Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe documentary delves into Diddy's early years, his transformation from Sean Combs to Puffy and Diddy, the forces that shaped him, his childhood, music career, and the recent allegations of... Tout lireThe documentary delves into Diddy's early years, his transformation from Sean Combs to Puffy and Diddy, the forces that shaped him, his childhood, music career, and the recent allegations of sexual misconduct, challenging perceptions.The documentary delves into Diddy's early years, his transformation from Sean Combs to Puffy and Diddy, the forces that shaped him, his childhood, music career, and the recent allegations of sexual misconduct, challenging perceptions.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs
- Self
- (archive footage)
Kim Porter
- Self
- (archive footage)
Sara Rivers
- Self
- (as Sara Stokes)
Avis en vedette
This documentary seems to have prioritized style over substance, failing to deliver the thoughtful, insightful storytelling the subject demands.
From the tiresome editing choices to the build-up that leads nowhere, the film struggles to engage its audience meaningfully. The use of bleak music during inappropriate moments felt jarring, undermining the gravity of the issues being discussed. Instead of shedding light on Sean Combs' actions with clarity and respect for the victims, the documentary veers into unnecessary sensationalism and dramatization.
While it was compelling to hear directly from some of the victims, their voices were often overshadowed by the production's flashy attempts to stylize rather than humanize. This could have been an opportunity to provide a dignified platform for those impacted and focus on presenting facts and evidence that could contribute to justice. Instead, it felt like the filmmakers were more interested in amplifying shock value.
A more restrained and authentic approach, with longer, uninterrupted focus on the victims' stories, would have lent the documentary the gravity and impact it sorely lacks. This could have been an important piece of work-unfortunately, it missed the mark entirely.
From the tiresome editing choices to the build-up that leads nowhere, the film struggles to engage its audience meaningfully. The use of bleak music during inappropriate moments felt jarring, undermining the gravity of the issues being discussed. Instead of shedding light on Sean Combs' actions with clarity and respect for the victims, the documentary veers into unnecessary sensationalism and dramatization.
While it was compelling to hear directly from some of the victims, their voices were often overshadowed by the production's flashy attempts to stylize rather than humanize. This could have been an opportunity to provide a dignified platform for those impacted and focus on presenting facts and evidence that could contribute to justice. Instead, it felt like the filmmakers were more interested in amplifying shock value.
A more restrained and authentic approach, with longer, uninterrupted focus on the victims' stories, would have lent the documentary the gravity and impact it sorely lacks. This could have been an important piece of work-unfortunately, it missed the mark entirely.
The actual story of Diddy's life and allegations is intriguing and interesting - but this documentary only tells a a disjointed superficial tale with no depth, tabloid-like conspiracy theories and the very few actual facts and witnesses do not come across as believable or authentic. It seems the focus is on trying to create dramatic moments with audio/visual effects - but with a total lack of focus on substance.
To make matters worse - it is clearly cut for US television with constant "dramatic" cliff hangers to be placed just before commercials, followed by repetitive content to follow after the commercial break. I could live with it if the substance was there and the cliff hangers were actually exciting - but they are not. They just thought "let's put a commercial break here - and whatever we talk about just before, let's invent something dramatic". Yuk!
You also has to endure a constant dramatic soundtrack. At no time is there no dramatic music in the background.
There is so much subject matter in this case to make a good documentary - so how they have managed to screw this up so badly is quite a mystery.
To make matters worse - it is clearly cut for US television with constant "dramatic" cliff hangers to be placed just before commercials, followed by repetitive content to follow after the commercial break. I could live with it if the substance was there and the cliff hangers were actually exciting - but they are not. They just thought "let's put a commercial break here - and whatever we talk about just before, let's invent something dramatic". Yuk!
You also has to endure a constant dramatic soundtrack. At no time is there no dramatic music in the background.
There is so much subject matter in this case to make a good documentary - so how they have managed to screw this up so badly is quite a mystery.
As anyone with an IQ over 50 will realise, we live in an era of trial by mediia.
Add to that the socio-cultural misandrist agenda the media perpetuates, plenty of 'he said, she said' and you have a viable product in itself.
My main problem with this whole phenomenon is the man has not been found guilty of anything in court.
In this 'documentary' there are plenty of relative nobodies claiming to have knowledge of all manner of behaviour, which is damning in and of itself.
However I draw the line when: I don't have all the facts; it's Hollywood so whose agenda is on display here? And furthermore, until he is charged, I have no respect for this low quality type of 'investigative journalism'.
Whatever happened to ethics in the media?
Why do we allow one of the most powerful institutions on this planet to serve up sensationalist rumour and here-say?
A low, low point in the history of the media again.
I'm disgusted by not only the level of this, but the eagerness of the public to consume it and believe it.
'By giving us the opinions of the uneducated journalism keeps us in constant contact with the community.' Oscar Wilde.
Add to that the socio-cultural misandrist agenda the media perpetuates, plenty of 'he said, she said' and you have a viable product in itself.
My main problem with this whole phenomenon is the man has not been found guilty of anything in court.
In this 'documentary' there are plenty of relative nobodies claiming to have knowledge of all manner of behaviour, which is damning in and of itself.
However I draw the line when: I don't have all the facts; it's Hollywood so whose agenda is on display here? And furthermore, until he is charged, I have no respect for this low quality type of 'investigative journalism'.
Whatever happened to ethics in the media?
Why do we allow one of the most powerful institutions on this planet to serve up sensationalist rumour and here-say?
A low, low point in the history of the media again.
I'm disgusted by not only the level of this, but the eagerness of the public to consume it and believe it.
'By giving us the opinions of the uneducated journalism keeps us in constant contact with the community.' Oscar Wilde.
Unfortunately this documentary seems to have fallen down a sensationalist hole. There is a fair amount of what appears to be damning testimony and interesting context to Diddy, his background, rise and fall, but it's seemingly constantly embellished by hot takes about childhood trauma, conspiracy theories and at times some of the personalities don't exactly come across as genuine or authentic. The result is a tabloid-like doc that doesn't feel serious.
Hopefully things will be clearer when Diddy has his day in court. It's clear that he has done some extremely awful things (the assault of Cassie is both undeniable and inexcusable), but the documentary doesn't really do much to truly help us understand the extent of his deeds one way or the other.
Hopefully things will be clearer when Diddy has his day in court. It's clear that he has done some extremely awful things (the assault of Cassie is both undeniable and inexcusable), but the documentary doesn't really do much to truly help us understand the extent of his deeds one way or the other.
If 1/2 of this is true, give him day in court. Release ALL tapes, videos etc and taking him to the gallows
Either way he is a P. O. S. The way the rappers, gangsta's, hip hoppers and all the other so called "music" has created a culture that has not been beneficial to this or any society.
As far as this documentary goes, it seemed that a few of the interviewed appeared to be embellishing a little. What is true? Who knows, but we never did find any truths with Epstein.... Will we with Diddy Dipspit ? Doubt it.
Either way, there is the video outside the hotel room that shows the true color of this thug. ANY man that lays hands on a woman, let alone kicks her, should be beat themselves.
As far as this documentary goes, it seemed that a few of the interviewed appeared to be embellishing a little. What is true? Who knows, but we never did find any truths with Epstein.... Will we with Diddy Dipspit ? Doubt it.
Either way, there is the video outside the hotel room that shows the true color of this thug. ANY man that lays hands on a woman, let alone kicks her, should be beat themselves.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Дидди: Создание плохого парня
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 39 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the French language plot outline for Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy (2025)?
Répondre