Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods

When you see the allegations surface hardly a few days prior and already a full length documentary is already out? Reeks of propaganda and misinformation force-fed in a legal way as to make look authentic and factual. The real question remains who profits from these allegations and why now? Watch the documentary and you will not be left guessing about it's intent as to why sudden new allegations arise now when the accused can no longer defend himself. Just like the convenient death of dodi in a car crash in a tunnel where no one saw anything yet witnesses swear it was a car crash. Very very convenient to the elites.

Failed documentary maker Keaton Stone sacrifices innocent people to make his wife money and carve out a career for himself. The film is a disgrace-deeply immoral, sensationalist, and floored in its reasoning. It shows no regard for truth, relying instead on lazy research and manipulative editing. Stone's reckless ambition has caused real harm, all in the name of profit and prestige. A profoundly unethical piece of filmmaking that should never have been broadcast.

His actions reflect a growing trend in modern media: prioritising shock value over integrity, and careers over consequences, with innocent lives left in the wake.

Given intriguing subject matter of a very rich and powerful man, I had high hopes that BBC would do a better job, with the exception of interesting unrelated clips. Appears that the majority of the allegations were when Al-Fayed was in his 70's, and the accounts are straight from clichés of sexual assaults cookie cutter stories. Too convenient and highly most likely a sensational story at the expense of a prominent figure. Insulting to the viewer who anticipated a little more fact and collaborating evidence other than the thin ones we were given. No doubt the rich and powerful go hand in hand with corruption and bad behavior but a documentary has to make a more solid case to its viewers. Not sure why so many irrelevant clips of Al-Fayed and the opulence of the Harrods Dept store were in the documentary but that was the most interesting parts.

I had high hopes for "Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods," but it turned out to be a major letdown. The series felt more like a propaganda piece by the BBC rather than an objective documentary. The portrayal of Al Fayed was heavily skewed, lacking balance and fairness. It seemed like the series was pushing a particular narrative without giving viewers the full picture.

From the very beginning, the tone of the series was accusatory and one-sided. The documentary failed to provide a balanced view, neglecting to include perspectives that could have offered a more rounded understanding of Al Fayed's life and actions. Instead, it seemed intent on vilifying him, which undermined the credibility of the entire series.

The interviews and expert opinions featured in the series appeared to be selectively chosen to support a predetermined narrative. This approach not only felt manipulative but also disrespected the intelligence of the audience. A good documentary should present all sides of a story, allowing viewers to form their own opinions. Unfortunately, this series did not meet that standard.

Moreover, the production quality, while high, could not compensate for the lack of journalistic integrity. The dramatic reenactments and sensationalist editing further detracted from the documentary's credibility. It felt more like a tabloid piece than a serious investigative work.

"Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods" was a disappointing watch. It failed to provide a fair and balanced portrayal of its subject, instead opting for a biased and sensationalist approach. I expected more from the BBC, and this series did not live up to those expectations. I would not recommend it to anyone looking for an objective and thorough exploration of Al Fayed's life and legacy.