Cinq ans après Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), une expédition traverse des régions équatoriales isolées pour extraire l'ADN de trois créatures préhistoriques massives pour une avancée médic... Tout lireCinq ans après Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), une expédition traverse des régions équatoriales isolées pour extraire l'ADN de trois créatures préhistoriques massives pour une avancée médicale révolutionnaire.Cinq ans après Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), une expédition traverse des régions équatoriales isolées pour extraire l'ADN de trois créatures préhistoriques massives pour une avancée médicale révolutionnaire.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 6 nominations au total
Dylan Bickel
- Brooklyn Pedestrian
- (uncredited)
Sommaire
Reviewers praise 'Jurassic World: Rebirth' for its stunning visuals, impressive CGI, and thrilling dinosaur action sequences, bringing back the darker elements of the original Jurassic Park. The blend of horror with adventure and nostalgic nods to past films are appreciated. However, some criticize the weak plot, underdeveloped characters, and over-reliance on nostalgia. Despite these flaws, the film is seen as an entertaining and visually solid addition to the franchise.
Avis en vedette
I didn't go in with very high expectations, but this still should have been better considering David Koepp was returning as a writer and Gareth Edwards is a good choice for director. I even liked his 2014 Godzilla movie more than most people, so I am far from a hater.
I'll break this down into three pros and cons to keep this short.
Pros:
1) There are dinosaurs.
2) Some great location photography, especially in Thailand.
3) There are a couple of great moments of grandeur, although the best one for me (revealing a herd in a valley) relies on a lot of nostalgia farming. Still, it's effective. There's also a sequence with a raft that feels like Spielberg could have directed it, in a good way.
Cons:
1) The script is bad. Lots of exposition, despite the fact that the plot is very simplistic. Some of the characters are annoying. Everything is very predictable, to the point that there's really not a single surprise. There's little tension or sense of danger or even mystery.
2) The cast. Most of them seem to be here to collect a paycheck. Scarlett Johansson seems a little miscast for the character she's playing, though I'd still primarily blame the writing rather than her performance. Jonathan Bailey is a non-entity. Mahershala Ali is wasted. None of these characters are memorable. The best character is probably a tiny dinosaur they meet along the way that gets a few easy "aww" moments. It's cheap, but it works.
3) The special effects. As far as I could tell, the dinosaurs are 100% CGI (or close to it). Dominion was far from good but the mix of practical and CGI effects was nice to see, and a step in the right direction. I was hoping for more of that here, especially since there are several opportunities for practical effects once they get on the island. Everything looks artificial. It's also one of those movies where despite the great location photography, some of the environments still look really fake.
Anyway... the last three movies in this franchise have all been pretty bad. I don't expect something on par with the first Jurassic Park, but I think we could do a little better than this!
5/10.
I'll break this down into three pros and cons to keep this short.
Pros:
1) There are dinosaurs.
2) Some great location photography, especially in Thailand.
3) There are a couple of great moments of grandeur, although the best one for me (revealing a herd in a valley) relies on a lot of nostalgia farming. Still, it's effective. There's also a sequence with a raft that feels like Spielberg could have directed it, in a good way.
Cons:
1) The script is bad. Lots of exposition, despite the fact that the plot is very simplistic. Some of the characters are annoying. Everything is very predictable, to the point that there's really not a single surprise. There's little tension or sense of danger or even mystery.
2) The cast. Most of them seem to be here to collect a paycheck. Scarlett Johansson seems a little miscast for the character she's playing, though I'd still primarily blame the writing rather than her performance. Jonathan Bailey is a non-entity. Mahershala Ali is wasted. None of these characters are memorable. The best character is probably a tiny dinosaur they meet along the way that gets a few easy "aww" moments. It's cheap, but it works.
3) The special effects. As far as I could tell, the dinosaurs are 100% CGI (or close to it). Dominion was far from good but the mix of practical and CGI effects was nice to see, and a step in the right direction. I was hoping for more of that here, especially since there are several opportunities for practical effects once they get on the island. Everything looks artificial. It's also one of those movies where despite the great location photography, some of the environments still look really fake.
Anyway... the last three movies in this franchise have all been pretty bad. I don't expect something on par with the first Jurassic Park, but I think we could do a little better than this!
5/10.
Five years after the mess that was Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), we're back in the land of toothy nostalgia. This time, an expedition heads into remote equatorial regions to extract DNA from three colossal prehistoric creatures in the name of a "groundbreaking medical breakthrough."
Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are mercifully gone (finally), and in their place we get Scarlett Johansson, stepping in as the new face of the franchise for round seven of the Jurassic Park/World saga. Gareth Edwards takes the director's chair, and while he's always known how to stage a good spectacle, even his talents can't fully save this dino-soaked popcorn flick.
Let's talk visuals. There's certainly no shortage of giant set pieces and dinosaur mayhem-but when your dinosaurs look like glossy, overcooked cartoon rejects, all the action in the world can't make it feel real. Hollywood still hasn't learned that audiences are burnt out on soulless green-screen overloads, and the actors, forced to react to nothing, stumble through half-baked expressions of terror. You can practically see them wondering where the tennis ball on a stick went.
Character-wise, it's a wash. Most of them are either grating or entirely forgettable, spouting cringey, rapid-fire dialogue that exists solely to shuttle us from one set piece to the next. And while Rebirth does manage to attempt something new and different, it still feels like we're just circling the same prehistoric drain. It's entertaining, sure-but it just isn't that exciting.
That said, it's still a step up from Fallen Kingdom and Dominion, which isn't saying much, but at least it's something. At this point, though, it's time Universal grew a pair and gave us the R-rated, blood-splattered dinosaur horror epic we deserve-because the stakes never feel high when your carnivores are sanitized for mass consumption.
Here's hoping the next one finally evolves. But I'm not holding my breath. It's best to turn your brain off and enjoy this one for what it is.
6/10.
Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are mercifully gone (finally), and in their place we get Scarlett Johansson, stepping in as the new face of the franchise for round seven of the Jurassic Park/World saga. Gareth Edwards takes the director's chair, and while he's always known how to stage a good spectacle, even his talents can't fully save this dino-soaked popcorn flick.
Let's talk visuals. There's certainly no shortage of giant set pieces and dinosaur mayhem-but when your dinosaurs look like glossy, overcooked cartoon rejects, all the action in the world can't make it feel real. Hollywood still hasn't learned that audiences are burnt out on soulless green-screen overloads, and the actors, forced to react to nothing, stumble through half-baked expressions of terror. You can practically see them wondering where the tennis ball on a stick went.
Character-wise, it's a wash. Most of them are either grating or entirely forgettable, spouting cringey, rapid-fire dialogue that exists solely to shuttle us from one set piece to the next. And while Rebirth does manage to attempt something new and different, it still feels like we're just circling the same prehistoric drain. It's entertaining, sure-but it just isn't that exciting.
That said, it's still a step up from Fallen Kingdom and Dominion, which isn't saying much, but at least it's something. At this point, though, it's time Universal grew a pair and gave us the R-rated, blood-splattered dinosaur horror epic we deserve-because the stakes never feel high when your carnivores are sanitized for mass consumption.
Here's hoping the next one finally evolves. But I'm not holding my breath. It's best to turn your brain off and enjoy this one for what it is.
6/10.
Holy cow! This is more abysmal than i thought would be. None of the actors give good performance. The plot is pathetic. No twists, surprise, addition of a 'family' as if we should care about a bunch of no-name actors with nothing to add to the plot. Hard to believe this is written by David koepp, a master in his own craft. The first flop of this franchise. Universal deserves every piece of criticism it is getting. Horrendous CGI is an added disaster for this slop. I had high expectations after the previous two garbage entries in this franchise but i never felt any excitement in the trailer so naturally the movie is even pathetic i thought it would be.
As someone who's watched every entry in the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World franchises, I have to say, this latest installment is the most disappointing of them all. But should you skip it entirely? Absolutely not. It still works as a decent popcorn flick if you're just in the mood for some dino-action without expecting much else.
When Scarlett Johansson was announced as part of the cast, I had high hopes for a standout performance, especially given her strong track record and the charisma Chris Pratt brought to the previous Jurassic World films. Unfortunately, the film doesn't give her much to work with, and her potential feels underutilized.
What really lets this movie down is its tone. The signature humor that helped balance the tension in earlier films is noticeably absent. Even worse, the horror and suspense hallmarks of any good dinosaur movie are dialed way down, leaving the action feeling flat.
The story itself is a mess. It stumbles at the start, never quite finds its rhythm, and ends without impact. The plot feels disjointed, and the characters are poorly developed, you never feel emotionally invested in what's happening.
And then there's the CGI. For a franchise known for groundbreaking visual effects, this entry is shockingly subpar. The effects are shabby and unconvincing, which really takes you out of the experience.
Bottom line: it's a missed opportunity in almost every way. Still, if you're a fan of the series or just want to see dinosaurs on screen, it's worth a one-time watch, just lower your expectations.
When Scarlett Johansson was announced as part of the cast, I had high hopes for a standout performance, especially given her strong track record and the charisma Chris Pratt brought to the previous Jurassic World films. Unfortunately, the film doesn't give her much to work with, and her potential feels underutilized.
What really lets this movie down is its tone. The signature humor that helped balance the tension in earlier films is noticeably absent. Even worse, the horror and suspense hallmarks of any good dinosaur movie are dialed way down, leaving the action feeling flat.
The story itself is a mess. It stumbles at the start, never quite finds its rhythm, and ends without impact. The plot feels disjointed, and the characters are poorly developed, you never feel emotionally invested in what's happening.
And then there's the CGI. For a franchise known for groundbreaking visual effects, this entry is shockingly subpar. The effects are shabby and unconvincing, which really takes you out of the experience.
Bottom line: it's a missed opportunity in almost every way. Still, if you're a fan of the series or just want to see dinosaurs on screen, it's worth a one-time watch, just lower your expectations.
Namby pamby, ungrateful, wrong place, wrong time and wrong decision-making crybaby family irritated me throughout the movie. Would've been better with ScarJo and her team in my opinion.
Dinos were good, but action scenes, background roars/growls could've been more - let a dino movie BE a dino movie.
Dinos were good, but action scenes, background roars/growls could've been more - let a dino movie BE a dino movie.
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #5 Jurassic World: Rebirth
Discover the most popular movies, series, and stars on IMDb in 2025
What It's Like to Be Part of the Jurassic Park Franchise
What It's Like to Be Part of the Jurassic Park Franchise
Tommy DiDario chats with the stars of Jurassic World Rebirth, including Jonathan Bailey, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, David Iacono, Luna Blaise and Audrina Miranda, at the film's New York premiere.
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJonathan Bailey not only stars as Dr. Henry Loomis, but also contributes to the film score. He plays clarinet in several orchestral tracks and performs the solo heard during the scene when his character touches a dinosaur for the first time.
- GaffesIn the service station on the island, the family escape down a drain after seeing the water flow down the grid, but the tunnels themselves are completely dry and free of water. For a sewer, it is awfully big for rainwater and awfully clean for a sewer- especially in a tropical climate.
- Citations
Dr. Henry Loomis: Survival is a long shot.
- Générique farfeluAt the very end of the credits, nature sounds from the island are heard.
- Bandes originalesMovin' On Up
Written by Bobby Gillespie, Andrew Innes, Robert Young
Performed by Primal Scream
Courtesy of Reprise Records/Creation Records
Licensed by Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing/Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Jurassic World: Rebirth
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 180 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 339 640 400 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 92 016 065 $ US
- 6 juill. 2025
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 869 146 189 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 13m(133 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






