NOTE IMDb
2,7/10
3,3 k
MA NOTE
Un groupe de personnes est plongé dans un labyrinthe sombre et claustrophobe, où il doit se battre pour survivre, sous le regard du monde extérieur.Un groupe de personnes est plongé dans un labyrinthe sombre et claustrophobe, où il doit se battre pour survivre, sous le regard du monde extérieur.Un groupe de personnes est plongé dans un labyrinthe sombre et claustrophobe, où il doit se battre pour survivre, sous le regard du monde extérieur.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Gale Harold
- Julian
- (as Gale Morgan Harold III)
Elettra Dallimore Mallaby
- Woman in White
- (as Elettra Mallaby)
Marysia S. Peres
- Slave Woman
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
My quick rating - 3,2/10. Well, not the WORST movie I have ever seen, but pretty awful. A group of really bad actors I mean, slaves, are put in some dungeon and must fight there way out.They call it a maze yet always seem to know where things are. Anyway, the group faces a madman (Alec Baldwin, who must've lost a bet and dragged Danny Glover into this mess) that is trying to eliminate their spirit for a game show? I think I have it right. Hard to tell but for some reason the "bad guys" who can shoot lightning from their hands and morph their bodies tend to resort to fist fighting for no apparent reason. Of course, a couple of the detainees are poor martial artists, but that goes without saying (or they are good martial artists who are choreographed so poorly that their sensai will be furious this was ever filmed). I really don't know if their is much redeeming about this movie and if I didn't use gut instinct on my rating, reflecting as I type this, I almost want to knock it down even lower. Don't bother since there are plenty of decent to good movies out there waiting for you.
This movie is SO bad, that it needs to get some kind of recognition with at least a short review. In my life I've seen many, many bad movies, but believe me, even in the worst cases I would always find a reason to finish it...maybe a bit of curiosity, or just to see HOW low it could go, or by just telling myself that if I had already wasted one hour of my life, why not making it one and a half and see if there was a remote chance it got (dare I say it?) 'better'? But this one was just too much, I stopped it 40 minutes in and never turned back. For some reason, I had not checked IMDb's ratings before, but I certainly did after, and it's funny to realize that I have now spent more time on the film's page on IMDb than watching the movie itself. Yes, it's THAT bad.
I'm sure I won't be the only person asking the question whether Alec Baldwin and Danny Glover really needed a paycheck that badly to be in this catastrophe of a movie? After selecting it from Redbox, I came home and saw the 2.8 rating on IMDb and knew I was in big trouble.
I could go on and on writing how on so many levels this film is abysmal. Let's just say I found the "plot" to be a convoluted mess, the emotionless acting left me uncaring about any of the characters, and I would have turned it off much earlier but I stuck it out, I imagine, to write this review.
All in all, just a very painful hour and a half.
I could go on and on writing how on so many levels this film is abysmal. Let's just say I found the "plot" to be a convoluted mess, the emotionless acting left me uncaring about any of the characters, and I would have turned it off much earlier but I stuck it out, I imagine, to write this review.
All in all, just a very painful hour and a half.
Baldwin and Glover only had cameos. (Thankfully, as both of them suck) Any more than that and it would rate a ZERO! (I wish that rating was an option on IMDb)
That's all I have, but I MUST type 10 lines... so here are the remaining lines.
This movie really sucks.
This movie will take away time from your life that you will never be able to get back.
Why does IMDb force us to write more than is necessary?
My first 2 sentences were sufficient to make my point.
This line is completely pointless and unnecessary.
That's all I have, but I MUST type 10 lines... so here are the remaining lines.
This movie really sucks.
This movie will take away time from your life that you will never be able to get back.
Why does IMDb force us to write more than is necessary?
My first 2 sentences were sufficient to make my point.
This line is completely pointless and unnecessary.
I would rate andron as a -1 but i give them the credit of at least putting this reject of the hunger games wannabe together somewhat and getting Danny Glover and Alec Baldwin to star in it unconvincingly!!
From the trailer i sense this is a made for sci fi channel or cloo , Sunday night at 8pm TV special! it is so mind boggingly bad that my sense of even writing a review for it is leaving a bad taste in my mouth!
From the opening of them not remembering where they are , then getting chased and followed by the upstarts who think this game isn't fair sounds familiar anyone.
Please you have been warned don't watch!!!!!
From the trailer i sense this is a made for sci fi channel or cloo , Sunday night at 8pm TV special! it is so mind boggingly bad that my sense of even writing a review for it is leaving a bad taste in my mouth!
From the opening of them not remembering where they are , then getting chased and followed by the upstarts who think this game isn't fair sounds familiar anyone.
Please you have been warned don't watch!!!!!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesShot in only 21 days.
- GaffesNear the end, when Eleanor is defeated, Valerie picks up a device on the floor and say :" it's the neuro-chip". In fact, it's a simple variable resistor of brand "Piher".
- ConnexionsReferences Le Magicien d'Oz (1939)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Andron?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Andron
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 40min(100 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant