Les Animaux fantastiques : Les Crimes de Grindelwald
Titre original : Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
- 2018
- Tous publics
- 2h 14min
Le deuxième opus de la série "Les animaux fantastiques" se déroule dans le monde magique de J.K. Rowling et présente les aventures du magizoologiste Norbert Dragonneau.Le deuxième opus de la série "Les animaux fantastiques" se déroule dans le monde magique de J.K. Rowling et présente les aventures du magizoologiste Norbert Dragonneau.Le deuxième opus de la série "Les animaux fantastiques" se déroule dans le monde magique de J.K. Rowling et présente les aventures du magizoologiste Norbert Dragonneau.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Nomination aux 2 BAFTA Awards
- 3 victoires et 22 nominations au total
Cornell John
- Arnold Guzman
- (as Cornell S. John)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' offers a darker tone and expanded world-building with mixed reception. Praised for performances by Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp, and Jude Law, and impressive visual effects, the film struggles with a convoluted plot and numerous subplots. Critics argue it lacks focus, serving more as a setup for future installments. Disappointment arises from the limited role of fantastic beasts and an underdeveloped villain. Despite these issues, some appreciate its deeper exploration of the wizarding world and ties to the Harry Potter series.
Avis à la une
Let me start off by saying that I am a big Harry Potter fan; I loved all 8 HP movies, and really liked the 1st installment of Newt's adventures as well.
This movie just didn't really do the trick for me. There was absolutely nothing to complain about visually; the movie was even more stunning than the first one, with even more beautifully designed 'Beasts'. And as many other people have mentioned, as a Harry Potter fan, you just can't hate this movie. Where Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them only contained a handful amount of references to the Harry Potter series, The Crimes of Grindelwald has tonnes. Enough to hype up any Harry Potter fan.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
The movie was entertaining and visually stunning. It was nice to see Newt and co. again, however the two standout performances were from Johnny Depp and Jude Law as Grindelwald and Dumbledore. Well rounded in well played. The special effects were very captivating. 7/10 because the movie gave me what I came for, I was entertained for two hours but I was not blown away.
Almost impossible to keep up with what was going on! Just jumped from one thing to the next with no development, such a shame
Watching this gives you the sense that nobody really knew where to go after the first film ended... and it shows. Beautiful film with a great cast, but an ultimately pointless story that sort of flops around like a dead fish not quite aware yet that its dead. This film is disappointing and forgettable.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJohnny Depp signed on without reading a script. He wanted to be a part of the series because he is a self-proclaimed massive fan of the series.
- GaffesAccording to the books and Pottermore.com (site created by JK Rowling herself), Minerva McGonagall was born in 1935 and first started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956, when she was 21 years old. Even though the movie is set in 1927, eight years before her birth, she appears as a young professor in Hogwarts.
- Citations
Leta Lestrange: Oh, Newt. You never met a monster you couldn't love.
- Crédits fousThere are no mid- or end-credit scenes.
- Versions alternativesAn extended cut runs ~7 minutes longer.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald
- Lieux de tournage
- Lacock Abbey, Lacock, Chippenham, Wiltshire, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(Hogwarts School)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 200 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 159 555 901 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 62 163 104 $US
- 18 nov. 2018
- Montant brut mondial
- 655 755 901 $US
- Durée
- 2h 14min(134 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant