[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Rewind

  • Téléfilm
  • 2013
  • TV-14
  • 1h 16m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,9/10
1,7 k
MA NOTE
Rewind (2013)
MesureScience-fictionThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA team of military field operatives and civilian scientists must use untested technology to travel back in time to alter past events in order to change the future and avoid a devastating ter... Tout lireA team of military field operatives and civilian scientists must use untested technology to travel back in time to alter past events in order to change the future and avoid a devastating terrorist attack.A team of military field operatives and civilian scientists must use untested technology to travel back in time to alter past events in order to change the future and avoid a devastating terrorist attack.

  • Director
    • Jack Bender
  • Writer
    • Justin Marks
  • Stars
    • Shane McRae
    • Jennifer Ferrin
    • Robbie Jones
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    5,9/10
    1,7 k
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • Jack Bender
    • Writer
      • Justin Marks
    • Stars
      • Shane McRae
      • Jennifer Ferrin
      • Robbie Jones
    • 23Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 2Commentaires de critiques
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Photos64

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 60
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux25

    Modifier
    Shane McRae
    Shane McRae
    • Shaun Knox
    Jennifer Ferrin
    Jennifer Ferrin
    • Dr. Lyndsay Bryce
    Robbie Jones
    Robbie Jones
    • Danny
    Keon Alexander
    Keon Alexander
    • Charlie
    Keisha Castle-Hughes
    Keisha Castle-Hughes
    • Priya
    Jeff Fahey
    Jeff Fahey
    • Ellis
    Kenneth Welsh
    Kenneth Welsh
    • President
    Matthew Bennett
    Matthew Bennett
    • John Malcolm
    Paulino Nunes
    Paulino Nunes
    • General Randall Webb
    Melanie Scrofano
    Melanie Scrofano
    • Jessica Knox
    David Cronenberg
    David Cronenberg
    • Rourke
    James Downing
    • Chief of Staff
    Jim Codrington
    Jim Codrington
    • CIA Director
    Joanne Reece
    Joanne Reece
    • RSA Adviser
    Rosemary Dunsmore
    Rosemary Dunsmore
    • Secretary of State
    Robert B. Kennedy
    Robert B. Kennedy
    • Chief
    Jamaal Grant
    Jamaal Grant
    • Agent #1
    Chris Violette
    Chris Violette
    • Agent #2
    • Director
      • Jack Bender
    • Writer
      • Justin Marks
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs23

    5,91.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    6mballardc32

    Unlimited Potential, But Contained Amateur Dramatisation

    I loved watching this and although I knew it was a failed pilot, i was still quickly overwhelmed by the huge sense of adventure in the story. Although this may have been made in a seemingly amateur style, I still believe that this show should have continued. The potential story's are endless. This left many questions unanswered as episodes should do as it makes you crave the next episode, thus there needs to be more. Call me inexperienced if you must but, I have not come across the whole idea of a ripple machine before. I always hated the whole uneasiness of movies with concepts of time travel where people go back in time for a certain reason and end up doing whatever they possible can to achieve the desired outcome. Then they return to their original time and only their desired result has occurred. I'm sure there should have been millions of ripples after the destruction they had caused. But this show tackles that problem implementing a true-sight backdrop for all ripples in time allowing the time travelers to know precisely the consequences of their actions.

    Overall this film was intriguing and adventurously fun.
    6fkm1964

    Great prospect for a new series

    I had set my DVR to record the series not knowing it was a one shot deal. If they knew this up front, it was one lousy and confusing ending. A madman had killed over nine million people with a nuclear bomb in New York and using an untested top secret project three people go back some 54 years to set the man on the right path thus saving New York. They make it back with seconds to spare and everything seems okay until a military officer overseeing the project steps thru the time stream to an unknown time or location. THE END. COME ON. Where did he go and what did he do? The ending sucked. This show had a new concept of time travel at most, a little of Continuum in it but it has promise. I guess fictitious wrestling, game shows and chasing ghosts are more cost effective. Welcome to brain dead, cheap, mindless and modern TV. Our Syfy (Sci-Fi) channel has lost it's way with less than half a dozen true science fiction shows on now and not a single new space series on. Please give us something worth watching.
    8drbits

    Good Show. Good Science. Good Action

    This is a pilot for a series, not a TV Movie (as categorized by IMDb).

    Although the plot drags in places, about half of the show is an "edge of your seat" experience.

    This pilot contains the most ambitious time travel explanations I have seen in movies or TV. The science works (with General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics of massive particles). The explanation of how changes to the past ripple to the future and the simulations are realistic.

    Whoever researched the science behind the show did an excellent job, but the science concepts are above the heads of most viewers and may cause dissatisfaction for some reviewers. Many of us are used to lots of jargon, but that is deliberately skipped here.

    I think the general public would accept this show as an action-drama.
    7thejman1916

    Not bad at all.

    I do hope that this will be a pilot for a full series as I thought it was pretty good and there has certainly been a lot worse (not naming names). Sure time travel is nothing new, but we live in an age where it's increasingly difficult to come up with something new as pretty much everything has been done before in some form or other. There were hints of Continuum and Quantum Leap thrown in there and this initial pilot did show promise and potential for more. The acting was O.K. it was nice to see Jeff Fahey,(I was a little upset when his character was killed off after the first few minutes of Under the Dome) and the storyline/plot/writing/script was O.K. too. Overall this was a decent production that deserves a chance for more to follow. 7/10.
    7weasl-729-310682

    Good continuation of "Quantum Leap"

    This could have been a great series and I don't understand why they didn't pursue it. With "Quantum Leap" what kept the viewer so engaged was a different venue every time with familiar characters. I really liked this pilot, and I think it's abandonment was a waste of a really very good idea.

    This one and QL also brought an education to viewers about culture in different times. So interesting, and such a waste to scrap this one.

    The concept will be brought back at some point, and it will be a popular money-maker.

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    Englemageren
    5,3
    Englemageren
    Rewind
    6,6
    Rewind
    Rewind
    7,9
    Rewind
    Rewind
    7,5
    Rewind
    Leonard Cohen: Tower of Song
    8,3
    Leonard Cohen: Tower of Song
    Ape Sodom
    6,5
    Ape Sodom
    Le couteau par la lame
    6,1
    Le couteau par la lame
    Falling Water
    6,4
    Falling Water
    We Were Wolves
    7,4
    We Were Wolves
    Le jour où la Terre s'arrêta
    5,5
    Le jour où la Terre s'arrêta
    Consumed
    5,5
    Consumed
    Birdland
    3,3
    Birdland

    Intérêts connexes

    Bruce Willis in Piège de cristal (1988)
    Mesure
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in La guerre des étoiles V: L'empire contre-attaque (1980)
    Science-fiction
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      This was a pilot for a series that was not picked up by the network. It was the second attempt in the 2000's to revamp the successful 1960's Irwin Allen series The Time Tunnel. Allen was the blockbuster TV producer of Lost In Space, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea and Land of the Giants. Like the other Time Tunnel reboot, both suffered from being too similar to the already successful and recent Stargate.
    • Gaffes
      If a possible nuclear explosion is in "a few minutes," it seems unrealistic that Dr. Bryce would flee the city, knowing full well that she could not save herself.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ1

    • Why did this TV show/movie end so suddenly and with such a terrible ending?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 26 août 2013 (United States)
    • Pays d’origine
      • United States
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Nhìn lại
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Millbrook, Ontario, Canada(pilot Episode)
    • sociétés de production
      • BermanBraun
      • Universal Cable Productions
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 16m(76 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 16 : 9

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.