Un officier d'élite du renseignement américain aidé par une unité de commandement tactique top secrète tente de faire sortir du pays un policier mystérieux détenant des informations comprome... Tout lireUn officier d'élite du renseignement américain aidé par une unité de commandement tactique top secrète tente de faire sortir du pays un policier mystérieux détenant des informations compromettantes.Un officier d'élite du renseignement américain aidé par une unité de commandement tactique top secrète tente de faire sortir du pays un policier mystérieux détenant des informations compromettantes.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
Carlo Alban
- William Douglas III
- (as Carlo Albán)
Lee Chae-rin
- Queen
- (as Chae Rin Lee)
Avis à la une
I understand the criticisms about this movie. But the criticisms fail to consider the movie as a whole and only consider minor things. It is very difficult with respect to me to like a movie, yet I liked this one! I will mention the pros and cons and let the reader decides. I will start with the cons to explain why this movie doesn't get a high rating despite it deserves a lot more.
Cons (as mentioned by criticisms):
1) Camera shaking. It is not perfect but not too bad. It doesn't prevent you from enjoying the movie.
2) Fast dialog. This is an action movie - not a drama. More dialog will make it boring.
3) Story. This a personal opinion. I personally like the story.
Now, why I would give such a movie 8 stars although I am very difficult to be satisfied by any movie.
Pros:
1) In most cases, in action movies, the good guy (hero) starts weak and suddenly becomes unbeatable at the end. Or sometimes the hero is already unbeatable from the beginning to the end. In this movie, we have a fair war. The good guys (heroes) lose and lose and lose from the beginning to the end. The bad guys are tough and really tough, and many times in the movie you wonder "how are they going to make it!?".
2) This movie is very fast. Everything is fast. You will never get bored. No unnecessary lengthy dialog. It is full from the beginning to the end unlike other movies where the director just pass minutes by unnecessary lengthy dialog and scenes.
3) The twist. Although you may predict the end, but it is really satisfying connecting all the parts of the movie into a single picture.
I write this review because I think this movie got a lot less than what it deserves.
This is an action movie that is fast, straight without any derailing. Good and bad guys are almost equal - Fair war- this creates a lot of thrill. Actions scenes are good and thrilling. The story is also good with a very satisfying end.
Don't listen to criticisms. I strongly recommend this movie. You will not be disappointed.
Cons (as mentioned by criticisms):
1) Camera shaking. It is not perfect but not too bad. It doesn't prevent you from enjoying the movie.
2) Fast dialog. This is an action movie - not a drama. More dialog will make it boring.
3) Story. This a personal opinion. I personally like the story.
Now, why I would give such a movie 8 stars although I am very difficult to be satisfied by any movie.
Pros:
1) In most cases, in action movies, the good guy (hero) starts weak and suddenly becomes unbeatable at the end. Or sometimes the hero is already unbeatable from the beginning to the end. In this movie, we have a fair war. The good guys (heroes) lose and lose and lose from the beginning to the end. The bad guys are tough and really tough, and many times in the movie you wonder "how are they going to make it!?".
2) This movie is very fast. Everything is fast. You will never get bored. No unnecessary lengthy dialog. It is full from the beginning to the end unlike other movies where the director just pass minutes by unnecessary lengthy dialog and scenes.
3) The twist. Although you may predict the end, but it is really satisfying connecting all the parts of the movie into a single picture.
I write this review because I think this movie got a lot less than what it deserves.
This is an action movie that is fast, straight without any derailing. Good and bad guys are almost equal - Fair war- this creates a lot of thrill. Actions scenes are good and thrilling. The story is also good with a very satisfying end.
Don't listen to criticisms. I strongly recommend this movie. You will not be disappointed.
Mile 22 has a simple goal in its script, maybe too simple, get this man from point A to point B. The script itself has a great twist at the end, but for the rest of the movie it's lazy. We get to know everything about Mark Wahlberg's characters through 2 minutes of exposition, which is Michael Bay-type lazy. And for the rest of the movie he doesn't really change, nor do any of the other characters. The action is entertaining, but it is shaky and quickly cut together, and not like Paul Greengrass, more like Columbiana. I thought Hollywood was done with this trope of cutting quickly to hide the action, John Wick and Atomic Blonde showed us that. But this movie does it again. Overall, the movie is just meh, not great, not the worst, just meh. And I expected better from Peter Berg.
I saw this movie last night, and I was hoping to be entertained, but I walked away disappointment.
I think the acting was a bit too much and strange, especially from Wahlberg. He's a bit too brash and I couldn't connect with him.
Cohan's acting was pretty good on the big screen, quite a difference from Walking Dead.
I am pleased to see that Rousey getting to act and have more lines to work on. I think she has a future.
IF they are going to make a sequel out of it...all I have to say is, Calm down, Wahlberg...
I think the acting was a bit too much and strange, especially from Wahlberg. He's a bit too brash and I couldn't connect with him.
Cohan's acting was pretty good on the big screen, quite a difference from Walking Dead.
I am pleased to see that Rousey getting to act and have more lines to work on. I think she has a future.
IF they are going to make a sequel out of it...all I have to say is, Calm down, Wahlberg...
Trailer looked great, but the actual movie is just an awkward disappointment. This was weird, coming from director Peter Berg but I don't completely blame him. The writing is just awkward. Mark Wahlberg plays a super dedicated, grossly over-the-top special ops type guy who is just constantly going on rants to give intensity to the movie but it just comes off as weird, unnecessary, and confusing. Lauren Cohan is the most frustrated divorced mother ever. Finally, they cast Ronda Roussey only to give her ZERO fight scenes and barely any lines....great.
The star of the movie is the Iko Uwais character, with amazing fight scenes with perhaps too many fast changing angles so you cannot exactly follow what's happening. Action scenes were almost decent but the overall plot was so foolish it turned me off.
The star of the movie is the Iko Uwais character, with amazing fight scenes with perhaps too many fast changing angles so you cannot exactly follow what's happening. Action scenes were almost decent but the overall plot was so foolish it turned me off.
I've been looking forward to this movie for a while now and I have to say I was a little let down. The action is really good but the plot and script were not so good, especially Wahlberg's character. He wouldn't stop talking in these OCD ramblings as they tried to make him look like a gifted mind that is on overdrive 24/7. He came off like an old Dennis Leary except not funny and more rambling.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMark Wahlberg's character stated, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." The quote is attributable to English author George Orwell.
- GaffesWhen he first meets the head of Indocarr security, James threatens him by suggesting that Indocarr aircraft are violating the airspace of the embassy by flying low over the compound. This may just be macho bravado, but legally speaking it is wrong: airspace over any foreign embassy remains the sovereign territory of the host country.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: Mark Wahlberg/Bernie Sanders (2018)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Mile 22?Alimenté par Alexa
- Are we going to see the sequel of this movie? Love to watch one more...
- What´s the meaning of what Li Noor keeps doing with his fingers?
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Milla 22: el escape
- Lieux de tournage
- Bogota, Colombie(Colombia)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 50 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 36 108 758 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 13 710 825 $US
- 19 août 2018
- Montant brut mondial
- 66 308 758 $US
- Durée1 heure 34 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant