[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
IMDbPro

Panopticon

  • 2016
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 36min
NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
58
MA NOTE
Panopticon (2016)
DrameMystèreScience-fictionThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with ... Tout lireWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.When two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.

  • Réalisation
    • Jeff Thelen
  • Scénario
    • Jeff Thelen
  • Casting principal
    • Joshua Berwald
    • Farzana Virani
    • Aron Price
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,5/10
    58
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Jeff Thelen
    • Scénario
      • Jeff Thelen
    • Casting principal
      • Joshua Berwald
      • Farzana Virani
      • Aron Price
    • 8avis d'utilisateurs
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos6

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 2
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux20

    Modifier
    Joshua Berwald
    Joshua Berwald
    • Bill
    Farzana Virani
    • Hadley
    Aron Price
    • Richard
    Anthony Abbott
    • Bartender
    Greg Berwald
    • Doctor
    Levi Burdick
    Levi Burdick
    • Duncan
    Dylan Cox
    • Young Bill
    Greg Fitzgerald
    • Thug
    Jacki Flynn
    • Bartender
    Josh Henry
    Josh Henry
    • GoogleHead
    Amanda Lewis
    • Carrie
    Wren Lewis
    • Fay
    John Pennington
    • Smith
    Michael Ramos
    • Bar Flirt
    Cherie Restler
    • Bill's Mom
    Joel Rogers
    Joel Rogers
    • Old Frank…
    Arden Rowland
    • The Woman
    Jake Scott-Hodes
    • Bar Patron
    • Réalisation
      • Jeff Thelen
    • Scénario
      • Jeff Thelen
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs8

    5,558
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    8spicspic

    Has all the hallmarks of a classic...

    The only way to approach independent movies is with a healthy dose of forgiveness. But, maybe due to technology, the basic level of proficiency has made many super watchable. The picture wastes no time getting into the story, avoiding the weak beginning endemic to many self made projects. Richard and Bill are working on a technology that can record memories and allow them to be "re-experienced". Richard's wife Hadley is the guinea pig. Bill is established as an anti-social, anti-technology genius reluctant to share the code even with his business partner. Richard is an angry, controlling brute, establishing the conflict. We mostly follow Bill, who is confused, though not as much as his father who has dementia. A session with a therapist establishes Bill lost a wife and child in an accident he has trouble remembering. This plus his déjà vu and persecution complex might be what lead him to fear the memory technology, leading to an affair with Hadley and a confrontation with Richard. The performances are serviceable, though the story arcs are not involved - characters intensify rather than change. Still, no one does anything stupid or unbelievable to forward the plot. The main flaw is a lack of tight editing which most indies contend with. The scenes of Bill's confusion with reality could easily be cut in half. The ending meets the ideal of being both surprising yet inevitable. If Hitchcock had done science fiction, this is the kind of ending he would have adored. If this was truly done on $5,000, it's a brilliant job.
    8qwopasklzxm

    Wasn't sure, but really liked it.

    I'm not a big fan of indie movies, but this one brought me in and intrigued me. The production (especially on a no budget) was remarkable! The acting was excellent and the story kept giving us turns. Well done!
    4imrational

    promising ideas drowned in poor editing

    Acting was decent for a low budget flick. The movie had some great ideas, but they're not fully developed at all. Instead, we see the hint of some of those ideas repeatedly given over and over. Nauseatingly so. Editing is a severe problem in the movie. The vast majority of it could have been excised and it would have been a far better movie. As it stands, it is best watched on fast forward with some parts skipped entirely. I have this movie 4 stars because of the hints I mentioned above. I honestly don't understand why the director didn't develop any of those ideas. Some could have easily been done on the cheap. I would recommend this movie for people who are looking for science fiction ideas to develop; for those who love literal science fiction (and don't mind having to fast forward), and low budget directors looking too see how others have done it.

    People wanting action sci-fi, big budget flicks, or cohesive/well scripted movies... give this one a pass
    7ertpecs

    Pretty good flick considering there obviously was about 5 bucks as a budget

    I thought it was a great movie for what it was since it appears that it had a shoestring budget. But not having money to spend doesn't make this a don't watch. I think not having a budget makes the execution of this so much better
    1lopezpatricia-06139

    Literally the worst film I've ever seen

    Bill (the lead character) has got to be the worst actor I've had the misfortune to watch. He just walks around as if he's spaced out. The lights are on but no one home. The lead woman is equally as bad. How they both get work is beyond me. There are so many unacceptable breaks in dialogue (dead air) if the actors were up to it maybe , but the fact it had little budget doesn't impress me as it's so bad it shouldn't have been made in the first place.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Panoptikoni
    7,8
    Panoptikoni

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Sites officiels
      • Official site
      • Official Website
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Atlanta, Géorgie, États-Unis
    • Société de production
      • Quixotic Arts
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 5 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 36 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.