NOTE IMDb
3,6/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Un étranger mystérieux se rend dans un village isolé où sa femme et sa fille ont été kidnappées quinze ans plus tôt.Un étranger mystérieux se rend dans un village isolé où sa femme et sa fille ont été kidnappées quinze ans plus tôt.Un étranger mystérieux se rend dans un village isolé où sa femme et sa fille ont été kidnappées quinze ans plus tôt.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Mysterious is not, exciting is not, unpredictable is not, action is not, violence is not, romantic is not. This movie is typically nothing good at any aspects.
I'm a Dolph Lundgren fan but this was terrible!
One of the worst editing jobs I've seen. It's like a bunch of randomly filmed scenes all put together, no flow of any kind of story. Very slow and the action sucked. They used stand ins for Dolph on almost any scene that was shot from the back, acting was bad and nothing made sense. Just avoid at all costs and hopefully next time we get a decent action flick from Lundgren.
This is a very useless movie that they should never have wasted time and money on making. It has parts of a story, but not all, maybe there is 30% of the story here. And seriously no background on anyone. Suddenly there is some drugs and then there is a kidnapping... Looks like Dolph Lundgren took a vacation to italy and managed to include a little acting...
Dolph Lundgreen has the looks. He has the skills. And he has had a lot of opportunities to go big, playing parts in big productions.
Then why does he do these amateur movies? He's obviously the only trained actor - the rest are extras with no acting skills. The filmography is just as ridiculous as the score, and it's evident that no real writer was attached.
This is not even at par with film school projects, and Dolph is not getting younger.
I would love to see him play the lead in an adaption of just about any Robert Ludlum film adaptation.
Then why does he do these amateur movies? He's obviously the only trained actor - the rest are extras with no acting skills. The filmography is just as ridiculous as the score, and it's evident that no real writer was attached.
This is not even at par with film school projects, and Dolph is not getting younger.
I would love to see him play the lead in an adaption of just about any Robert Ludlum film adaptation.
Similar idea to Taken of Liam Neeson. Basically revenge, child, corruption, taking things into own hands, saving somebody. Meaning good idea or topic, and story. But bad colors, resolution, recording, acting, details, quality, and almost everything. There is too much dark colors, to little things to see because most is recorded from the close up, not showing us greater picture of the environment. Also not good intro, explanation, and outro. Also did not like that there was too much foreign language which makes it difficult or impossible to understand. Bit adventurous and emotional. But still too old. Overally I am not satisfied. I expected better explanation, intro, and more daylight and colors.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMarco Mazzoli (who plays Antonio Graziani) is the host of Italy's #1 radio show (Lo Zoo di 105).
- GaffesThe young Hakensson is left eye dominant when shooting, Dolph is right eye dominant.
- Versions alternativesThe version premiered in Japan (95 minutes) runs 8 minutes longer than the US-released cut (87 min).
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Tracker?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El rastreador
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 35 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Tracker (2019) officially released in India in English?
Répondre