[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

2067

  • 2020
  • 14+
  • 1h 54m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,9/10
13 k
MA NOTE
Ryan Kwanten and Kodi Smit-McPhee in 2067 (2020)
By the year 2067, Earth has been ravaged by climate change and humanity is forced to live on artificial oxygen. An illness caused by the synthetic O2 is killing the worlds' population and the only hope for a cure comes in the form of a message from the future: "Send Ethan Whyte". Ethan, an underground tunnel worker, is suddenly thrust into a terrifying new world full of unknown danger as he must fight to save the human race.
Liretrailer1:53
2 vidéos
29 photos
MystèreScience-fictionScience-fiction dystopiqueVoyage dans le temps

Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.

  • Director
    • Seth Larney
  • Writers
    • Seth Larney
    • Gareth Davies
    • Galvin Scott Davis
  • Stars
    • Aaron Glenane
    • Kodi Smit-McPhee
    • Ryan Kwanten
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    4,9/10
    13 k
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • Seth Larney
    • Writers
      • Seth Larney
      • Gareth Davies
      • Galvin Scott Davis
    • Stars
      • Aaron Glenane
      • Kodi Smit-McPhee
      • Ryan Kwanten
    • 410Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 55Commentaires de critiques
    • 39Métascore
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
    • Prix
      • 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos2

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:53
    Official Trailer
    2067
    Trailer 1:53
    2067
    2067
    Trailer 1:53
    2067

    Photos28

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 23
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux27

    Modifier
    Aaron Glenane
    Aaron Glenane
    • Richard Whyte
    Kodi Smit-McPhee
    Kodi Smit-McPhee
    • Ethan Whyte
    Ryan Kwanten
    Ryan Kwanten
    • Jude Mathers
    Finn Little
    Finn Little
    • Young Ethan Whyte
    Deborah Mailman
    Deborah Mailman
    • Regina Jackson
    Sana'a Shaik
    Sana'a Shaik
    • Xanthe Whyte
    Matt Testro
    Matt Testro
    • Young Jude Mathers
    Damian Walshe-Howling
    Damian Walshe-Howling
    • Billy Mitchell
    Leeanna Walsman
    Leeanna Walsman
    • Selene Whyte
    Aidan Gillett
    Aidan Gillett
    • Protestor
    Craig McArdle
    • Hawker
    Andy McPhee
    Andy McPhee
    • Desperate Worker
    Chris Mitchell
    • Security Guard 2047
    Checc Musolino
    Checc Musolino
    • Chronicorp Security Guard
    Rachael Wegener
    • Chronicorp Security Guard
    Janet Tan
    • Smiling Woman (Hologram)
    Meme Thorne
    • Newsreader
    • (as Mémé Thorne)
    Rory Walker
    • News Broadcaster
    • Director
      • Seth Larney
    • Writers
      • Seth Larney
      • Gareth Davies
      • Galvin Scott Davis
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs410

    4,912.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    4madsyy

    Tears Tears Tears

    Never ever came across a sci-fi with people shedding tears almost in every other scene. A bit over the top 'emotional weight' quotient I'd say! You'll know when you see it.

    A bit interesting in parts. Visuals of apocalyptic+future earth are definitely super good. A one time watch on a lazy afternoon
    6Sickpuppy365

    Plant a tree people

    For those complaining about all the "emotions"... I'm quite positive that faced with the prospect of being catapulted some 400 years into an uncertain future world, via a big sizzling Dyson vacuum cleaner controlled by a super computer that still uses a blinking cursor and a keyboard, leaving behind your dying significant other, with no return ticket and the fate of all humanity resting on your very narrow shoulders... one would shed significantly more bodily fluids than a few blubbering tears. I mean honestly people... 2067 is currently rated somewhere between Super Mario Brothers and Tank Girl... Obviously "fair" is not a grown-up word.

    So here is an honest review... I watched this movie with very low expectations having seen its score and read a few reviews. I was pleasantly surprised that it held my attention to the very end. I was impressed with the visuals and special effects. The "science" and storyline do require a modicum of suspension of disbelief, but remember why most of us watch movies... To escape from our miserable realities for a couple hours... So we can forgive ourselves for putting our Underoos on and just enjoying a movie every once-in-a-while without screaming for a full refund on the last 2 hours of our banal lives. As relatively unknowns, I feel the cast earned their paychecks, as I'm certain none of them raked it in, and I found myself actually caring about these characters whom I'd only met mere minutes earlier. Lastly I was happy I was eventually able to wrap my head around the plot without suffering an Inception-like brain freeze.

    Have faith peeps, you can make it through this movie... And if you're not too careful... You just might enjoy it.
    6JudgeSteve

    Suspension of disbelief is necessary

    I am a fan of what the Mothers of Invention called Cheapness. Science fiction movies, primarily from the 1950s and 1960s, in which you could tell Godzilla was a man in a rubber suit, or see the strings suspending the rocket against the black backdrop of outer space. This film, made in Australia, is a modern version of Cheapness. The time machine at the center of the story appears to be a large piece of concrete piping decorated with blinking lights and plastic tubing. There is absolutely no CGI and only one or two soundstage sets. Paintings are used to depict future cityscapes. The story is disconnected, the script straight-up-corny, and the antagonists predictable. But, if you relax and enjoy, without looking for the lack of continuity, it's entirely enjoyable escapism. I really don't think this movie takes itself too seriously and you shouldn't either.
    6Breumaster

    Basically Good, but Awfully Bad Logic Fails and Plot Holes

    I see that movie as a failed chance. The basic story is solid good from the beginning on, the acting is not bad. I like the effects and the ending, but in-between it has serious logical errors, get's too cheesy at a few moments and the music is sometimes over the top. The message is ok, but at some points it seems to be constructed with a common set of story elements, which are used in other movies. That happens especially when it comes close to the end. For me as a movie dude it feels like I saw those in another version earlier with other actors. I think if they would have spent a little more money for a better script, it could have been more delightful. The idea of this movie is good.

    I would recommend it for people who like environmental scifi movies and who didn't see many of them.
    5xaocam-77480

    Sunday afternoon viewing

    Not a bad flick, but not noteworthy either. The effects were decent and gave it a proper sci-fi setting. The Dialogue was wanting, and to be honest, too much crying going on, far too much! It is one of those sci-fis were you have to ignore the science, just accept the plot holes the inaccuracies make. The acting was pretty stiff. It tried hard and probably the effects were the best feature of the film - which is a bit worrying. All in all though, still gets a 5 for a Sunday afternoon which is a pass and not a complete fail

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Although the movie takes place in Australia and everyone speaks with an Australian accent, Jude, played by Australian actor Ryan Kwanten, is the only character in the film that inexplicably speaks with an American accent.
    • Gaffes
      They are sending someone 400 years forward in time. With no clue or anything in what kind of (unfriendly?) environment he will arrive. And they don't give him any food or drink for the first days in the future? So he has to eat some berries which are unknown and turned out to be very poisonous.
    • Citations

      Regina: What if I told you that you could save all of us?

    • Générique farfelu
      No butterflies were harmed during the making of this film.
    • Connexions
      References La machine à explorer le temps (2002)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ15

    • How long is 2067?Propulsé par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 2 octobre 2020 (Canada)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Australia
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Chronical: 2067
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Adelaide Studios, 226 Fullarton Road, Glenside, South Australia, Australie
    • sociétés de production
      • Screen Australia
      • XYZ Films
      • Forte Corp Pictures
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 54m(114 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.