Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn account of serial killer Richard Ramírez and his rampage in California during the mid-1980s.An account of serial killer Richard Ramírez and his rampage in California during the mid-1980s.An account of serial killer Richard Ramírez and his rampage in California during the mid-1980s.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Samantha Neyland Trumbo
- Emily
- (as Samantha Neyland)
Julian A. Garcia
- Trainer
- (as Julian Alexander)
Avis en vedette
Lou Diamond Phillips stellar performance as the serial killer Richard Ramirez was simply wasted playing opposite actress Bellamy Young who plays a fictional lawyer named Kit (Katherine) whose own life was supposedly haunted by the real Richard Ramirez's 1980's killing spree as the infamous Night Stalker as she lived in the California area.
Yes, the majority of incidents described as happening in Richard Ramirez's teens and the film's killings outlined in this fictional biopic actually occurred and are attributed to Richard Ramirez's murderous spree. However, this film focuses on Ramirez's time in captivity and his interactions with the female lawyer Kit, who meets with Ramirez over four (4) consecutive days in an attempt to record a confession for a double murder that another man will be executed for committing if Ramirez will not admit to being the actual perpetrator.
The fictional drama occurs as Kit is reliving her own teen years while the Night Stalker is all over the news during his late evening robbery, rape and vicious murder spree. Kit has her own demons to live with and the interview scenes between Kit and the shackled Richard Ramirez (Lou Diamond Phillips) are worth watching the film if for nothing else.
I hope the now 56 year old Lou Diamond Phillips is provided an opportunity to star in a few dramatic major motion pictures based on this outstanding role as the Night Stalker, because he has certainly paid his dues carrying more than one film on his own broad shoulders and raising the bar on his fellow actors/actresses to follow his lead. "Lead" being the key word.
I rate The Night Stalker a high 7 out of 10 on Lou Diamond Phillip's outstanding performance.
Yes, the majority of incidents described as happening in Richard Ramirez's teens and the film's killings outlined in this fictional biopic actually occurred and are attributed to Richard Ramirez's murderous spree. However, this film focuses on Ramirez's time in captivity and his interactions with the female lawyer Kit, who meets with Ramirez over four (4) consecutive days in an attempt to record a confession for a double murder that another man will be executed for committing if Ramirez will not admit to being the actual perpetrator.
The fictional drama occurs as Kit is reliving her own teen years while the Night Stalker is all over the news during his late evening robbery, rape and vicious murder spree. Kit has her own demons to live with and the interview scenes between Kit and the shackled Richard Ramirez (Lou Diamond Phillips) are worth watching the film if for nothing else.
I hope the now 56 year old Lou Diamond Phillips is provided an opportunity to star in a few dramatic major motion pictures based on this outstanding role as the Night Stalker, because he has certainly paid his dues carrying more than one film on his own broad shoulders and raising the bar on his fellow actors/actresses to follow his lead. "Lead" being the key word.
I rate The Night Stalker a high 7 out of 10 on Lou Diamond Phillip's outstanding performance.
When a killer himself confesses his crimes and he is saying that i did that for fun what do you expect from him?
Can you really commit a murder for fun?
Can you?
Richard ramirez is one of the dastardly human beings I have ever witnessed in life that you can ever encounter in life.
That is really a incarnation of evil and can cause you to tremble with fear and angst.
And he has no regard for right or wrong and how one suffers because of him.
The story conveyed in this movie is deeply intense and how a normal person can turn into a ruthless killer after enduring trauma during childhood that really damages you from the core and unleashes a force of vengeance!!
Can you really commit a murder for fun?
Can you?
Richard ramirez is one of the dastardly human beings I have ever witnessed in life that you can ever encounter in life.
That is really a incarnation of evil and can cause you to tremble with fear and angst.
And he has no regard for right or wrong and how one suffers because of him.
The story conveyed in this movie is deeply intense and how a normal person can turn into a ruthless killer after enduring trauma during childhood that really damages you from the core and unleashes a force of vengeance!!
Lou Diamond Phillips is Chilling and Brilliant in this account of the serial killer, Richard Ramirez aka The Night Stalker. Bellamy Young was miscast in her role opposite him. She is a very good actress but paled in comparison to her costar. She just seemed flat in their interactions which was a shame. If she had even tried to muster some intensity or strength, it would have made all the difference. Her character who was supposed to be a smart but slightly damaged lawyer, just came off as weak. The supporting cast was brilliant especially the young boy and man who played younger Richard. They not only looked exactly right but were fabulous in the part. The only thing that was troubling was the script which I felt was too sympathetic towards Ramirez.
I'm going to agree with most of the written reviews here, and go against the overall score this movie got. I am usually very critical of TV movies, but this one was as good, or better, than most feature films.
I thought the acting was first-rate, and the direction was excellent, too. The movie had an aura of danger and suspense about it that most thrillers do not. Of course, that was aided by the foreboding music that lay beneath many of the scenes. But that's OK.
It also helped that the hero, if you want to call her that, was nearly as damaged as the bad guy. She had her own demons, and acted out in ways harmful to herself as a result of them. You don't often see that in these movies; usually the good guy is, well, good, and not nearly defined in depth as the one here was.
This was a good psychological thriller, with both main characters exhibiting deep flaws that are examined nicely.
I know the basic story of the Night Stalker was accurate; I don't know if the plot of the movie was, though. But still, it is very good.
My only complaint is regarding the credits, and has nothing to do with the movie itself. Here on IMDB Annalisa Cochrane as "Mary" gets top billing. That makes no sense; she is only in the movie for one brief scene. She isn't even close to being a main character. So why put her at the top of the cast credit?
I thought the acting was first-rate, and the direction was excellent, too. The movie had an aura of danger and suspense about it that most thrillers do not. Of course, that was aided by the foreboding music that lay beneath many of the scenes. But that's OK.
It also helped that the hero, if you want to call her that, was nearly as damaged as the bad guy. She had her own demons, and acted out in ways harmful to herself as a result of them. You don't often see that in these movies; usually the good guy is, well, good, and not nearly defined in depth as the one here was.
This was a good psychological thriller, with both main characters exhibiting deep flaws that are examined nicely.
I know the basic story of the Night Stalker was accurate; I don't know if the plot of the movie was, though. But still, it is very good.
My only complaint is regarding the credits, and has nothing to do with the movie itself. Here on IMDB Annalisa Cochrane as "Mary" gets top billing. That makes no sense; she is only in the movie for one brief scene. She isn't even close to being a main character. So why put her at the top of the cast credit?
Writing & Directing sounds fun, but you control too much. You are blind to your own weaknesses without checks. This is why it takes a team to make a film.
Story is definitely dark, & the tone is appropriately dark.
However, much of the film is so dark it's not watchable. Pivotal scenes. I changed the settings on my very good TV to brighten up as much as possible. Didn't help enough. No idea what was happening in a few scenes.
Well told true story with a couple twists & turns. But there's too much dialogue in light scenes, & too much action in dark scenes.
One ominous note underscores nonstop from start to end.
Lou Diamond Phillips delivers as usual. Good performances, just a bit overshadowed by bad production decisions.
Story is definitely dark, & the tone is appropriately dark.
However, much of the film is so dark it's not watchable. Pivotal scenes. I changed the settings on my very good TV to brighten up as much as possible. Didn't help enough. No idea what was happening in a few scenes.
Well told true story with a couple twists & turns. But there's too much dialogue in light scenes, & too much action in dark scenes.
One ominous note underscores nonstop from start to end.
Lou Diamond Phillips delivers as usual. Good performances, just a bit overshadowed by bad production decisions.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe drawings that are seen hanging in Richard Ramirez's cell in the film were actual drawings done by Ramirez, that were originally sent to his personal acquaintance: Dillon Kroe.
- Citations
Richard Ramirez: Killing is killing whether done for duty, profit, or fun.
- ConnexionsVersion of Tueur en série (1989)
- Bandes originalesBe Forewarned
Performed by Pentagram
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant