2307: Winter's Dream
- 2016
- 1h 41min
NOTE IMDb
3,7/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn 2307, a soldier is sent on a mission to hunt down the leader of the humanoid rebellion.In 2307, a soldier is sent on a mission to hunt down the leader of the humanoid rebellion.In 2307, a soldier is sent on a mission to hunt down the leader of the humanoid rebellion.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 8 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Sirwan Assad
- Corporal Wilson
- (as Sirwan Assad al Naibesi)
Kenneth K Martinez Burgmaier
- Rich John- Extra
- (as Kenneth Burgmaier)
Avis à la une
From the very beginning, you can already see how the acting is, simply, horrible. The chemistry they tried to create between the squad members is so so so painful to watch that I had to turn off the tv. Could not get past 20 minutes.
It seemed like a good plot/concept but the execution makes it unwatchable.
It seemed like a good plot/concept but the execution makes it unwatchable.
Throughout the movie you see actors with shaky hands fumbling with things that are supposed to be natural. The movie itself is ok but nothing that interesting or special. The fumbling starts about 1 minute into the movie when an actor almost knocks a tray out of a waiters hand...
It's pretty hard to watch because it tries to be too edgy as well. There is way too much emphasis on the use of vape pens and it looks extremely unnatural. The people using them arent even inhaling just making as much vapor as possible as quickly as possible lol. Add in the rat faced girl soldier who is chewing tobacco and constantly spitting clear saliva in a cup...it tries WAY TOO HARD and looks like a joke.
Now the special effects...If you have a limited budget I understand that this part would be lacking but some of the stuff they do just makes it look like a joke. An exampled? Dump truck randomly has it's engine explode and then when they lift the hood it looks like someone is using a sparkler inside of an exhaust pipe.
It's pretty bad.
It's pretty hard to watch because it tries to be too edgy as well. There is way too much emphasis on the use of vape pens and it looks extremely unnatural. The people using them arent even inhaling just making as much vapor as possible as quickly as possible lol. Add in the rat faced girl soldier who is chewing tobacco and constantly spitting clear saliva in a cup...it tries WAY TOO HARD and looks like a joke.
Now the special effects...If you have a limited budget I understand that this part would be lacking but some of the stuff they do just makes it look like a joke. An exampled? Dump truck randomly has it's engine explode and then when they lift the hood it looks like someone is using a sparkler inside of an exhaust pipe.
It's pretty bad.
Formulaic pseudo-post apocalyptic film, with terrible action scenes and the flimsiest excuse of a plot, carelessly patched together by common myths infesting actual movies.
There's really little to none redeeming value in this.
1)As sci-fi it doesn't even compete; it raises no questions, introduces no new ideas, creates not even a shadow of an actual futuristic setting.
2)As a thriller it has no tension; nobody can summon the willpower to care for "characters" who systematically act out the most inane choices and the amateurish direction doesn't help.
3)The backbone of the plot is so.. safe, it feels like a sham. I'll occasionally stomach the pseudo-intellectual doctrine that passes for liberalism in Hollywood these days as long as it is attached to a 100M production. But in an independent production - and a sci-fi to boot - I expect to be presented with the unpopular opinion, the 'truth' that lacks recognition or exposure, not to be spoon-fed the mainstream dogma!
In any case there were a couple of decent lines - maybe even competent - so I'll give it a 2.
There's really little to none redeeming value in this.
1)As sci-fi it doesn't even compete; it raises no questions, introduces no new ideas, creates not even a shadow of an actual futuristic setting.
2)As a thriller it has no tension; nobody can summon the willpower to care for "characters" who systematically act out the most inane choices and the amateurish direction doesn't help.
3)The backbone of the plot is so.. safe, it feels like a sham. I'll occasionally stomach the pseudo-intellectual doctrine that passes for liberalism in Hollywood these days as long as it is attached to a 100M production. But in an independent production - and a sci-fi to boot - I expect to be presented with the unpopular opinion, the 'truth' that lacks recognition or exposure, not to be spoon-fed the mainstream dogma!
In any case there were a couple of decent lines - maybe even competent - so I'll give it a 2.
Enjoyed several elements in this film, not the least of which was the performance of its lead actor Paul Sidhu. His character was quite cliché, but he dressed it up with a solid, believable performance. The rest of the cast was equally cliché, pretty much every character trope you've ever seen in a sci-fi action film. Unfortunately, most of the other actors, with an exception or two, did not pull off their performances as well as the lead. The action, and pacing we're good and the overall production quality was pretty decent. The plot is basically Blade Runner in a winter apocalypse with elements of Aliens and, well, five or six other sci-fi movies. It's a bit of a mess, story wise, there were flashbacks to the main character's backstory that were uninteresting and distracted from the action, but it held together enough to keep me wanting to see what happened next.
Starts so-so ... continues even less so-so ... picks up where it's a little too late ... ends nicely enough although weak amateurish acting (despite all the effort everybody puts into making it look professional) is probably the main problem with this not so well made movie just as it is with most other low budget ones ...
the winter setting is kinda cool but not cold enough ... ;-) some shots and scenes are also fine enough to make me like them, especially in terms of lighting ...
overall, it reminded me of some really cheap and failed movies i used to watch in the Syfy channel in the mid 2000s (when it was still named Sci-Fi or something like that) and that was why i stopped watching that channel almost totally and started seeking better scifi stuff elsewhere on regular channels ...
the winter setting is kinda cool but not cold enough ... ;-) some shots and scenes are also fine enough to make me like them, especially in terms of lighting ...
overall, it reminded me of some really cheap and failed movies i used to watch in the Syfy channel in the mid 2000s (when it was still named Sci-Fi or something like that) and that was why i stopped watching that channel almost totally and started seeking better scifi stuff elsewhere on regular channels ...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesA data pad used at multiple times including the briefing scene at the beginning, has symbols on it that are the same alphabet used in the Star Wars universe.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 2307: Winter's Dream?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Winter's Dream
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 200 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 5 078 $US
- Durée1 heure 41 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was 2307: Winter's Dream (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre