Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with ... Tout lireWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.When two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.
Avis à la une
The only way to approach independent movies is with a healthy dose of forgiveness. But, maybe due to technology, the basic level of proficiency has made many super watchable.
The picture wastes no time getting into the story, avoiding the weak beginning endemic to many self made projects. Richard and Bill are working on a technology that can record memories and allow them to be "re-experienced". Richard's wife Hadley is the guinea pig.
Bill is established as an anti-social, anti-technology genius reluctant to share the code even with his business partner. Richard is an angry, controlling brute, establishing the conflict.
We mostly follow Bill, who is confused, though not as much as his father who has dementia. A session with a therapist establishes Bill lost a wife and child in an accident he has trouble remembering. This plus his déjà vu and persecution complex might be what lead him to fear the memory technology, leading to an affair with Hadley and a confrontation with Richard.
The performances are serviceable, though the story arcs are not involved - characters intensify rather than change. Still, no one does anything stupid or unbelievable to forward the plot. The main flaw is a lack of tight editing which most indies contend with. The scenes of Bill's confusion with reality could easily be cut in half. The ending meets the ideal of being both surprising yet inevitable. If Hitchcock had done science fiction, this is the kind of ending he would have adored.
If this was truly done on $5,000, it's a brilliant job.
I'm not a big fan of indie movies, but this one brought me in and intrigued me. The production (especially on a no budget) was remarkable! The acting was excellent and the story kept giving us turns.
Well done!
Acting was decent for a low budget flick. The movie had some great ideas, but they're not fully developed at all. Instead, we see the hint of some of those ideas repeatedly given over and over. Nauseatingly so.
Editing is a severe problem in the movie. The vast majority of it could have been excised and it would have been a far better movie. As it stands, it is best watched on fast forward with some parts skipped entirely.
I have this movie 4 stars because of the hints I mentioned above. I honestly don't understand why the director didn't develop any of those ideas. Some could have easily been done on the cheap.
I would recommend this movie for people who are looking for science fiction ideas to develop; for those who love literal science fiction (and don't mind having to fast forward), and low budget directors looking too see how others have done it.
People wanting action sci-fi, big budget flicks, or cohesive/well scripted movies... give this one a pass
People wanting action sci-fi, big budget flicks, or cohesive/well scripted movies... give this one a pass
I thought it was a great movie for what it was since it appears that it had a shoestring budget. But not having money to spend doesn't make this a don't watch. I think not having a budget makes the execution of this so much better
Bill (the lead character) has got to be the worst actor I've had the misfortune to watch. He just walks around as if he's spaced out. The lights are on but no one home. The lead woman is equally as bad. How they both get work is beyond me. There are so many unacceptable breaks in dialogue (dead air) if the actors were up to it maybe , but the fact it had little budget doesn't impress me as it's so bad it shouldn't have been made in the first place.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 $US (estimé)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant