[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Guide des épisodes
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

What on Earth?

  • Série télévisée
  • 2015–
  • TV-PG
  • 44min
NOTE IMDb
5,8/10
711
MA NOTE
What on Earth? (2015)
Documentary

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueScientist explore some of Earth's phenomenons.Scientist explore some of Earth's phenomenons.Scientist explore some of Earth's phenomenons.

  • Casting principal
    • Steven Kearney
    • Mike Pavelec
    • Randy Cerveny
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,8/10
    711
    MA NOTE
    • Casting principal
      • Steven Kearney
      • Mike Pavelec
      • Randy Cerveny
    • 57avis d'utilisateurs
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Épisodes130

    Parcourir les épisodes
    HautLes mieux notés

    Photos60

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 54
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux99+

    Modifier
    Steven Kearney
    • Self - Narrator…
    • 2015–2022
    Mike Pavelec
    • Self - Military Historian…
    • 2015–2020
    Randy Cerveny
    • Self - Climatologist…
    • 2015–2020
    Klint Janulis
    Klint Janulis
    • Self - Archaeologist…
    • 2019–2022
    Alan Lester
    • Self - Geologist…
    • 2015–2020
    Andrew Gough
    Andrew Gough
    • Self - Journalist…
    • 2015–2019
    George Kourounis
    • Self - Explorer
    • 2017–2020
    Lindsay Moran
    • Self - Former CIA Operative…
    • 2017–2020
    Martin K.A. Morgan
    Martin K.A. Morgan
    • Self - Historian
    • 2017–2020
    Mark Altaweel
    • Self - Archaeologist…
    • 2015–2019
    Mark Horton
    • Self - Archaeologist
    • 2017–2020
    Marc D'Antonio
    Marc D'Antonio
    • Self - Image Analyst…
    • 2016–2019
    Haley Chamberlain
    • Self - Science Journalist…
    • 2017–2020
    Brittany Brand
    • Self - Volcanologist…
    • 2015–2019
    Karen Bellinger
    Karen Bellinger
    • Self…
    • 2017–2020
    David Krueger
    • Self - Historian…
    • 2017–2019
    Kirsten Sanford
    • Self - Science Communicator…
    • 2017–2019
    Mike Capps
    • Self - Technology Theorist…
    • 2015–2017
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs57

    5,8711
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    1maxima-36494

    Pseudo-science for Bored Conspiracy Buffs

    The series started out OK but has since degenerated into Enquirer-level sensationalism. The show has likely run out of ideas and is now willing to present known and already-explained phenomena as unsolved mysteries.

    An example: satellite photos and video show an enormous 3,000-mile wide shadow moving across the planet! What on earth could it be?!?

    1. Is it secret gov't technology deployed into space to cool a too-warm earth? Evidently, according to our scientists, we don't have the capability to do it or keep it secret.

    2. All right, how about a huge insect swarm? The largest swarm ever documented covered about 75 square miles. But this shadow is way bigger and moving at 2,000 miles per hour! Can insects fly that fast? Who knows. Let's check with our scientists!

    3. OK, insects are out. So what if the shadow was caused a huge alien ship like the one in Independence Day? And the gov't is covering it up? Let's ask our scientists if its possible to hide an alien spacecraft the size of Australia.

    4. Ok, alien ships are out, at least for now 'cuz we ain't entirely convinced. But what else could have caused this shadow?

    We're outta ideas so how can we figure this out? Should we consult NASA since they provided the satellite data? They can't be much smarter than our own scientists, but fine, we'll ask 'em during the commercial break ... and, we're back and, OMG, NASA claims the shadow was caused by ... THE MOON? Are they sure? Could this be another cover-up? And NASA "claims" lunar eclipses are 100% predictable? Well, maybe we'll figure all this out someday but for now ... ITS A MYSTERY!

    Coming up next: Crop circles!
    1jjgsports

    Same content packed into "new" episodes. Fake scientists. Pathetic.

    At first I was super excited to see the show thinking hey maybe they will have cool top secret things that we don't really know. It turns out they just show really stupid things with increasingly stupid reasons for why its there. Not only that but they have fake scientists that take forever to get to the point and if that weren't bad enough, they jam the EXACT SAME content into "new"episodes. It's abysmal that they can even get away with calling them new episodes. Such a shame that they fail miserably at what could be a good show. Just wiki search weird Google map photos and you will get to the point faster and get better answers than this show will give you.
    busybiggs

    What on earth

    This show has great locations but please the way you zero in on the location treats average people like they are dumb. The episode that had Centrailia Pennsylvania in it you used Fort Detrick as a suspect and one on a video of a sea monster in norway i think you cited aan old nazi sub's torpedo this is crazy. People who watch the show are pretty knowledgable to begin with. Please look at this thank you
    3carlosv72

    Terrible disservice to science

    Everyone above this comment hit the nail on the head. This is a waste of time to anyone truly interested in science. The ridiculous argument before explaining what is obvious to a lot of learned people is really insulting. I was watching another show called NASA's Unexplained Files and the premise was as ridiculous as the one for What on earth, checked out the production company... guess what?? same guy... When I'm looking on the program guide and see these two programs I feel sad because the channels that are normally watch for science stories and interesting stuff are busy showing this garbage. I guess it's a cheap show and that's why they use it, I don't know. Here's is to missing The Learning Channel 20 years ago when it started (The Operation anyone? that was so cool!!). I guess everything gets lowered to the minimum common denominator or whatever sells to the masses... really sad.
    1mjudyski

    The Laziest Science Series Ever...

    Allow me to give you a couple excerpts from a few different episode descriptions: •S4Ep5 - "A Possible sighting of Genghis Khan's tomb" •S3Ep6(Titled "Hidden Tomb of Genghis Khan") •S4Ep3 - "Strange spiral markings in an African desert" •S3Ep3 - "Strange spiral markings in the remote African desert." •S2Ep2 - "Weird barren rings in the Namib Dessert." (If you didn't guess it, The Namib Dessert is a remote African dessert...)

    Do you see the pattern? they are just recycling entire episodes or segments from the previous season and calling it new.

    Naturally one may think that xfinity has just messed up the descriptions, but nope. I watch them every week, Wednesday morning on my DVR, and it is all stuff they have shown already just called season 4 -_- talk about lazy. It's not even like they are giving the topics another look, or introducing new findings or theories to the story. It is word for word, scene for scene, exactly the same!

    I mean the stories are decent, sometimes they really try and play them up to make the incredibly mundane seem interesting until a scientist says it's just some natural phenomenon, but aside from that, and the fact that nothing new has been in any of the episodes in the last few months, I'd still rank it as sub-par compared to some other shows of the same variety, even ones appearing on the science channel.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Mysteries of the Abandoned
    7,4
    Mysteries of the Abandoned
    L'Histoire en 3D
    7,3
    L'Histoire en 3D
    The Proof Is Out There
    6,6
    The Proof Is Out There
    Strange Evidence
    4,6
    Strange Evidence
    Mysteries from Above
    5,7
    Mysteries from Above
    History's Greatest Mysteries
    6,9
    History's Greatest Mysteries
    Mysteries of the Abandoned: Hidden America
    7,3
    Mysteries of the Abandoned: Hidden America
    Mysteries of the Deep
    6,8
    Mysteries of the Deep
    Les clés de l'univers
    8,9
    Les clés de l'univers
    Alien Theory
    7,0
    Alien Theory
    American Detective with Lt. Joe Kenda
    8,2
    American Detective with Lt. Joe Kenda
    The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
    6,5
    The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Bandes originales
      Finding Clues
      Written by Miguel Moreno

      "Ancient Thought"

      Written by Miguel Moreno

      "Adios Bolero"

      Written by Miguel Moreno

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ13

    • How many seasons does What on Earth? have?Alimenté par Alexa
    • Who underwrites this drivel - and why is the Science Channel foisting it on the viewing public?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 2 février 2015 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Science Channel/Discovery site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Curiosidades de la Tierra
    • Société de production
      • Wag TV
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      44 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 16:9 HD

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    What on Earth? (2015)
    Lacune principale
    What is the French language plot outline for What on Earth? (2015)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la pageAjouter un épisode

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.