ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,1/10
8,1 k
MA NOTE
Un thriller centré sur un veuf qui emménage dans une nouvelle maison apparemment parfaite avec sa fille et sa nouvelle épouse.Un thriller centré sur un veuf qui emménage dans une nouvelle maison apparemment parfaite avec sa fille et sa nouvelle épouse.Un thriller centré sur un veuf qui emménage dans une nouvelle maison apparemment parfaite avec sa fille et sa nouvelle épouse.
Thomas R. Baker
- Locksmith with BUBAR Kit
- (uncredited)
Alex Daniels
- Cop
- (uncredited)
Christopher Frontiero
- Workman #2
- (uncredited)
Nick Leland
- Cop
- (uncredited)
Avis en vedette
I've seen this far too many times, so it took few scenes to realize what is it all about. At a certain point I even got annoyed cause it seemed to keep the plot a mystery, but I managed to stay there and wait for the end.
Glad I did so, cause surprisingly enough, it had something to offer indeed. A better, darker execution, a possible more real situation, of course, not all of it, but I did enjoy it. As movies like this have you root for certain characters, here I was drawn into the family and hoped everything would turn out OK.
Again, my experience in these kind of movies taught me well, so there were no real surprises even tho they did focus on that, but without naming the movies they took the ideas from, or spoiling it, I'm just gonna say that you could watch this and not be completely disappointed. On a scale from 1 to 10 I rated it 5, cause it did some things different. But mostly, the same moves you've seen for a lifetime.
Cheers!
Glad I did so, cause surprisingly enough, it had something to offer indeed. A better, darker execution, a possible more real situation, of course, not all of it, but I did enjoy it. As movies like this have you root for certain characters, here I was drawn into the family and hoped everything would turn out OK.
Again, my experience in these kind of movies taught me well, so there were no real surprises even tho they did focus on that, but without naming the movies they took the ideas from, or spoiling it, I'm just gonna say that you could watch this and not be completely disappointed. On a scale from 1 to 10 I rated it 5, cause it did some things different. But mostly, the same moves you've seen for a lifetime.
Cheers!
This movie was boring, too predictable, and unfinished scenes. Why did no one find the apple the creepy neighbour took a bite out of? What was the reasoning for that scene. Whatever happened to Hannah's cat?
Horrible ending!!!
Horrible ending!!!
Good movie. I thought this film was going to be a bad low budget horror thriller. But I really enjoyed it. It was abit predictable and that's fine tbh. I would definitely watch it again at some point. The acting was quite good. It's creepy at times. Couple of good jump scares. Some people will like it and some won't but I really liked it. I totally recommend people to give it a watch. The story isn't original but it don't really have to. 5/10
Not a bad movie, needed some direction. Also reminded me of the movie "The Boy". Also what happened to the cat???
This really had great potential to be something terrifying, but fell short. It was slowly building and giving a great story until it reached the last 30 minutes of the film. Everything felt quick and rushed, and you had to question if what the family was experiencing was paranormal or not for the first half of the film.
And one final question... Where the did Monty the cat go...
And one final question... Where the did Monty the cat go...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMisty Upham's last film.
- GaffesOne major flaw (among many) of this movie was the existence of wide spaces between the walls and floors that allowed our mystery villain to be able to move silently and easily between the attic and the other floors. Construction of homes in the last 50 years does away with these spaces, reserved for pipe chases and duct work.
- Générique farfeluThe end credits descend rather than ascend.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Half in the Bag: Shut in and Arrival (2016)
- Bandes originalesI Want It All
Written by Jules Larson and Rich Jacques
Performed by Jules Larson
Courtesy of Flying Trapexe Records
By arrangement with Secret Road Music Services, Inc.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Within?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 10 424 $ US
- Durée1 heure 28 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Crawlspace (2016) officially released in India in English?
Répondre