ÉVALUATION IMDb
3,6/10
2,2 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA restless girl embarks on a journey back to a city populated by the dead in search of a mysterious internet lover.A restless girl embarks on a journey back to a city populated by the dead in search of a mysterious internet lover.A restless girl embarks on a journey back to a city populated by the dead in search of a mysterious internet lover.
Brittany Renee Finamore
- Justine
- (as Brittany Finamore)
Robert Gibson
- Bluesman
- (as Robert 'One String' Gibson)
Marcus M. Mauldin
- Burly Man
- (as Marcus Mauldin)
Avis en vedette
Here we go again with PULSE. Now we have more ridiculous crap to watch. The first PULSE was good, the second was garbage, but this one takes the cake.
Much like PULSE 2, the acting was wooden, the story was extremely weak, the effects are lazy and green screen shots. But this time, they really made this series suck. The characters are now total idiots, and the story can't stay consistent.
Now the PULSE series is dead, THANK YOU DIMENSION FILMS. You guys took a decent horror movie and turned it into a shitty trilogy.
Never see this movie. It is utter garbage. It's even worse than PULSE 2.
1/10
Much like PULSE 2, the acting was wooden, the story was extremely weak, the effects are lazy and green screen shots. But this time, they really made this series suck. The characters are now total idiots, and the story can't stay consistent.
Now the PULSE series is dead, THANK YOU DIMENSION FILMS. You guys took a decent horror movie and turned it into a shitty trilogy.
Never see this movie. It is utter garbage. It's even worse than PULSE 2.
1/10
well, joel soisson continue to prove that he shouldn't have skipped these directing classes...
the movie has no story line, no acting whatsoever, and absolutely no Horror... when i was going through the movie my eyes was focused on the forward button all the time... really the movie can be summarized in (at most) 5 minutes... and i am saying that while being a huge fan of the first part... the second was really not up to the expectation and so is this...
90% of the actual events that could entertain a viewer happened in the last 9 minutes, and the rest is just a boring filling, i didn't at all love the star of the movie, but she couldn't help it... the dialogs were poor.
and at the end please don't use an Indian girl to play an Egyptian rule... it offends me :)
the movie has no story line, no acting whatsoever, and absolutely no Horror... when i was going through the movie my eyes was focused on the forward button all the time... really the movie can be summarized in (at most) 5 minutes... and i am saying that while being a huge fan of the first part... the second was really not up to the expectation and so is this...
90% of the actual events that could entertain a viewer happened in the last 9 minutes, and the rest is just a boring filling, i didn't at all love the star of the movie, but she couldn't help it... the dialogs were poor.
and at the end please don't use an Indian girl to play an Egyptian rule... it offends me :)
I watched this movie yesterday and I'm still shocked at the quality and performance. The graphics were so shocking I could not believe it. I mean it was the worst photoshop I have ever seen, I could probably do better. The film was so low budget, they didn't even have enough money to hire a room to shoot it in. The whole film you could see the fake background. Even in scenes where the girl is in woods, it was still graphics? Why? Woods are everywhere they could have just find a park or something, but no it's the fake background. The story line was poor, very poor. No proper plot or background to the story and did not really make a logical connection to previous films. Because I thought the the ghosts are bad, but no, half of the film they are good and half of the film they are bad again. Overall, my advice, do not waste your time and watch something (anything) else instead.
This seems to be one of those sequels that got shot back-to-back with another. And like strangely so often enough, this sequel turned out much better than the other one actually.
This time it actually does follow a decent story, that offers some tension and mystery as well. It's the last part of the trilogy and I don't think any other sequels will come, since the story got pretty much closed. And it's not like this is a profitable enough franchise for the studios to cash in on anyway.
It also probably is the least confusing movie out of the trilogy. It's pretty much being straight-forward and it doesn't spend too much time lingering, or trying to give the story multiple layers and deeper meanings to it all. It makes this the most pleasant one to watch out of the entire trilogy, as well. The movie keeps flowing well at all time and manages to remain interesting throughout, though it still perhaps falls kind of flat toward the end.
Its effects also work out better in this one. It actually all serves a purpose and I can also say that this movie works out better as an horror as well. Not that the horror fans or anyone else will go crazy about this movie but it just happens to be so that it's all being a positive improvement over the previous sequel.
Unlike the second movie, this movie pretty much follows the events of the previous movie. It of course helped that both movies got shot back-to-back. It pretty much continues on the same story and follows some of the same characters but also introduces some new ones. These are all good things for this movie.
Simply a good and watchable third and final(?) installment.
6/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
This time it actually does follow a decent story, that offers some tension and mystery as well. It's the last part of the trilogy and I don't think any other sequels will come, since the story got pretty much closed. And it's not like this is a profitable enough franchise for the studios to cash in on anyway.
It also probably is the least confusing movie out of the trilogy. It's pretty much being straight-forward and it doesn't spend too much time lingering, or trying to give the story multiple layers and deeper meanings to it all. It makes this the most pleasant one to watch out of the entire trilogy, as well. The movie keeps flowing well at all time and manages to remain interesting throughout, though it still perhaps falls kind of flat toward the end.
Its effects also work out better in this one. It actually all serves a purpose and I can also say that this movie works out better as an horror as well. Not that the horror fans or anyone else will go crazy about this movie but it just happens to be so that it's all being a positive improvement over the previous sequel.
Unlike the second movie, this movie pretty much follows the events of the previous movie. It of course helped that both movies got shot back-to-back. It pretty much continues on the same story and follows some of the same characters but also introduces some new ones. These are all good things for this movie.
Simply a good and watchable third and final(?) installment.
6/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
Whoever did this: quit cinema. It's not interesting on any level. It even makes me doubt which film is worse: the previous or this one.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film debut of Lynn Blackburn.
- Gaffes(at around 11 min. into the film) When the people in the camp are at the table, you can hear a cell phone ringing, but no cell phones or computers can be used because they cause the ghosts to appear.
- Citations
Salwa: It's like... some kind of suicide cult or something. I'm not kidding here. Come on, Adam. Wake up. You have to see this. I don't know if it's real or not. But, if it is... Adam, I am really getting freaked out here. Adam, I really need to talk to you. I want to turn it off, but... I can't.
- Générique farfeluWatch after the credits for an additional scene. The last string of the guitar player's guitar at the camp breaks and he looks at it in despair.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Phelous & the Movies: Pulselousdotcom.com 3 (2010)
- Bandes originalesRussian Opera
Courtesy of Chicago Music Library, Malibu, Ca
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Pulse 3?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 31 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant