Un biologiste s'inscrit pour une expédition secrète et dangereuse dans une zone mystérieuse où les lois naturelles ne s'appliquent pas.Un biologiste s'inscrit pour une expédition secrète et dangereuse dans une zone mystérieuse où les lois naturelles ne s'appliquent pas.Un biologiste s'inscrit pour une expédition secrète et dangereuse dans une zone mystérieuse où les lois naturelles ne s'appliquent pas.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 17 victoires et 63 nominations au total
- Peyton
- (uncredited)
- Scientist
- (uncredited)
- Special Forces
- (uncredited)
- Special Ops Soldier
- (uncredited)
- Scientist
- (uncredited)
Avis en vedette
There are just too many times that things occur that have no sense or logic. I'm not talking about the "alien" aspect, which is supposed to be somewhat mysterious and incomprehensible, but about the way that the humans in the story act or react to what's going on. The way that the government is handling the phenomenon seems strangely hands-off for what should be the most important event in the history of humanity, and the individuals involved make lots of odd decisions just to drive the story forward.
On top of that, there is a framing device where a survivor is being interrogated about the events of what is shown throughout the movie, and it not only doesn't provide any additional illumination to bother with the clunkiness, it tends to deflate a lot of the tension by giving away certain plot points before you see them on screen. The ending is more just vague for the sense of being mysterious rather than making you really ask questions afterward. I suspect that if you asked the Director how the ending related to the rest of the movie, he would't be able to give more of an answer than he wanted things to be left open-ended.
Finally, the characters are all fairly morose and sedated. There's a (weak) explanation in the movie for this, but the overall low energy makes you not care too much about any of the characters.
But I still really liked it. It's creepy and atmospheric and more concerned with the psychology of people on a suicide mission than on the nuts and bolts of scientific investigation. It's often intense , usually beautiful, well acted, and had some really weird and mesmerizing moments.
I won't argue that you should forgive it for its plot holes, or that it has any deep meaning, or anything like that. In fact, it's probably easier to make a convincing argument against the movie than for it. I'm just saying, I really liked it.
ADDENDUM: I looked at the user reviews recently (2024) and the top reviews are no longer lists of plot holes. The people who enjoyed the movie, like me, have since my review pushed the naysayers down. Which I fully support.
In slamming the movie, I saw one reviewer compare it to Sunshine, which he also hated. That review was what actually flipped the switch and got me to watch it, but I'd say that is a good test. If you don't like movies like Sunshine (also written by Alex Garland), you probably won't like this.
20 Top-Rated Original Series on Paramount+
20 Top-Rated Original Series on Paramount+
Blocage sonore
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDue to a poorly received test screening, David Ellison, a financier at Paramount, became concerned that the film was "too intellectual" and "too complicated," and demanded changes to make it appeal to a wider audience, including making Natalie Portman's character more sympathetic and changing the ending. Producer Scott Rudin sided with Garland in his desire to not alter the film, defending it and refusing to take notes. Rudin had final cut.
- GaffesSentries would never light the inside of a watchtower, which would illuminate themselves and make it impossible for them to see anything outside.
- Citations
Lena: Why did my husband volunteer for a suicide mission?
Dr Ventress: Is that what you think we're doing? Committing suicide?
Lena: You must have profiled him. You must have assessed him. He must have said something.
Dr Ventress: So you're asking me as a psychologist?
Lena: Yeah.
Dr Ventress: Then, as a psychologist, I think you're confusing suicide with self-destruction. Almost none of us commit suicide, and almost all of us self-destruct. In some way, in some part of our lives. We drink, or we smoke, we destabilize the good job... and a happy marriage. But these aren't decisions, they're... they're impulses. In fact, you're probably better equipped to explain this than I am.
Lena: What does that mean?
Dr Ventress: You're a biologist. Isn't the self-destruction coded into us? Programmed into each cell?
- ConnexionsFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Annihilation (2018)
- Bandes originalesHelplessly Hoping
Performed by Crosby Stills & Nash (as Crosby Stills and Nash)
Written by Stephen Stills
Licensed courtesy of Warner Music UK
Published by Gold Hill Music Inc (BMI)
Meilleurs choix
Everything New on Paramount+ in December
Everything New on Paramount+ in December
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Aniquilación
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 40 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 32 732 301 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 11 071 584 $ US
- 25 févr. 2018
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 43 070 915 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 55m(115 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1





