults will obtain any pleasure from (unless you are in awe of the animation which I doubt you will be).
It was very cute but that was not enough to make it all that good.
The animation was pretty good, and I love the fact that the animation seem to be the focus of the film. So much in fact that no big name stars voiced any of the characters in the movie (Being a very small section of the end credits).
Although this did effect the story greatly. The movie is a retelling of Robinson Crusoe, from the point of view of the animals that help him survive on the uncharted desert isle for so long with most of the focus being on a parrot named mac, but Crusoe calls him Tuesday.
The story is not as good as the animation that is telling it, which is going to cost it from being a classic, but it still a OK animated film to see.
The animation was pretty good, and I love the fact that the animation seem to be the focus of the film. So much in fact that no big name stars voiced any of the characters in the movie (Being a very small section of the end credits).
Although this did effect the story greatly. The movie is a retelling of Robinson Crusoe, from the point of view of the animals that help him survive on the uncharted desert isle for so long with most of the focus being on a parrot named mac, but Crusoe calls him Tuesday.
The story is not as good as the animation that is telling it, which is going to cost it from being a classic, but it still a OK animated film to see.
Robinson Crusoe, or the wild life is an animated retelling of how Robinson Crusoe become stranded on a desert island. A story of which is told from the pov of a parrot and a band of animals that you would not think would be n a island, like a goat wearing glasses. The animation was pretty decent and in some ways was better than more mainstream films. I thought the voice cast could have been slightly better, though strong they needed to sound more like what a talking animal would sound like. I'll give it big plus points for not including a bloody rap song and I thought overall it was a decent family animation.
I'm a mildly annoying middle aged woman who doesn't know anything about wildlife stuff but they sometimes have internet stuff about fun facts so this was a good choice by me and yes I'd love to recommend it. I'm told the fx are good but I still think they look fake. The story was a but absurd as if anything can survive out there on treasure island.
This movie is one of the best 3D movies ever made, there're simply tons of pop out effects. Actually this is 3D done right - you're constantly experiencing both pop out and depth effects. So the story is what it is, neither bad nor fantastic - but if you're seeing this movie in 2D, then I'd probably not bother, this is a 3D movie, the movie is completely designed to the 3d format, and this movie needs 3D to come to life. After so many years with mediocre 3D movies it's great to see a movie truly using 3D - and then they cancel all 3D TVs, argh... :-)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe movie was originally released as a short film screening at Kings Dominion Parks
- GaffesNear the beginning of the film the watchman (who kicks the cat) spots an island off the starboard (right) side of the ship, when the Captain is awoken he is sleeping in his room at the back of the ship, he picks up his telescope and looks out of the open window on the port (left) side of the ship and sees the same island.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Top 10 Worst Animated Films of the 2010 Decade (2019)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Wild Life?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Wild Life
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 13 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 8 005 586 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 342 696 $US
- 11 sept. 2016
- Montant brut mondial
- 40 075 446 $US
- Durée1 heure 31 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant