Cinquante Nuances plus claires
Titre original : Fifty Shades Freed
Anastasia (Dakota Johnson) et Christian (Jamie Dornan) se marient, mais Jack Hyde continue de menacer leur relation.Anastasia (Dakota Johnson) et Christian (Jamie Dornan) se marient, mais Jack Hyde continue de menacer leur relation.Anastasia (Dakota Johnson) et Christian (Jamie Dornan) se marient, mais Jack Hyde continue de menacer leur relation.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 10 nominations au total
Avis à la une
The first of the three that is actually emotionally intense. The film felt short compared to the book, but that's normal. Also, while watching, I found myself making cinematic connections between this and the last 2 Twilight movies, which was funny, especially given E.L. James's start as a fan fiction author. Is it an Oscar-worthy performance? No. Is it entertaining for a week night after a long day at work? Yes.
What a rough viewing. It seems like an atrociously bad episode of a crime show, with a heavy focus on the characters romantic relationship. Avoid this movie.
Here we go again..
I genuinely hoped.. there would've been change.
Sadly, I have to state the obvious: this is among the worst trilogies of film-making I' ve seen.
Acting? Bad. They were both there for a paycheck and nothing else.
Story? Well you see them getting married in the trailer.. and then you see her ex-boss picking up a gun, right? well there you have it.
Cinematogrophy: Worst than the first, but better than the second. Nothing to add there.
Dialogue: ... let's not go there..
All in all, i would give it a 1/10, because it was nice to look at some landscape for time to time. This review is short, because the movie was done short. it was bad from beginning to end, with horrible dialogue, with unstable emotions of both characters.. you get a sense of where this franchise couldve gone and done it right at the very end... but by then it meant nothing. god... I hate the writer who wrote it and I condemn writers like that back to wherever they came from.
I genuinely hoped.. there would've been change.
Sadly, I have to state the obvious: this is among the worst trilogies of film-making I' ve seen.
Acting? Bad. They were both there for a paycheck and nothing else.
Story? Well you see them getting married in the trailer.. and then you see her ex-boss picking up a gun, right? well there you have it.
Cinematogrophy: Worst than the first, but better than the second. Nothing to add there.
Dialogue: ... let's not go there..
All in all, i would give it a 1/10, because it was nice to look at some landscape for time to time. This review is short, because the movie was done short. it was bad from beginning to end, with horrible dialogue, with unstable emotions of both characters.. you get a sense of where this franchise couldve gone and done it right at the very end... but by then it meant nothing. god... I hate the writer who wrote it and I condemn writers like that back to wherever they came from.
The whole triology draws extreme attention, which is really sad for the film industry, and it says really much of the people today. This triology represents probably the biggest commercial junk there is, and the insane amount of people are here to see it, and, of course, are fulfilling the sole purpose of these films - money. I have watched all three films so I could give a review, but just thinking about it gives me an utter nausea, it was extremely hard to persevere through that toxic waste and to see other people enjoying the same.
What gets me the most is that the audience for independent films, art films are extremely small, and for making those films, people give their hearts out, those are the ones that have something to give to the audience and to the film industry itself - pure, raw art.
What gets me the most is that the audience for independent films, art films are extremely small, and for making those films, people give their hearts out, those are the ones that have something to give to the audience and to the film industry itself - pure, raw art.
"Fifty Shades Freed" (R, 1:45) is the third and final installment in the trilogy of erotic S&M-tinged movies based on the novels by E.L. James (after 2015's "Fifty Shades of Grey" and 2017's "Fifty Shades Darker"). This one begins where most romantic films end - with a wedding. Having accepted the sweet marriage proposal of troubled billionaire entrepreneur Christian Gray (Jamie Dornan) at the end of the second film, book editor Anastasia Steele (Dakota Johnson) vows her faithfulness and devotion to her beloved in the first scene of this film and he responds in kind. They're over-the-moon happy. Then reality sets in.
Mr. and Mrs. Gray have to cut their honeymoon in France short when Christian receives a phone call about a data breach and fire in his corporate offices. They quickly discover that the perpetrator is an old enemy, but they're not sure what he's after. As Christian works his back channels to find out (and keeping much of what he finds from his new wife), the two of them struggle through many of the growing pains which most newlyweds deal with - but it all seems to come up in a very condensed period of time. Should she go by "Mrs. Gray" or "Ms. Steele" at work? (And should/does he have any say in the matter?) How much control should they have over each other's lives and activities? (especially since control has always been such a theme and point of contention in their relationship) Do they want kids? (How the hell did they not discuss this before they got married??) Oh, and how much personal security should she have? (Like I said, typical newlywed issues.) And then there's the growing threat from the someone(s) from their past - who is seriously f****ing with them... while they f*** each other... often.
Yes, even with everything else going on, there are still plenty of sex scenes (both the typical kind and the kinky), but the sex (especially the S&M) almost takes a back seat to the plot at this point in Christian and Ana's saga. As in the two previous films, the conflicts feel contrived, but they do add some extra layers of drama to this story - and even some danger and suspense. In my opinion, the first film had the most exciting sex scenes, the second one had the best story and this one has the best mix of elements. None of these movies are going to be confused with high cinematic art, but they still can be pretty enjoyable, if you accept them for what they are - sexy romantic fantasy. After all, that's what E.L. James' series of books is about (as amateurishly written as they are) and isn't escapism one reason we go to the movies? This one is pretty entertaining in its genre, especially for fans of the books, and that's good enough. "B+"
Mr. and Mrs. Gray have to cut their honeymoon in France short when Christian receives a phone call about a data breach and fire in his corporate offices. They quickly discover that the perpetrator is an old enemy, but they're not sure what he's after. As Christian works his back channels to find out (and keeping much of what he finds from his new wife), the two of them struggle through many of the growing pains which most newlyweds deal with - but it all seems to come up in a very condensed period of time. Should she go by "Mrs. Gray" or "Ms. Steele" at work? (And should/does he have any say in the matter?) How much control should they have over each other's lives and activities? (especially since control has always been such a theme and point of contention in their relationship) Do they want kids? (How the hell did they not discuss this before they got married??) Oh, and how much personal security should she have? (Like I said, typical newlywed issues.) And then there's the growing threat from the someone(s) from their past - who is seriously f****ing with them... while they f*** each other... often.
Yes, even with everything else going on, there are still plenty of sex scenes (both the typical kind and the kinky), but the sex (especially the S&M) almost takes a back seat to the plot at this point in Christian and Ana's saga. As in the two previous films, the conflicts feel contrived, but they do add some extra layers of drama to this story - and even some danger and suspense. In my opinion, the first film had the most exciting sex scenes, the second one had the best story and this one has the best mix of elements. None of these movies are going to be confused with high cinematic art, but they still can be pretty enjoyable, if you accept them for what they are - sexy romantic fantasy. After all, that's what E.L. James' series of books is about (as amateurishly written as they are) and isn't escapism one reason we go to the movies? This one is pretty entertaining in its genre, especially for fans of the books, and that's good enough. "B+"
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe cover for the DVD box of "Fifty Shades Freed" is the exact opposite of Cinquante nuances de Grey (2015). For the first movie's box cover, Anastasia is the one with her arms up, while Christian is the one about to kiss her, but for this movie's box cover, Christian is the one with his arms up, while Anastasia is about to kiss him.
- GaffesAna is able to withdraw $5 million in cash from her bank in a matter of minutes, but no bank routinely keeps that much cash on hand.
- Citations
Christian Grey: You insist on defying me, Mrs. Grey. What should I do about that?
Anastasia Steele: [smiling] Learn to live with it.
- Crédits fousThere's a mid-credits scene: A couple of years later, Anastasia and Christian are playing with their son. She's pregnant again.
- Versions alternativesThe running time quoted by IMDB, "1h 45m," is for the theatrical version. There is also a longer, unrated version, released chiefly for home distribution, running at 1 hr 50 min, five minutes longer. The unrated version includes, among other scenes, two with Kim Basinger, who plays Elena Lincoln, an ex-girlfriend of Christian, and supposed origin of his peculiar tastes. Kim Basinger earlier starred in the movie "9½ Weeks" (1986), a movie about a woman who begins an affair with a man that is characterized by unusual sex games, like the sex in the Fifty Shades trilogy. The book that that movie is based on, by author Elizabeth McNeil (a pseudonym for Ingeborg Day) is, like the "Fifty Shades" books, much more explicit about the S&M aspects of the relationship, although it concludes with an "unhappy" ending, wherein the relationship ends badly. Another difference is that Elizabeth McNeil's original novel is supposedly based on a true story, whereas the author of the Fifty Shades trilogy has never made that claim.
- ConnexionsEdited into Funny or Die Presents...: Fifty Shades of DeVito (2018)
- Bandes originalesCapital Letters
Written by Ellie Goulding, BloodPop (as BloodPop®), Raye (as Rachel Keen), Ely Weisfeld, Andy Jackson (as Andrew Jackson), Hailee Steinfeld
Performed by Hailee Steinfeld x BloodPop (as BloodPop®)
Produced by BloodPop (as BloodPop®)
Orchestral Arrangements by Pete Anthony & David Buckley
Hailee Steinfeld appears courtesy of Republic Records
BloodPop® appears courtesy of GENPOP, Corp. under management by Mastor Craft/Blood Company
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Fifty Shades Freed?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 55 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 100 407 760 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 38 560 195 $US
- 11 févr. 2018
- Montant brut mondial
- 371 985 018 $US
- Durée1 heure 45 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant