Congonhas: Tragédia Anunciada

As a pilot, I'm always keen to watch every new aviation documentary. Unfortunately, they often disappoint me-most of the time due to a lack of professionalism and, I assume, proper aviation consultants, especially when it comes to correct phraseology. This series, however, was the biggest disappointment I've ever experienced. And that wasn't because of some minor mistakes, but because of a blatant disregard for facts.

A simple aviation accident caused by human error. Of course with long list of contributing factors, as it always is, but still, simple accident. For the victims' families, it is a great tragedy, but a documentary shouldn't be biased by the emotions of people who, respectfully, are not aviation experts. Objectivity should be the main goal, not the presentation of unsubstantiated theories made by outraged individuals who have lost loved ones. Of course, it's important to show the human tragedy of the accident, but in documentary it shouldn't affect objective judgment.

Three aviation experts, including a TAM captain, were the only ones who sounded reasonable and stuck to the facts, avoiding unsupported allegations. It is truly disappointing that their professional opinions were not the foundation of this series. Instead, Netflix chose to create a clickable, sensationalist series full of unsubstantiated claims and unprofessional commentary.

I strongly encourage everyone to watch Mentour Pilot's episode on this tragedy. It is unbiased, fact-based, and overall well-made (with a small fraction of Netflix's budget).

If they have kept their focus only on the victims' parents and relatives stories, this documentary would be powerful and great.

But the writer and the director (and maybe even the producers) decided to work with a broader and super complex script, squeezing a huge amount of information into just two episodes.

A lot of stuff is unnecessary repeated when they try to explain the whole story and put some facts in the context of the accident. In other hand, some crucial points of the accident were mentioned but weren't explained at all - and I want to believe this happened due bad scripting management or research failures.

Last but not least, why the heck they decided to keep a lot of time focusing on Denise Abreu? What about the other bigwigs that were mentioned just for a few seconds? What about explain in details why the TAM Linhas Aéreas pilots usually adopted a very different procedure then that one reccomended by Airbus?

An important series that shows how Brazil is - and always has been - a country where impunity reigns, justice is nonexistent, and the powerful are never held accountable for their mistakes, incompetence, or negligence. The justice system is complicit, slow, inefficient - and it enables impunity, forgetfulness, and the repetition of preventable tragedies.

I still remember that accident to this day; it left a mark on many people. As usual, the justice system turned its back on the victims and their families. It's powerful to see a documentary that keeps their memory alive and makes us reflect on the country we live in - where so much pain is ignored.

Don't waste your time. This documentary is terrible. They only explain the accident in the last 25 minutes of the final episode. Its purpose is to create cheap sensationalism and push a political agenda in favor of the government.

Most of the content is filled with irrelevant interviews and dramatic reenactments that add nothing of value. Instead of focusing on facts and technical explanations, the series spends hours building a narrative designed to manipulate political opinions rather than inform the audience.

It feels more like political propaganda than a serious investigation. If you're looking for a well-researched, objective account of what really happened, you're better off reading an article or watching a proper documentary that respects the viewer's intelligence.

The first episode starts off with a compelling tone, focusing on the human tragedy of the accident - highlighting the victims, their families, and including heartfelt interviews. It had all the elements of a respectful and impactful documentary. However, the series quickly derails after that. Instead of maintaining a balanced narrative, it dives headfirst into political propaganda.

From the second episode onward, it becomes less about the accident and more about pushing a one-sided political agenda. Most shockingly, it goes as far as portraying former Brazilian president Lula da Silva as some kind of national savior. The series absurdly credits him for economic improvements that supposedly led more people to fly, bizarrely framing that as a reason for the aviation crisis - conveniently removing any blame from his administration. Rather than holding power accountable, the series twists the narrative to elevate a political figure, turning a national tragedy into a campaign ad.