Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueOn March 13, 1997, thousands watching for Halle-Bopp Comet saw a huge V-shaped light formation cross Arizona's sky. The silent, low-flying phenomenon made national headlines on major network... Tout lireOn March 13, 1997, thousands watching for Halle-Bopp Comet saw a huge V-shaped light formation cross Arizona's sky. The silent, low-flying phenomenon made national headlines on major networks and news shows.On March 13, 1997, thousands watching for Halle-Bopp Comet saw a huge V-shaped light formation cross Arizona's sky. The silent, low-flying phenomenon made national headlines on major networks and news shows.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 4 nominations au total
Lynne Kitei
- Self - Health Educator and Author
- (as Lynne D. Kitei M.D.)
Ruth Hover
- Self - Psychologist
- (as Ruth Hover Ph.D.)
Frances Emma Barwood
- Self - Former Phoenix Councilwoman & Vice Mayor
- (as Frances Barwood)
Daniel J. Kitei
- Self - Resident Physician in Neurology
- (as Daniel J. Kitei D.O.)
Edgar D. Mitchell
- Self - Apollo 14 Astronaut and Founder of the Institute of Noetic Science
- (as Edgar Mitchell Ph.D.)
Tom Brunty
- Self - Religious Studies Arizona State University
- (as Tom Brunty M.A.)
Joan Mortensen
- Self - Critical Care Nurse
- (as Joan Mortensen R.N.)
Gary Schwartz
- Self - Professor of Medicine Surgery & Psychology, University of Arizona
- (as Gary Schwartz Ph.D.)
Richard Powell
- Self - V.P. of Research University of Arizona
- (as Richard Powell Ph.D.)
Avis en vedette
"The Phoenix Lights," for all its importance and for all the obvious conviction behind it, gets itself all twisted into a pretzel because neither the visuals nor the witnesses seem able to distinguish between two entirely independent events.
Near sundown, a giant V-shaped formation of lights, perhaps a mile across, passed southward over Henderson, Nevada, interrupting a Little League baseball game. Hundred of witnesses stared up at the thing. It moved slowly and silently out of sight at low altitude. After dark, it passed down I-10 and flew over Phoenix, continuing southward towards Mexico. There is no question about its existence or its properties. It was witnessed by thousands of people, including law enforcement officers, professionals of various types, air traffic controllers, and military and civilian pilots.
Later that night, some Air Force Warthogs apparently dropped a series of bright flares during an exercise. The flares were in a series and disappeared one by one behind the mountains into the target area. The flares were photographed by numerous people, many of the good folk of Phoenix having been alerted to and excited by strange happenings in the sky, by this time.
Nobody knows what the first thing was. So the response of the public becomes, by default, the more interesting story. Somehow, the original story bled into the second. The huge triangle is dismissed as "Air Force flares." A Phoenix councilwoman, entering her office, was asked the morning after the event if she knew anything about the triangle. She'd heard nothing about it but she brought the subject up at the meeting, where it was dismissed with a single joking reply. Her question made it into the media, however, and her office phone lit up. When her answering machine could no longer handle the volume, the phones of other offices were called into play. She estimates the number of phone calls from eyewitnesses to the original incident at a thousand. She managed to respond in person to several hundred of them. In its description of the reports, the media singled out one, from a young boy who thought they were airplanes. Thereafter, the sightings were described as man-made objects mistaken for something else. The governor's response was to make a public announcement dismissing the affair, while accompanied by a staff member dressed in an extra-terrestrial costume.
The film was organized by a married couple, both doctors, living on the outskirts of Phoenix. Both had seen the giant triangle with its quiet amber lights. But although the movie was written by one of the docs, it couldn't be more confusing. She evidently saw lights on several different occasions and there were times -- long moments -- in which I didn't know which sighting she was talking about or which picture of which sighting I was looking at.
Too much time is wasted on "ancient visitations" and that sort of irrelevant stuff. And all the witnesses, including the two docs, seem convinced that they observed something from outer space. In the film, the witnesses describe the triangular orange lights as having a calming effect, almost deliberate. One likens it to a parade designed to show humans that "they" have no destructive intentions.
I'm a kind of scientist too, and I'm not so sure about all that. It's too much akin to Kierkegaard's "leap of (or to) faith", the "faith", in this case, lying in what Alan Hyneck called the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. It seems undeniable that something was there -- but what? Sure, it could be a space ship with aliens inside, or a kind of drone, but other explanations are possible. We now believe that matter can take four forms -- solid, gas, liquid, plasma -- but suppose there are others that occur more rarely and take forms like triangles or spheres. Suppose the objects aren't objects at all, but neural impulses in the mind of some cosmic intelligence? Can we be sure they aren't? Every explanation seems as absurd as any other.
The film is screwed up and that's too bad because we need to know more about the thing and its movements than we do about feelings of awe and visits in Biblical times. I'm personally convinced that something is going on because when I was in high school, at three in the morning of a bitterly cold night on an empty rural road, a friend and I witnessed the antics of a moon-like sphere in the crystalline atmosphere. It was fuzzy and bright, flew against the wind, wobbled slowly from side to side, made not a sound, and did a right-angle turn. I don't know what it was, although I waved and shouted at it. Nobody knows what it was. But if you're going to speculate, I would hope you would organize a film better than this.
Near sundown, a giant V-shaped formation of lights, perhaps a mile across, passed southward over Henderson, Nevada, interrupting a Little League baseball game. Hundred of witnesses stared up at the thing. It moved slowly and silently out of sight at low altitude. After dark, it passed down I-10 and flew over Phoenix, continuing southward towards Mexico. There is no question about its existence or its properties. It was witnessed by thousands of people, including law enforcement officers, professionals of various types, air traffic controllers, and military and civilian pilots.
Later that night, some Air Force Warthogs apparently dropped a series of bright flares during an exercise. The flares were in a series and disappeared one by one behind the mountains into the target area. The flares were photographed by numerous people, many of the good folk of Phoenix having been alerted to and excited by strange happenings in the sky, by this time.
Nobody knows what the first thing was. So the response of the public becomes, by default, the more interesting story. Somehow, the original story bled into the second. The huge triangle is dismissed as "Air Force flares." A Phoenix councilwoman, entering her office, was asked the morning after the event if she knew anything about the triangle. She'd heard nothing about it but she brought the subject up at the meeting, where it was dismissed with a single joking reply. Her question made it into the media, however, and her office phone lit up. When her answering machine could no longer handle the volume, the phones of other offices were called into play. She estimates the number of phone calls from eyewitnesses to the original incident at a thousand. She managed to respond in person to several hundred of them. In its description of the reports, the media singled out one, from a young boy who thought they were airplanes. Thereafter, the sightings were described as man-made objects mistaken for something else. The governor's response was to make a public announcement dismissing the affair, while accompanied by a staff member dressed in an extra-terrestrial costume.
The film was organized by a married couple, both doctors, living on the outskirts of Phoenix. Both had seen the giant triangle with its quiet amber lights. But although the movie was written by one of the docs, it couldn't be more confusing. She evidently saw lights on several different occasions and there were times -- long moments -- in which I didn't know which sighting she was talking about or which picture of which sighting I was looking at.
Too much time is wasted on "ancient visitations" and that sort of irrelevant stuff. And all the witnesses, including the two docs, seem convinced that they observed something from outer space. In the film, the witnesses describe the triangular orange lights as having a calming effect, almost deliberate. One likens it to a parade designed to show humans that "they" have no destructive intentions.
I'm a kind of scientist too, and I'm not so sure about all that. It's too much akin to Kierkegaard's "leap of (or to) faith", the "faith", in this case, lying in what Alan Hyneck called the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. It seems undeniable that something was there -- but what? Sure, it could be a space ship with aliens inside, or a kind of drone, but other explanations are possible. We now believe that matter can take four forms -- solid, gas, liquid, plasma -- but suppose there are others that occur more rarely and take forms like triangles or spheres. Suppose the objects aren't objects at all, but neural impulses in the mind of some cosmic intelligence? Can we be sure they aren't? Every explanation seems as absurd as any other.
The film is screwed up and that's too bad because we need to know more about the thing and its movements than we do about feelings of awe and visits in Biblical times. I'm personally convinced that something is going on because when I was in high school, at three in the morning of a bitterly cold night on an empty rural road, a friend and I witnessed the antics of a moon-like sphere in the crystalline atmosphere. It was fuzzy and bright, flew against the wind, wobbled slowly from side to side, made not a sound, and did a right-angle turn. I don't know what it was, although I waved and shouted at it. Nobody knows what it was. But if you're going to speculate, I would hope you would organize a film better than this.
Watch this for entertainment value only. This is by no measure a documentary featuring any significant critical thought on this subject. It's basically a continuous stream of "Gee I saw sumthin'in the sky!" testimonials which, as an earlier reviewer noted, becomes very tedious after 30-40 minutes.
I have no doubt that thousands of people "saw sumpthin'" unusual in the night skies over Phoenix in March of 1997. But this "documentary" trades purely in the most outlandish and exotic explanations (i.e. visitors from another planet) for that spectacle.
So if you're the type of person who enjoys such meta-science documentaries you'll probably enjoy this film. But if yours is a more critical mind don't waste 90 minutes on it. You wont be either (a) better informed, or (b) convinced by the thesis.
I have no doubt that thousands of people "saw sumpthin'" unusual in the night skies over Phoenix in March of 1997. But this "documentary" trades purely in the most outlandish and exotic explanations (i.e. visitors from another planet) for that spectacle.
So if you're the type of person who enjoys such meta-science documentaries you'll probably enjoy this film. But if yours is a more critical mind don't waste 90 minutes on it. You wont be either (a) better informed, or (b) convinced by the thesis.
A documentary provides more than a one sided perspective. This film does not.
Poor direction and too much of the same ole same ole. The redundancy made this film less compelling. What a shame.
In the trivia section here, I read it received best documentary and best director awards- from WHO? The Girl Scout? Anyone can give awards- just like little leaguers. Maybe that comment was written by the directors, who knows!
That being said, I can't imagine we are the only beings in the universe. I don't know what everyone saw, but over 10,000 people did see something. I do agree that we need to be more open minded and stop fighting with each other. Z3
In the trivia section here, I read it received best documentary and best director awards- from WHO? The Girl Scout? Anyone can give awards- just like little leaguers. Maybe that comment was written by the directors, who knows!
That being said, I can't imagine we are the only beings in the universe. I don't know what everyone saw, but over 10,000 people did see something. I do agree that we need to be more open minded and stop fighting with each other. Z3
The visual evidence shown in the film was not terribly convincing, in my opinion; however, the witness testimonies and statistics were very compelling in support of some sort of aircraft that could be explained as extraterrestrial, or some very advanced technology that we possess.
The film points out that if the event were part of a covert military or other governmental operation, it would not take place over highly populated areas. Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the event was not a covert military operation.
It is obviously true that the film is not presented as a balanced expose that provides all sides of the story. But, I was OK with that, because it was not expressed or even implied to be a purely journalistic piece as such. It's a documentary that presents evidence and reasoning for the existence of extraterrestrial crafts, and therefore extraterrestrial beings, most likely.
It left me considering the possibility of extraterrestrial visitations. And why not? Considering the statistical odds of other life forms existing on planets in solar systems in our universe, and that some are likely to have had technology for thousands of years longer than we, it seems possible that we are being visited. And, the evidence reasoned in the film at least should cause us to wonder, and not summarily dismiss it as flares, which seems more like a propaganda story that was fed to the masses than accurate.
Jared.
The film points out that if the event were part of a covert military or other governmental operation, it would not take place over highly populated areas. Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the event was not a covert military operation.
It is obviously true that the film is not presented as a balanced expose that provides all sides of the story. But, I was OK with that, because it was not expressed or even implied to be a purely journalistic piece as such. It's a documentary that presents evidence and reasoning for the existence of extraterrestrial crafts, and therefore extraterrestrial beings, most likely.
It left me considering the possibility of extraterrestrial visitations. And why not? Considering the statistical odds of other life forms existing on planets in solar systems in our universe, and that some are likely to have had technology for thousands of years longer than we, it seems possible that we are being visited. And, the evidence reasoned in the film at least should cause us to wonder, and not summarily dismiss it as flares, which seems more like a propaganda story that was fed to the masses than accurate.
Jared.
For those interested in the details and data surrounding the most documented and important mass UFO incident in modern history, this intriguing and well produced film is for you. It also presents an expansive overview of a controversial & enigmatic topic, filled with authenticated photographic evidence, as well as credible testimonials from Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, pilots, military and first-hand witnesses, including former AZ Governor Fife Symington, who confirm the reality that advanced, anomalous & "Unearthly" aerial phenomena (silent mile wide V shaped objects with equidistant lights) traversed at low altitude throughout Arizona on March 13, 1997 and have been reported for centuries worldwide. To date, the event has never been explained or re-enacted. Enlightening and educational film for the entire family.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe documentary includes two statements by witnesses under hidden identity:
- a Luke Air Force Base military,
- a civilian pilot, identified years later as himself by actor Kurt Russell; on March 13, 1997, he logged an aviation report at the Sky Harbor airport, where he landed after witnessing with his child son, the six lights in a v-shaped formation when he was preparing to land. He also registered the fact in his own logbook, but years later he had forgotten about it and was surprised to see himself on a television run of the movie. The actor is a former military helicopter and fighter pilot and FAA-licensed private pilot holding single and multi-engine capacities.
- ConnexionsReferences Les Envahisseurs de la Planète Rouge (1953)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Phoenix Lights?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Phoenix Lights: Beyond Top Secret
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant