En se retirant dans son chalet du Dorset, Lawrence espère oublier ses combats passés en Arabie, mais il est bientôt entraîné dans des intrigues politiques et ses nombreux ennemis commencent ... Tout lireEn se retirant dans son chalet du Dorset, Lawrence espère oublier ses combats passés en Arabie, mais il est bientôt entraîné dans des intrigues politiques et ses nombreux ennemis commencent à comploter contre lui.En se retirant dans son chalet du Dorset, Lawrence espère oublier ses combats passés en Arabie, mais il est bientôt entraîné dans des intrigues politiques et ses nombreux ennemis commencent à comploter contre lui.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 28 victoires et 7 nominations au total
Avis à la une
I know much of this story from Rodney Legg's 1988 book, so was interested to see it turned into a narrative. And I knew it would be low budget - but low budgets can often be a spur to imaginative and exciting solutions. Not in this case, sadly. Almost every department of moviemaking was shoddy. Direction was leaden. Editing was stodgy. Sound recording was mushy, and sound mixing woeful. Grading? Forget it. Continuity. Ditto. And, as for the acting... From the opening sequence, with a child actor who would have made a primary school nativity audience wince, to our hero, who was presumably trying to convey a tortured soul but only succeeded in looking mildly dyspeptic, even while squeezing out a tear. To be honest, I didn't get far enough into the movie to reach the actors we've heard of. After the second sequence of 'Arabs' running single file right to left I decided to either stay and laugh or go and do something more life-enhancing. I went. If you're interested in the story, track down the book. If you want to see a good movie, go elsewhere.
The worst film I can remember seeing. Memorable only for the screenwriter, actors, sound recording, cinematographer, editor and director duelling it out for who could deliver the worst performance.
That said I would recommend it if only for comedy value. Films as terribly made as this don't come along often. Enjoy.
That said I would recommend it if only for comedy value. Films as terribly made as this don't come along often. Enjoy.
First things first, This was made on a non-existent budget for a feature, a first time director and a tiny crew. So I'll try not to be too harsh, but the director needs to know where he went wrong, so he can improve on it next time.
So there isn't a single aspect of this film that didn't have issues, some more glaring than others. By far the biggest issue is that technically is this the worst film I've ever seen. From Inaudible sound due to the lack of sound mixing and background noise, green screen issues such as jpegs being used as background and no effort to make these believable, visible artefacts from poor keying, horrendous editing (was there anyone keeping an eye on continuity??) along with all that, the camera work really felt like a lazy student film, shots being over and under exposed, lack of thought put into the shots, no colour grading and the footage just looked so dull, and finally I've never seen a film reuse so much footage before, you could turn it into a drinking game (which probably isn't a bad idea if you're going to watch this)
The acting wasn't the worst, but I can't see anyone getting any Oscars any time soon, and oh my god the pacing was mind-numbing this felt like a 4 hour movie. I hope the director reads and takes in all the feedback he will inevitably get and uses that as a jumping off point to improve his skills as a director.
So there isn't a single aspect of this film that didn't have issues, some more glaring than others. By far the biggest issue is that technically is this the worst film I've ever seen. From Inaudible sound due to the lack of sound mixing and background noise, green screen issues such as jpegs being used as background and no effort to make these believable, visible artefacts from poor keying, horrendous editing (was there anyone keeping an eye on continuity??) along with all that, the camera work really felt like a lazy student film, shots being over and under exposed, lack of thought put into the shots, no colour grading and the footage just looked so dull, and finally I've never seen a film reuse so much footage before, you could turn it into a drinking game (which probably isn't a bad idea if you're going to watch this)
The acting wasn't the worst, but I can't see anyone getting any Oscars any time soon, and oh my god the pacing was mind-numbing this felt like a 4 hour movie. I hope the director reads and takes in all the feedback he will inevitably get and uses that as a jumping off point to improve his skills as a director.
I had high expectations for this film but unfortunately I found it disappointing. The story itself was interesting and held my attention, but the sound, continuity and photography were all inadequate, not to mention the tedious, incessant and inappropriate music score. The acting, with a few exceptions, was weak, and to bill Brian Cox as the star in the opening credits showed some nerve - what a con! He never even appeared on screen, just providing brief narration. I sat through the whole film wondering how on earth it could have won any kinds of awards or indeed how it was even selected for various film festivals. Clearly this film was made on too small a budget, making it look like an over-stretched amateur production.
I think my heading sums it up best...
When they started with the opening scene I though it had to be part of the local adverts..... right?
Wrong.... Yes i went in knowing it was low budget & shot locally but even so I expected much better than this.
Everything about it was poor, opening music sounded like it was done on one of those toy xylophone's, sound quality abysmal, acting that would have seen those in a local production having non-speaking parts the following year, the direction... where to start.... I think you get the picture...
It really is one to avoid, i walked out after 30 minutes otherwise I would have been rolling in the aisles & watching it locally I suspect there were a few in the audience who were "extras" so I saved myself the shaming....
Looking through the reviews I suspect those giving high marks actually appeared in the film as I really didnt see anything worthy of more than a one.
It really was horrible & moreso as I admire & am fascinated by the TE Lawrence story.
When they started with the opening scene I though it had to be part of the local adverts..... right?
Wrong.... Yes i went in knowing it was low budget & shot locally but even so I expected much better than this.
Everything about it was poor, opening music sounded like it was done on one of those toy xylophone's, sound quality abysmal, acting that would have seen those in a local production having non-speaking parts the following year, the direction... where to start.... I think you get the picture...
It really is one to avoid, i walked out after 30 minutes otherwise I would have been rolling in the aisles & watching it locally I suspect there were a few in the audience who were "extras" so I saved myself the shaming....
Looking through the reviews I suspect those giving high marks actually appeared in the film as I really didnt see anything worthy of more than a one.
It really was horrible & moreso as I admire & am fascinated by the TE Lawrence story.
Le saviez-vous
- Anecdotes'Lawrence: After Arabia' is the final act in a T.E. Lawrence' trilogy of sorts. First was David Lean's immortal Lawrence d'Arabie (1962), followed by A Dangerous Man: Lawrence After Arabia (1992) (Lawrence at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919-1920). 'Lawrence: After Arabia' is focused on his final years.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Who Killed Lawrence of Arabia? (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lawrence: After Arabia?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 120 971 £GB (estimé)
- Durée2 heures 1 minute
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the English language plot outline for Lawrence: After Arabia (2021)?
Répondre