Après s'être noyée pour échapper à son mari violent, le cerveau de Bella Baxter est remplacé par celui de son enfant à naître.Après s'être noyée pour échapper à son mari violent, le cerveau de Bella Baxter est remplacé par celui de son enfant à naître.Après s'être noyée pour échapper à son mari violent, le cerveau de Bella Baxter est remplacé par celui de son enfant à naître.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- A remporté 4 oscars
- 120 victoires et 426 nominations au total
Anders Olof Grundberg
- Kid in London Street
- (as Anders Grundberg)
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Poor Things' is visually striking with standout performances by Emma Stone and Willem Dafoe. It delves into feminism, liberation, and societal norms through a surreal lens. Critics laud its unique cinematography and bold storytelling but note uneven pacing and character depth. The film's sexual content and portrayal of Bella have sparked controversy, making it a thought-provoking yet divisive experience.
Avis en vedette
Clearly a lot of people enjoyed this grotesque movie, but it wasn't for me. Some of the scenes in it made me feel sick, and maybe they were supposed to, but it seemed unnecessary. Don't even get me started on how pretentious the movie was.
I also found this movie very frustrating because the acting was good, the sets and costuming were good, and some scenes used striking cinematography. These things all made me feel like I should've liked the movie, but I don't. It could have been put to much better use.
The sex and nudity is beyond gratuitous. I'm usually not bothered by sex scenes in movies, but for this particular film it felt perverted. Maybe the director has a weird fetish.
Ultimately, this film made me want to crack my own head open and pour bleach over my brain. It's one of those movies I'd like to block out. I don't think I'll ever watch anything else by Lanthimos.
I also found this movie very frustrating because the acting was good, the sets and costuming were good, and some scenes used striking cinematography. These things all made me feel like I should've liked the movie, but I don't. It could have been put to much better use.
The sex and nudity is beyond gratuitous. I'm usually not bothered by sex scenes in movies, but for this particular film it felt perverted. Maybe the director has a weird fetish.
Ultimately, this film made me want to crack my own head open and pour bleach over my brain. It's one of those movies I'd like to block out. I don't think I'll ever watch anything else by Lanthimos.
The movie explores the women's condition in our society trough the story of a girl who comes back to life. All her experience are a metaphore of real life, it makes you think what it is happening around us. Emma Stone is superlative in her role, Willem Defoe and Mark Ruffalo are the perfect supporting cast. The last point is about the director: he is able to show the story in a brilliant way passing from the back comedy (Tim Burton's style) to some dramatic scenes. The photography is changing during the movie, scenes are shown from different point of views. Also the music is perfect, it creates the atmosphere. The final result is an original movie, which analyses deeply our current.
"Poor Things" is a film that definitely lives up to its title. Adapted from the novel by Alasdair Gray, it's a bizarre blend of science fiction, dark comedy, and feminist critique.
The "weird" factor starts right at the beginning. We meet Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe), a mad scientist obsessed with reviving the dead. His latest project: a beautiful young woman named Bella (Emma Stone) who, thanks to some unconventional brain surgery, possesses both childlike innocence and uninhibited desires. Throw in a menagerie of hybrid animals, quirky characters, and a darkly comedic Victorian setting, and you've got a recipe for something truly strange.
But is it good weird, or just plain weird?
Fans of director Yorgos Lanthimos (known for his offbeat films like "The Lobster" and "The Favourite") will likely find themselves right at home. He delivers his signature brand of absurdist humor and unsettling social commentary. The film is visually striking, with a dreamlike quality that perfectly complements the bizarre narrative.
However, those who prefer a more conventional story might be left scratching their heads. The plot takes some unexpected turns, and the humor is definitely on the dry, deadpan side.
So, should you see "Poor Things"?
If you're looking for a unique and thought-provoking film experience, then definitely give it a shot. Just be prepared for something a little out there.
Here's a quick breakdown:
Pros: Visually stunning, great performances (especially Stone and Dafoe), clever dark humor, unique story Cons: Very strange (might not be for everyone), unconventional plot, dry humor Ultimately, "Poor Things" is a film that will stay with you long after the credits roll. Whether you love it or hate it, there's no denying it's a memorable experience.
The "weird" factor starts right at the beginning. We meet Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe), a mad scientist obsessed with reviving the dead. His latest project: a beautiful young woman named Bella (Emma Stone) who, thanks to some unconventional brain surgery, possesses both childlike innocence and uninhibited desires. Throw in a menagerie of hybrid animals, quirky characters, and a darkly comedic Victorian setting, and you've got a recipe for something truly strange.
But is it good weird, or just plain weird?
Fans of director Yorgos Lanthimos (known for his offbeat films like "The Lobster" and "The Favourite") will likely find themselves right at home. He delivers his signature brand of absurdist humor and unsettling social commentary. The film is visually striking, with a dreamlike quality that perfectly complements the bizarre narrative.
However, those who prefer a more conventional story might be left scratching their heads. The plot takes some unexpected turns, and the humor is definitely on the dry, deadpan side.
So, should you see "Poor Things"?
If you're looking for a unique and thought-provoking film experience, then definitely give it a shot. Just be prepared for something a little out there.
Here's a quick breakdown:
Pros: Visually stunning, great performances (especially Stone and Dafoe), clever dark humor, unique story Cons: Very strange (might not be for everyone), unconventional plot, dry humor Ultimately, "Poor Things" is a film that will stay with you long after the credits roll. Whether you love it or hate it, there's no denying it's a memorable experience.
I watched the movie without really knowing what to expect. The trailer seemed interesting, I thought the idea was pretty original.
Some characters I could never really warm up to, but maybe that was supposed to be the point. I loved the father-daughter dynamic between Bella and Godwin.
Overall it feels a bit like a fever dream, never knowing what is real and what is just imagination. The cinematography is stunning, very colourful and just beautiful sets and I enjoyed the originality of the camera angles too. The cast did an amazing job, especially Emma Stone really carried the movie, portraying Bella as strange but likeable.
Some characters I could never really warm up to, but maybe that was supposed to be the point. I loved the father-daughter dynamic between Bella and Godwin.
Overall it feels a bit like a fever dream, never knowing what is real and what is just imagination. The cinematography is stunning, very colourful and just beautiful sets and I enjoyed the originality of the camera angles too. The cast did an amazing job, especially Emma Stone really carried the movie, portraying Bella as strange but likeable.
Yorgos Lanthimos's latest offering, "Poor Things," is a cinematic rollercoaster that throws absurdity, social commentary, and dark humor into a blender and hits puree. It's a film that will leave you bewildered, amused, and maybe a little bit grossed out, but undeniably entertained.
The story centers around Bella Baxter (played with delightful naiveté by Emma Stone), a Frankensteinian creation brought to life by the eccentric Dr. Godwin (Mark Rylance). Reborn with the brain of a drowned child and the body of a young woman, Bella is thrust into a world that both fascinates and confuses her. Her childlike innocence clashes hilariously with the societal mores of the 19th century, leading to a series of outrageous situations that push the boundaries of good taste and propriety.
Lanthimos, known for his penchant for the bizarre, doesn't shy away from the grotesque in "Poor Things." Bodily fluids flow freely, sexual encounters are depicted with a bluntness that borders on the pornographic, and violence erupts with unexpected ferocity. Yet, amidst the chaos, there's a darkly comedic undercurrent that keeps the film from becoming merely shocking. Lanthimos uses humor to highlight the absurdity of social norms and the hypocrisy of those who uphold them.
The film's visuals are equally striking. Robbie Ryan's cinematography blends dreamlike beauty with unsettling distortions, creating a world that feels both familiar and alien. The production design is sumptuous, with meticulously crafted sets and costumes that transport us to a fantastical version of Victorian England.
"Poor Things" is not a film for everyone. Its offbeat humor, graphic content, and unconventional narrative will likely alienate some viewers. However, for those willing to embrace its strangeness, the film offers a unique and thought-provoking experience. It's a wild ride, but one that ultimately leaves you pondering the nature of humanity, the meaning of life, and the absurdity of the world we live in.
**Here are some additional points to consider:**
* The film has been praised for its performances, with particular acclaim for Emma Stone's portrayal of Bella.
* Some critics have found the film's humor to be too crass or mean-spirited.
* The film's pacing can be uneven, with some scenes dragging and others feeling rushed.
* Despite its flaws, "Poor Things" is a visually stunning and intellectually stimulating film that is sure to spark conversation.
**Overall, I recommend "Poor Things" to fans of Yorgos Lanthimos's work and those who enjoy offbeat comedies with a dark edge. Just be prepared for a wild ride.**
The story centers around Bella Baxter (played with delightful naiveté by Emma Stone), a Frankensteinian creation brought to life by the eccentric Dr. Godwin (Mark Rylance). Reborn with the brain of a drowned child and the body of a young woman, Bella is thrust into a world that both fascinates and confuses her. Her childlike innocence clashes hilariously with the societal mores of the 19th century, leading to a series of outrageous situations that push the boundaries of good taste and propriety.
Lanthimos, known for his penchant for the bizarre, doesn't shy away from the grotesque in "Poor Things." Bodily fluids flow freely, sexual encounters are depicted with a bluntness that borders on the pornographic, and violence erupts with unexpected ferocity. Yet, amidst the chaos, there's a darkly comedic undercurrent that keeps the film from becoming merely shocking. Lanthimos uses humor to highlight the absurdity of social norms and the hypocrisy of those who uphold them.
The film's visuals are equally striking. Robbie Ryan's cinematography blends dreamlike beauty with unsettling distortions, creating a world that feels both familiar and alien. The production design is sumptuous, with meticulously crafted sets and costumes that transport us to a fantastical version of Victorian England.
"Poor Things" is not a film for everyone. Its offbeat humor, graphic content, and unconventional narrative will likely alienate some viewers. However, for those willing to embrace its strangeness, the film offers a unique and thought-provoking experience. It's a wild ride, but one that ultimately leaves you pondering the nature of humanity, the meaning of life, and the absurdity of the world we live in.
**Here are some additional points to consider:**
* The film has been praised for its performances, with particular acclaim for Emma Stone's portrayal of Bella.
* Some critics have found the film's humor to be too crass or mean-spirited.
* The film's pacing can be uneven, with some scenes dragging and others feeling rushed.
* Despite its flaws, "Poor Things" is a visually stunning and intellectually stimulating film that is sure to spark conversation.
**Overall, I recommend "Poor Things" to fans of Yorgos Lanthimos's work and those who enjoy offbeat comedies with a dark edge. Just be prepared for a wild ride.**
The Movies of Yorgos Lanthimos
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMark Ruffalo had a lot of doubts about his performance during the shoot. He often half-joked that his friend Oscar Isaac, who was filming on a nearby sound stage, was going to be called in to replace him. One day, Willem Dafoe pranked Ruffalo by taking him to a room where Isaac (who was in on the joke) was waiting. Isaac and Dafoe informed Ruffalo he was fired and, indeed, getting replaced by Isaac.
- GaffesMark Ruffalo's attempt at a British accent is extremely unconvincing.
However, an unconvincing accent is simply a limitation of the actor's ability and not a mistake on the part of the filmmakers. Also, what is considered unconvincing is a subjective matter of opinion.
- Citations
Bella Baxter: [on the wailing infant] I must go punch that baby.
- Générique farfeluThe opening and closing credits are shown as a frame around the image.
- Autres versionsThe UK's BBFC viewed the film during editing to provide advice on classification, and informed the distributor it required changes to one short sequence to secure an "18" rating. The scene depicted sexual activity in the presence of children. Under UK law, this could be illegal and therefore required removal before being distributed within the country. The changes were made before formal classification, and this same version of the film was ultimately released everywhere.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Movies of 2023 (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Poor Things
- Lieux de tournage
- Origo Film Studio, Budapest, Hongrie(soundstages)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 35 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 34 553 225 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 661 230 $ US
- 10 déc. 2023
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 117 625 455 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 21m(141 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







