Le brillant avenir d'un directeur adjoint du MI6 bascule soudain lorsqu'une rencontre avec une espionne russe l'oblige à remettre sa vie entière en question.Le brillant avenir d'un directeur adjoint du MI6 bascule soudain lorsqu'une rencontre avec une espionne russe l'oblige à remettre sa vie entière en question.Le brillant avenir d'un directeur adjoint du MI6 bascule soudain lorsqu'une rencontre avec une espionne russe l'oblige à remettre sa vie entière en question.
- Création originale
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis en vedette
I was looking forward to watching Charlie Cox in a spy thriller. Seemed promising with actors like Ciaran Hinds ad Olga Kurylenko attached to it. After watching the first episodes, it was underwhelming, to say the least.
From the get-go, the premise is not believable. Cox plays the deputy to the MI6 Control, who is thrust into heading up MI6 in a huff. Through horribly rapid pacing, everything is just a frantic, chaotic mess of storytelling, with ridiculously silly tropes that will make you eyes roll.
And it just continues from there-a lot of shouting, hysteria, and tense soundtrack to ramp up the sense of urgency and intrigue-pretty cheap theatrics. Maybe it'll settle down, but I won't make it that far.
From the get-go, the premise is not believable. Cox plays the deputy to the MI6 Control, who is thrust into heading up MI6 in a huff. Through horribly rapid pacing, everything is just a frantic, chaotic mess of storytelling, with ridiculously silly tropes that will make you eyes roll.
And it just continues from there-a lot of shouting, hysteria, and tense soundtrack to ramp up the sense of urgency and intrigue-pretty cheap theatrics. Maybe it'll settle down, but I won't make it that far.
5pfne
From a magic pen that can hear caller's on a phone, to inept highly trained professionals that can't keep an eye on a boats hatch, there's all manner of idiocy in this show.
I will say, Charlie Cox plays a pretty good part. He's not an outstandingly brilliant actor by any stretch of the imagination, but he's well cast and does his best with the script etc.
Unfortunately, the rest.of the show is subpar spy nonsense with Deus Ex Machinas for every corner they wrote themselves into. It makes for a show you can only really enjoy if you turn logic and rational thought off for a while.
If it had run any longer than it does, I'd have not watched beyond episode 2 because spending 10 or 11 hours with this show would be way way too much.
I will say, Charlie Cox plays a pretty good part. He's not an outstandingly brilliant actor by any stretch of the imagination, but he's well cast and does his best with the script etc.
Unfortunately, the rest.of the show is subpar spy nonsense with Deus Ex Machinas for every corner they wrote themselves into. It makes for a show you can only really enjoy if you turn logic and rational thought off for a while.
If it had run any longer than it does, I'd have not watched beyond episode 2 because spending 10 or 11 hours with this show would be way way too much.
This was one of the dumbest 'spy' attempts, and MI6, c'mon!
Even though I lower the bar for a Netflix original, the story or whatever you call it was too bad to continue. Not sure who the writers are but damn it seems a bunch of rookies were sent to the deep end.
From the first episode you find yourself questioning if you're watching actual agents and their operations or people with no idea about spies role-playing for fun.
The acting talent was not bad but when the script is this weak, there seems little that can save it. If this is not your genre go for it but if you truly enjoy spy thrillers, give this a miss.
Even though I lower the bar for a Netflix original, the story or whatever you call it was too bad to continue. Not sure who the writers are but damn it seems a bunch of rookies were sent to the deep end.
From the first episode you find yourself questioning if you're watching actual agents and their operations or people with no idea about spies role-playing for fun.
The acting talent was not bad but when the script is this weak, there seems little that can save it. If this is not your genre go for it but if you truly enjoy spy thrillers, give this a miss.
Find it difficult to believe MI6 boss needs to be and is expected to be home for dinner and to put his kids to bed every night. Ridiculous to see the wife overreacting & dishing to her long lost friend that her husband had to go to a record store at 10:00pm to get a gift for someone when she knows his job probably entails weird, secret behaviors and actions. He's a spy, he does spy stuff. You should know this and not get all upset and jealous when he's on his laptop in the middle of the night. I thought the show looked interesting, but shut it off before end of first episode because too far fetched.
I feel that a lot of the armchair-agents out there are giving this show an unfairly low rating. It's not a documentary for heaven's sake - it's a rather entertaining show set w/in the world of espionage and family drama.
Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.
I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.
I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.
I feel that a lot of the armchair-agents out there are giving this show an unfairly low rating. It's not a documentary for heaven's sake - it's a rather entertaining show set w/in the world of espionage and family drama.
Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.
I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.
I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.
Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.
I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.
I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.
I feel that a lot of the armchair-agents out there are giving this show an unfairly low rating. It's not a documentary for heaven's sake - it's a rather entertaining show set w/in the world of espionage and family drama.
Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.
I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.
I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLeading ladies Olga Kurylenko (Kara) and Oona Chaplin (Maddy) both appeared in the James Bond movie 007 Quantum (2008), Oona's mother Geraldine Chaplin having played a bit part in the earlier Casino Royale (1967).
- GaffesMaddy does not know her own ethnic origin: She denies that her name "DaCosta" is Portuguese (which it is) and states that it is Spanish (which it can't be. That would make her name "De La Costa", and she comes from what originally would have to be the Spanish aristocracy)
- ConnexionsFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #6.35 (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Treason have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Treason
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 41m
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant








