Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA reporter, cameraman, and some petty thieves are stranded in a boat out on the ocean. The only thing that stands between them and their lives is a 50-foot prehistoric megalodon shark. They ... Tout lireA reporter, cameraman, and some petty thieves are stranded in a boat out on the ocean. The only thing that stands between them and their lives is a 50-foot prehistoric megalodon shark. They must all pull together to survive.A reporter, cameraman, and some petty thieves are stranded in a boat out on the ocean. The only thing that stands between them and their lives is a 50-foot prehistoric megalodon shark. They must all pull together to survive.
Avis en vedette
Jurassic Shark 3 is a movie that attempts to be a comedy horror, but fails on both counts. The movie is a disaster of bad effects, terrible acting, and nonsensical directing. The story is absurd and implausible, involving sharks that escape from a secret lab and attack people in the sea and a lake. The movie is not funny at all, but rather annoying and boring, especially the reporter at the beginning who is standing by a lake and talking about sharks in the ocean eating people. The movie is a complete waste of time and money, and I do not recommend it to anyone who likes good movies. Jurrasic Shark 3 is one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
We put this on trying to find a easy watch for the weekend. I have never seen such a pile of crap in my life. The CGI is like something from the 80s. We're only 5 minutes in and praying for the actors careers. The SFX people are going to hell.
Something actually worse than the Kardashians.
The fire on the boat scene is brilliant, who would release this crap with any self respect?
10 minutes in and praying for the actors who will never act again & struggle to work in burger king. Describing a cheap PC usb camera as a "small underwater camera" is a bit naff.
On a positive note... the film ends.
Anybody involved in this film.... please stop.
Something actually worse than the Kardashians.
The fire on the boat scene is brilliant, who would release this crap with any self respect?
10 minutes in and praying for the actors who will never act again & struggle to work in burger king. Describing a cheap PC usb camera as a "small underwater camera" is a bit naff.
On a positive note... the film ends.
Anybody involved in this film.... please stop.
Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge is a 2023 film directed by Mark Polonia. A Bunch of people are stranded out in the ocean and a giant shark prevents them from fully reaching their freedom.
I swear this paining is the main through line in all the films but for the first time we find out what the painting is and that at least is good. The film is mostly held together well but having a full story wide recollection towards the end was a big much and clearly done to pad the run time. Then of course at the end they literally jump the shark and go in an entirely new direction falling apart at the end.
I love the fact that Titus Himmelberger survived into this film. He is great every time I see him on film. Mark Polonia is also quite fun to watch in his role as the camera man. Jada Sanchez is also pretty good at playing the bimboish model Bree was quite surprised at the level of performance. Kyle Rappaport joins the cast as one od the two criminals for the movie and rounds out the three with is antics.
The Fin returns yet again! They stepped up their CG game a little with the shark looking a little better and only utilizing some of the previous CG work from the last film. There was a scene in particular about the shark swimming past a boat that I thought looked pretty good overall. Though not perfect I would say that the production here was better than the other two Jurassic Shark Movies. The shark puppet utilized at the end was entertaining and I think I would rather have had the movie revolve around it instead of come in last minute at the end.
I really like the main theme better in this one than I did Jurassic park 2. It isn't the best theme in the world but does fit the source material well enough.
Thought he film started out as a better one that 1 or 2 the disjointed narrative, padding and strange switch up with he plot drag the film down a pace. I do think if you are a huge Polonia fan you may enjoy it as the gang is all here and doing an ok job and if you liked the first two films in the series you should find the same stuff you enjoy here. For anyone else looking for a good shark film your time may be suited elsewhere.
I swear this paining is the main through line in all the films but for the first time we find out what the painting is and that at least is good. The film is mostly held together well but having a full story wide recollection towards the end was a big much and clearly done to pad the run time. Then of course at the end they literally jump the shark and go in an entirely new direction falling apart at the end.
I love the fact that Titus Himmelberger survived into this film. He is great every time I see him on film. Mark Polonia is also quite fun to watch in his role as the camera man. Jada Sanchez is also pretty good at playing the bimboish model Bree was quite surprised at the level of performance. Kyle Rappaport joins the cast as one od the two criminals for the movie and rounds out the three with is antics.
The Fin returns yet again! They stepped up their CG game a little with the shark looking a little better and only utilizing some of the previous CG work from the last film. There was a scene in particular about the shark swimming past a boat that I thought looked pretty good overall. Though not perfect I would say that the production here was better than the other two Jurassic Shark Movies. The shark puppet utilized at the end was entertaining and I think I would rather have had the movie revolve around it instead of come in last minute at the end.
I really like the main theme better in this one than I did Jurassic park 2. It isn't the best theme in the world but does fit the source material well enough.
Thought he film started out as a better one that 1 or 2 the disjointed narrative, padding and strange switch up with he plot drag the film down a pace. I do think if you are a huge Polonia fan you may enjoy it as the gang is all here and doing an ok job and if you liked the first two films in the series you should find the same stuff you enjoy here. For anyone else looking for a good shark film your time may be suited elsewhere.
Jurassic shark 3 jumps the shark with confirmation of the greatest shared universe of all time. Forget the MCU, mark polonias universe is the most entertaining movie universe ever. Jokes aside this movies inclusion of the shark from sharkenstein is a terrible choice. Do not add other terrible movies into the already awful Jurassic shark franchise. And it's not just sharkenstein they are adding into their universe, it's land shark too. Remember how in land shark the shark could go on land? That's probably why that movie sucks. Anyway in this abomination sharkenstein can walk on land, it did that in sharkenstein but it needed a lightning boost. That's probably why that movie sucks too. Also the mad scientist from sharkenstein died in that movie. I guess he's just alive now because we need exposition for a shark that we don't need in this movie but is only here to add runtime. So as you can see this movie sucks and I've only talked about one scene. There are a lot more issues but most of them are the usual mark polonia issues like a terrible plot, cheesy dialogue, bad acting, ugly CGI, cheap puppets, awful music and those same actors from Jurassic shark 2. Despite all these issues it is better than Jurassic sharks 1&2 and other Mark Polonia movies.
Well, I have to be honest and start out by saying that I harbored absolutely no expectations to this 2023 movie titled "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", as I have indeed watched the previous two movies. Yet, I still opted to watch it, on account of it being a shark movie that I hadn't already seen.
Now, the storyline in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", as written by Bando Glutz, was actually pretty straightforward and not all-together too shabby. Sure, it was generic, predictable and somewhat dumb, but it could have been worse.
But it is hard to point out all the flaws that there is to "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", because there were so many flaws in the movie. So many, in fact, that it keeps the movie afloat, because everything is so over-the-top hilariously bad to witness.
The acting performances in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were wooden and rigid at best. I have to say that the performance put on by Jamie Morgan, in the role of Boyd, was some of the worst acting performances I have witnessed in a long, long time. But it seemed to be a consensus in the movie that the acting performances had to be amateurish, wooden and forced.
The special effects in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were bad, so very, very bad. The CGI animated shark was just awful to look at. And the practical effect shark was nothing more than a hand-puppet shark and blatantly so, as it looked nowhere near a realistic shark in any way.
The best thing about "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" was actually the movie's cover/poster.
It should be noted that "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" also does a crossover, as it brings in the shark from the 2016 "Sharkenstein" movie into the storyline.
If you enjoy low budget B movies with questionable effects and amateurish acting performances, then by all means "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" from director Mark Polonia might be your type of movie.
My rating of "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" lands on a one out of ten stars.
Now, the storyline in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", as written by Bando Glutz, was actually pretty straightforward and not all-together too shabby. Sure, it was generic, predictable and somewhat dumb, but it could have been worse.
But it is hard to point out all the flaws that there is to "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge", because there were so many flaws in the movie. So many, in fact, that it keeps the movie afloat, because everything is so over-the-top hilariously bad to witness.
The acting performances in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were wooden and rigid at best. I have to say that the performance put on by Jamie Morgan, in the role of Boyd, was some of the worst acting performances I have witnessed in a long, long time. But it seemed to be a consensus in the movie that the acting performances had to be amateurish, wooden and forced.
The special effects in "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" were bad, so very, very bad. The CGI animated shark was just awful to look at. And the practical effect shark was nothing more than a hand-puppet shark and blatantly so, as it looked nowhere near a realistic shark in any way.
The best thing about "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" was actually the movie's cover/poster.
It should be noted that "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" also does a crossover, as it brings in the shark from the 2016 "Sharkenstein" movie into the storyline.
If you enjoy low budget B movies with questionable effects and amateurish acting performances, then by all means "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" from director Mark Polonia might be your type of movie.
My rating of "Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge" lands on a one out of ten stars.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsFollows Jurassic Shark 2: Aquapocalypse (2021)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 14 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 16 : 9
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Jurassic Shark 3: Seavenge (2023) officially released in India in English?
Répondre