amanrajabali
A rejoint juin 2017
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours d’élaboration. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines des fonctionnalités manquantes reviendront bientôt. Restez à l’écoute pour leur retour. En attendant, des notes est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur de profil. Pour voir votre ou vos distributions d’évaluation par année et genre, veuillez consulter notre nouvelle section Guide d’aide.
Badges3
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d’aide sur les badges.
Évaluations1,4 k
Évaluation de amanrajabali
Commentaires60
Évaluation de amanrajabali
This film is a significant and relevant film that brings to life Jyotirao and Savitribai Phule's inspiring vision - social reform and education pioneers of 19th-century India.
The film succeeds in depicting the oppression they confronted and the bravery it required to speak up for change in the face of aggression.
The performances are genuine, the period description is good, and the message remains intensely relevant even today.
But I couldn't help but miss the presence of a greater representation of Fatima Sheikh - one of India's first Muslim women teachers and a crucial collaborator in the Phules' mission.
Her role is underwritten and doesn't get the depth it rightly deserves.
Fatima Sheikh wasn't just a bystander; she was an equal participant in revolutionising education among the oppressed.
I had initially given this film a 9/10 because of the sheer significance of its subject matter, but I took away 2 points precisely because justice has not been done to Fatima Sheikh's legacy.
Representation is important, and it's crucial that the contributions of all change-makers, particularly those traditionally marginalised, are laid out in their entirety.
Sure, Phule is a worthwhile watch.
It teaches, it makes you think, and it does justice to the legacies of two mighty thinkers.
If only the third one had been included.
The film succeeds in depicting the oppression they confronted and the bravery it required to speak up for change in the face of aggression.
The performances are genuine, the period description is good, and the message remains intensely relevant even today.
But I couldn't help but miss the presence of a greater representation of Fatima Sheikh - one of India's first Muslim women teachers and a crucial collaborator in the Phules' mission.
Her role is underwritten and doesn't get the depth it rightly deserves.
Fatima Sheikh wasn't just a bystander; she was an equal participant in revolutionising education among the oppressed.
I had initially given this film a 9/10 because of the sheer significance of its subject matter, but I took away 2 points precisely because justice has not been done to Fatima Sheikh's legacy.
Representation is important, and it's crucial that the contributions of all change-makers, particularly those traditionally marginalised, are laid out in their entirety.
Sure, Phule is a worthwhile watch.
It teaches, it makes you think, and it does justice to the legacies of two mighty thinkers.
If only the third one had been included.
Utterly atrocious.
That's the most polite way I can describe Revolver Rani.
The film is a complete mess from start to finish - an unbearable experience that tested my patience to the limit.
It felt as though the entire team was half asleep while making it.
The story is weak, the screenplay worse, and the editing is a disaster.
The actors - many of whom are usually capable - seem to have delivered the worst performances of their careers.
If there were an award for collectively bad acting, this cast would win it hands down.
I eventually resorted to watching the film in fast-forward mode, just to get it over with.
The only relief came when the end credits finally rolled. Phew!
What a disappointment.
That's the most polite way I can describe Revolver Rani.
The film is a complete mess from start to finish - an unbearable experience that tested my patience to the limit.
It felt as though the entire team was half asleep while making it.
The story is weak, the screenplay worse, and the editing is a disaster.
The actors - many of whom are usually capable - seem to have delivered the worst performances of their careers.
If there were an award for collectively bad acting, this cast would win it hands down.
I eventually resorted to watching the film in fast-forward mode, just to get it over with.
The only relief came when the end credits finally rolled. Phew!
What a disappointment.
I watched Mr. Church with no expectations, and I'm glad I did.
It's a slightly slow-paced film, but in a way that allows the story and emotions to unfold gently.
The sentimentality and drama are well-balanced, making it a touching watch.
Eddie Murphy delivers a calm, composed, and beautifully controlled performance as Mr. Church.
It's a refreshing departure from his usual roles, and he brings a quiet strength and warmth to the character that stays with you.
This is a film best enjoyed on a peaceful weekend evening - it won't thrill you, but it will definitely touch your heart.
A simple, soulful story about unexpected bonds and lasting impact.
It's a slightly slow-paced film, but in a way that allows the story and emotions to unfold gently.
The sentimentality and drama are well-balanced, making it a touching watch.
Eddie Murphy delivers a calm, composed, and beautifully controlled performance as Mr. Church.
It's a refreshing departure from his usual roles, and he brings a quiet strength and warmth to the character that stays with you.
This is a film best enjoyed on a peaceful weekend evening - it won't thrill you, but it will definitely touch your heart.
A simple, soulful story about unexpected bonds and lasting impact.