NOTE IMDb
7,0/10
15 k
MA NOTE
Une histoire de Ludmila Pavlichenko, la tireuse d'élite féminine la plus réussie de l'histoire.Une histoire de Ludmila Pavlichenko, la tireuse d'élite féminine la plus réussie de l'histoire.Une histoire de Ludmila Pavlichenko, la tireuse d'élite féminine la plus réussie de l'histoire.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 10 victoires et 23 nominations au total
Joan Blackham
- Eleanor Roosevelt
- (as Dzhoan Blekkhem)
Avis à la une
It's a weird time to see a joint Ukrainian and Russian film project to come out, considering the breakdown in relations between the two countries. The production apparently begun before the conflict, and it's an achievement in itself that it's been seen through, since a project like this probably wouldn't be possible today.
Coming in the wake of Russian WWII-themed schlock like Stalingrad (2013), I didn't expect too much, and there was a somewhat similar, almost gaudy quality present, but overall the movie was much more decent, particularly considering that its budget was about 5 times smaller than Stalingrad's. The actors were well cast, with Yuliya Peresild's performance creating a main character that can grow on you, and some interesting supporting characters. This brings me to the point that, despite the title, the movie's focus isn't as much on the port city of Sevastopol as it's on the Soviet sniper Lyudmila Pavlichenko, and the movie being called "Battle for Sevastopol" betrays an apparent lack of confidence in selling a biopic of a female sniper. There's a fair amount of action in the movie, however, so I don't think that the kind of people who wouldn't go for a biopic would come away disappointed or feeling mislead.
Coming in the wake of Russian WWII-themed schlock like Stalingrad (2013), I didn't expect too much, and there was a somewhat similar, almost gaudy quality present, but overall the movie was much more decent, particularly considering that its budget was about 5 times smaller than Stalingrad's. The actors were well cast, with Yuliya Peresild's performance creating a main character that can grow on you, and some interesting supporting characters. This brings me to the point that, despite the title, the movie's focus isn't as much on the port city of Sevastopol as it's on the Soviet sniper Lyudmila Pavlichenko, and the movie being called "Battle for Sevastopol" betrays an apparent lack of confidence in selling a biopic of a female sniper. There's a fair amount of action in the movie, however, so I don't think that the kind of people who wouldn't go for a biopic would come away disappointed or feeling mislead.
I was riveted by this movie and I don't understand any Russian! This movie is absolutely about Lyudmila Pavlichenko and her recollections than it is about the "Battle of Sevastopol" any more than the movie "Enemy at the Gates" being a portrayal of the scope of the Battle of Stalingrad versus the adventures of Vasili Zaitzev. I would love to see this with English subtitles but would rather leave it 100% as with the actors speaking their parts in their native voices rather than have it butchered by dubbing. While there is a little stereotyping of communist leaders and their acts and gestures, the movie puts a human and personal touch on the real fighters of the Soviet Union in WW2, the young people who have to do the real fighting and would rather just live their lives in peace.
Most "heroes" never wanted the spotlight and didn't do what they did for glory or fame. A moving and powerful movie.
Most "heroes" never wanted the spotlight and didn't do what they did for glory or fame. A moving and powerful movie.
Although it's mostly in Russian with subtitles, I was drawn in deeply and remained so throughout the duration. This is the most gripping WW2 film I've seen since Saving Private Ryan. The direction, acting, cinematography are all top notch. It tells the story of heroic Russian sniper without glamorizing war. Instead the horror of war is pervasive and though she is a survivor her story is tragic. It's also very interesting to get a glimpse of Stalin-era Soviet culture. It's a must see for anyone interested in WW2, history, biographies, or intense drama.
The producer was able to pull the Russia-Ukraine title all in one piece despite the events of 2014 in Kiev. Probably the bulk of the scenes was shot in 2013.
The storyline goes on about a true WW2 Red Army female sniper with the highest confirmed hit list ever. Check out the Wikipedia.
A sad personal drama wound into the 1941 context when Wehrmacht was advancing in Southern Ukraine, USSR.
With a moderate budget, as it appears to me, the makers were restricted to a moderate combined arms warfare footage, but of a very decent quality.
Most moving is the tragedy of the main character who lives through the first two years of war and a personal tragedy.
It is not a blockbuster action-filled war theme that must be a dangling carrot for a moviegoer but rather a biographical sniper daily routine and mentality.
On seeing the movie I was a bit puzzled why its name bears "Battle for Sevastopol" as it is only touched upon.
A mind-blowing alternative to the American Sniper. You decide on your own.
The storyline goes on about a true WW2 Red Army female sniper with the highest confirmed hit list ever. Check out the Wikipedia.
A sad personal drama wound into the 1941 context when Wehrmacht was advancing in Southern Ukraine, USSR.
With a moderate budget, as it appears to me, the makers were restricted to a moderate combined arms warfare footage, but of a very decent quality.
Most moving is the tragedy of the main character who lives through the first two years of war and a personal tragedy.
It is not a blockbuster action-filled war theme that must be a dangling carrot for a moviegoer but rather a biographical sniper daily routine and mentality.
On seeing the movie I was a bit puzzled why its name bears "Battle for Sevastopol" as it is only touched upon.
A mind-blowing alternative to the American Sniper. You decide on your own.
I would like to share with you my thoughts. First of all I loved the film. You get real war movie. The visuals was not really trouble. Although less spectacular element in it. Instead of a serious war drama I could compare the film. What WWII was transposed to the environment. The characters were well developed and realistic. Real emotion could be seen on their faces. What I liked even more the use of the camera. Very simple scenes have been able to make it interesting. It maintains the interest in the story. I would not compare this film to the film Enemy at the Gates. Those who look to a slower but more emotional love war drama to expect.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesContrary to the movie script, Lyudmila Pavlichenko was already married and had a son before war.
- GaffesMajor Pavlychenko's first kills and presumably a great deal more of them were with an SVT-40 rifle; the story depicts her first sniper kills and all the rest presented in the movie to be with the Mosin Nagant rifle.
- Citations
Lyudmila Pavlichenko: Gentlemen, I am 25 years old and I have killed 309 fascist invaders by now. Don't you think, gentlemen, that you have been hiding behind my back for too long?
- ConnexionsReferenced in Vecherniy Urgant: Laima Vaikule (2015)
- Bandes originalesKukushka
Music by Viktor Tsoy
Lyrics by Viktor Tsoy
Performed by Polina Gagarina
Arranged by Konstantin Meladze
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Battle for Sevastopol?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- La bataille de Sebastopol
- Lieux de tournage
- Sevastopol, Crimea, Russie(Sevastopol, Crimea, Ukraine)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 9 104 504 $US
- Durée1 heure 50 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant