[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Realive

  • 2016
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 52min
NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
5,7 k
MA NOTE
Realive (2016)
Marc (Tom Hughes) is diagnosed with a disease and is given one year left to live. Unable to accept his own end, he decides to freeze his body. Sixty years later, in the year 2084, he becomes the first man to be revived in history. It is then he discovers that the love of his life, Naomi (Oona Chaplin), has accompanied him this entire time in a way that he'd never expected.
Lire trailer2:08
4 Videos
19 photos
DrameScience-fiction

Marc va mourir d'un cancer. Il choisit d'être cryogénisé et espère être décongelé quand sa maladie pourra être soignée. Il est le premier humain ramené 68 ans plus tard. Peut-il s'adapter me... Tout lireMarc va mourir d'un cancer. Il choisit d'être cryogénisé et espère être décongelé quand sa maladie pourra être soignée. Il est le premier humain ramené 68 ans plus tard. Peut-il s'adapter mentalement et physiquement?Marc va mourir d'un cancer. Il choisit d'être cryogénisé et espère être décongelé quand sa maladie pourra être soignée. Il est le premier humain ramené 68 ans plus tard. Peut-il s'adapter mentalement et physiquement?

  • Réalisation
    • Mateo Gil
  • Scénario
    • Mateo Gil
  • Casting principal
    • Oona Chaplin
    • Charlotte Le Bon
    • Tom Hughes
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,9/10
    5,7 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Mateo Gil
    • Scénario
      • Mateo Gil
    • Casting principal
      • Oona Chaplin
      • Charlotte Le Bon
      • Tom Hughes
    • 50avis d'utilisateurs
    • 49avis des critiques
    • 59Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 3 victoires et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos4

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    Official Trailer
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:59
    Official Trailer
    Teaser Trailer #1
    Trailer 0:41
    Teaser Trailer #1

    Photos18

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 12
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux39

    Modifier
    Oona Chaplin
    Oona Chaplin
    • Naomi
    Charlotte Le Bon
    Charlotte Le Bon
    • Elizabeth
    Tom Hughes
    Tom Hughes
    • Marc Jarvis
    Barry Ward
    Barry Ward
    • West
    Rafael Cebrián
    Rafael Cebrián
    • Jeffrey
    Melina Matthews
    Melina Matthews
    • Technician
    Daniel Horvath
    Daniel Horvath
    • Surgeon
    Nikol Kollars
    Nikol Kollars
    • Dr. Gethers
    Alex Hafner
    Alex Hafner
    • The Elderly Hornball
    Tony Corvillo
    Tony Corvillo
    • Surgeon 3
    Alexandra Szucs
    Alexandra Szucs
    • Sandy
    Godeliv Van den Brandt
    • Sigourney
    Julio Perillán
    Julio Perillán
    • Dr. Serra
    Karina Matas Piper
    Karina Matas Piper
    • Pretty Young Woman
    Oscar Dorta
    Oscar Dorta
    • Reanimated
    Saras Gil
    • Andrea
    Frida Palsson
    Frida Palsson
    • Surgeon 2
    Mark Schardan
    Mark Schardan
    • Oncologist
    • Réalisation
      • Mateo Gil
    • Scénario
      • Mateo Gil
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs50

    5,95.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    3vrajabhumi

    Do not expect a good sci-fi, expect a pedantic drag.

    I didn't read any reviews or see a trailer before watching so I had no preconceptions. Afterwards after reading the other 4 reviews I wondered what the really good reviews saw in this film. My guess is that maybe they expected a film that was less competently made, or maybe they expected a less serious film - and were surprised at how well made and serious this was. My guess also is that the obvious flaws of the film were overlooked or not noticed by them because of how well put together it is, just a guess. The problems with this film outweigh the good production and good story. Those problems are: the slow pacing; repetitiveness; morose lead actor; lack of anything stimulating and generally a drag. To give an analogy I would compare this to a college lecture by a really smart teacher who is really good at explaining the lessons but is dry and pedantic and puts students to sleep vs. an entertaining teacher who keeps students on the edge of their seats. While I am not asking this movie to be Transformers, still the script needed much more work before this was made. The story is interesting and with I imagine a limited budget they were able to pull off an impressive production, but with a boring script it ends up being a waste of time since it is so repetitive and really does not go far enough story wise. This would have worked well as the first 40 minutes of a different story, as it stands it will leave most people cold and few will stay to the end, and if they do most of them will regret it since nothing exciting or entertaining ever happens. It moves slowly and dull till the end.
    9alisonc-1

    The Perils of Reanimation

    Marc Jarvis (Tom Hughes) is a rich, young, successful artist who is suddenly told that he has cancer and has at most a year to live. He decides to freeze his body in the hopes that future medicine can cure him, but his girlfriend Naomi (Oona Chaplin) is horrified that he means to take his own life in order to ensure that his body is in as good condition as possible when he dies. Nevertheless, he does just that… only to wake up some 60 years later; Dr. West (Barry Ward) and his team have learned, through trial and error, how to reanimate frozen humans. Marc is their first complete success, and with the help of nurse/assistant Elizabeth (Charlotte Le Bon), Marc struggles to find meaning in his new existence, while his long-ago past still pulls at his heart…. I'm not sure why this is a Spanish film as it's in English and features British actors; but, no matter. It's a really thoughtful science fiction film that addresses not only technological advances but the moral and ethical problems associated with them. I very much liked Tom Hughes (who looks a bit like Cillian Murphy) because he was able to take his character through a very complex maze of emotional realities; then again, everybody in this film is good. Interestingly, the problem of how to portray the future was solved by simply having Marc remain in the facility in which he was reborn, because his body was not strong enough (yet) to adapt to outside conditions; a neat explanation that means the viewer isn't taken out of the picture by seeing a future world that looks cheesy or contrived or otherwise unnatural. Well done, filmmakers!
    4arefin-67466

    A Simple waste of time!

    It's more of a sad love story than a sci-fi!! Lack of drama, poorly written characters!!
    6ulicknormanowen

    Seconds

    Ambitious, not often successful story of a young man who made his way of life triumphantly,and who ,terminally-ill ,chooses cryogenic freeze , to be able to "realive" in the future when the science,in the shape of Dr West (a nod to the excellent "re-animator " feat. Jeffrey Combs ), is able to give him a second chance in another era .

    Although there's numerous hints at religion (the Lazarus project :"lazarus ,come forth !"), the fact that immortality may make gain another world but lose your soul ;in fact ,you want to find back what you've lost , but time moves like a jet plane and it's a brand new world you have to face .

    Thanks to a brand new technology ,you can record your memories (why not? A hundred years ago ,who would have thought of the computering revolution? ),but those memories are a jumble,for they come from every moment of your life ( cruelty to animals -the lizard and the hen-is gratuitous and pointless);besides , Naomi ,to do what she does ,must have experimented l'amour fou and nothing really shows it (unless a would be torrid sex scene counts);besides, Marc's impossibility to adapt himself to another way of life (the new sex lib is not that much new ,it recalls the hippies) is not fully exploited :it was already brillantly treated in Frankenheimer's sensational film ,"seconds"(1966)

    This film is interesting but it is mainly a missed golden opportunity.
    6littleitaly-71510

    More philosophy than sci-fi, true, but not lacking in the sci either

    So, a lot of people went into this movie expecting to be dazzled by hi- tech conceptualizations of the future, and were disappointed. That's understandable. The tech is a background at best, although every character does seem to blend seamlessly with it. It is a background that is tastefully crafted, realistically employed and never flickers.

    To add insult to injury, however, the 2 hour hypotech is stuffed with sentimentality and philosophy, rather than action and sex, as many sci- fi's are. For most people, action and sex are a far better filler than the heartfelt musings of a struggling soul, regardless of the context.

    For those of us not seeking to escape to the future, we were treated to a salient, cerebral wine-tasting, of sorts...and a sobering one at that. The film seems to offer up so many spiritual, cultural messages, from so many vantage points, that it's impossible to label one bottle and drink from it. For the single-minded it's a mess. For others, it's an awakening to new flavors of suffering, and a perversion of our taste buds. Some things, once sweet on our tongue, now stain with an aftertaste. Other drinks, like death, may now crisply tinkle in the glass and repel us a bit less.

    All I'm saying is that this film is more art than entertainment. Some people drink wine to get drunk and have sex. Others sip it carefully to explore its variety. Realive is certainly a film for the sipping class.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Rememory
    6,1
    Rememory
    Message from the King
    6,4
    Message from the King
    Le secret des banquises
    5,2
    Le secret des banquises
    Anchor and Hope
    6,3
    Anchor and Hope
    Purgatorio
    4,8
    Purgatorio
    Dancing for My Havana
    6,1
    Dancing for My Havana
    Blair Witch
    5,0
    Blair Witch
    The Incident
    4,6
    The Incident
    Iris
    6,1
    Iris
    Soirée filles
    4,7
    Soirée filles
    Nocturne
    5,7
    Nocturne
    The Laureate
    5,2
    The Laureate

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The protagonist reminisces about a movie he'd seen, in which Lazarus resents being brought back to life by Jesus. For this flashback, the movie uses a clip from the 1988 film "The Last Temptation of Christ," starring Willem Dafoe. Later, during the fundraising scene at the garden party, Dafoe can be spotted in a cameo as one of the applauding patrons.
    • Citations

      Marc Jarvis: I don't know.

      Marc Jarvis: There is only one thing I can see clearly now.

      Marc Jarvis: Life is nothing more than state of matter.

      Marc Jarvis: Like a gas. Or liquid.

      Marc Jarvis: A form of molecular organisation.

      Marc Jarvis: And there's nothing transcendent or devine about it.

      Marc Jarvis: It's only objective is to perpetuate itself through motion, change, adaptation.

      Marc Jarvis: Life isn't worried about any species. Much or less, any individual.

      Marc Jarvis: We are nothing more than the chunks of mud that uses it as a vehicle.

      Marc Jarvis: Life is what's scary. Not death.

      Marc Jarvis: But it's always on the verge of extinction.

      Marc Jarvis: But it exists wherever it shouldn't.

      Marc Jarvis: And the soul, you may ask, what about the soul?

      Marc Jarvis: Well, maybe the soul is the bit that gets lost when you freeze the meat and then thought out again.

    • Bandes originales
      Deep Blue
      Lyrics & Music by Mark Peters, Elliot Ireland and Alessandro Rizzo

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ

    • How long is Realive?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 6 juin 2018 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Belgique
      • Espagne
      • France
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Tái Sinh
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Tenerife, Canary Islands, Espagne(location)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Arcadia Motion Pictures
      • Achaman Films AIE
      • Canal+ España
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 7 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 125 680 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 52 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.