[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementsLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreEn tête du box-officeHoraire des présentations et billetsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À l'affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléSéries télé les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    À regarderDernières bandes-annoncesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteFamily Entertainment GuideBalados IMDb
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuidePrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
IMDbPro

House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic

  • 2009
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 30m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,5/10
618
MA NOTE
House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic (2009)
A documentary look at world impressions and definitions of HIV/AIDS
Liretrailer2 min 45 s
1 vidéo
21 photos
Documentary

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhat is HIV? What is AIDS? What is being done to cure it? These questions sent Canadian filmmaker Brent Leung on a worldwide journey, from the highest echelons of the medical research establ... Tout lireWhat is HIV? What is AIDS? What is being done to cure it? These questions sent Canadian filmmaker Brent Leung on a worldwide journey, from the highest echelons of the medical research establishment to the slums of South Africa, where death and disease are the order of the day. In... Tout lireWhat is HIV? What is AIDS? What is being done to cure it? These questions sent Canadian filmmaker Brent Leung on a worldwide journey, from the highest echelons of the medical research establishment to the slums of South Africa, where death and disease are the order of the day. In this up-to-the-minute documentary, he observes that although AIDS has been front-page new... Tout lire

  • Director
    • Brent Leung
  • Writer
    • Llewellyn Chapman
  • Stars
    • Luc Montagnier
    • Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
    • Anthony Fauci
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    5,5/10
    618
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • Brent Leung
    • Writer
      • Llewellyn Chapman
    • Stars
      • Luc Montagnier
      • Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
      • Anthony Fauci
    • 39Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 6Commentaires de critiques
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
    • Prix
      • 1 victoire au total

    Vidéos1

    House of Numbers
    Trailer 2:45
    House of Numbers

    Photos21

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 16
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux67

    Modifier
    Luc Montagnier
    Luc Montagnier
    • Self - Discoverer of HIV
    Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
    • Self - Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine
    • (as Francois Barre-Sinnousi)
    Anthony Fauci
    Anthony Fauci
    • Self
    Kenneth Cole
    Kenneth Cole
    • Self - Chairman of the Board, amfAR
    James Curran
    • Self - Former Director, CDC AIDS Division
    David Baltimore
    • Self - Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine
    Donald P. Francis
    • Self - Epidemiologist, CDC
    Michael Gottlieb
    • Self - First Doctor to Diagnose AIDS, UCLA Medical Center
    Harold Jaffe
    • Self - Former Director, CDC AIDS Division
    Daniel Kuritzkes
    • Self - Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
    Reinhard Kurth
    • Self - President, Robert Koch Institute Germany
    Joseph B. McCormick
    • Self - Epidemiologist, CDC
    John P. Moore
    • Self - Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medical College
    Peter Piot
    • Self - Executive Director, UNAIDS
    Donald Abrams
    Donald Abrams
    • Self - Chief of Hematology-Oncology, San Francisco General Hospital
    Kim Bannon
    • Self
    Robert Bazell
    • Self - Health and Science Correspondent
    • (archive footage)
    • (voice)
    Tom Bethell
    • Self - Investigative Journalist
    • Director
      • Brent Leung
    • Writer
      • Llewellyn Chapman
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs39

    5,5618
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    1jon-a-cartwright

    An "objective" documentary? Read this first

    I'm a journalist who has spent some time investigating AIDS denialism and those who have been affected by it. This film is very dangerous, and will likely lead to many lost lives.

    Since it would take too long here to debunk the various outrageous claims made in the film, let me address just two points it conveniently glosses over:

    First, Christine Maggiore, the HIV+ activist who has avoided antiretroviral drugs with supposedly no ill consequences, is dead. She died of AIDS-related pneumonia, aged 52. Her daughter Eliza Jane, whose contraction of HIV was undoubtedly helped by Maggiore's refusal of antiretrovirals and breast feeding, also died of AIDS-related pneumonia, aged 3.

    Second, Kim Marie Bannon, another of the film's HIV+ activists who have avoided antiretroviral drugs with supposedly no ill consequences, is presently residing in a care home with HIV encephalitis. She is dying of AIDS.

    Why are these fairly important facts pushed to one side? Perhaps they got in the way of creating such an "objective" film.
    1peki1000

    How many people will die because of this?

    Its like one of these "condoms do not prevent AIDS" or "teach the controversy" moments. The most selective reporting you will ever see.. Picking out the least credible and dishonest people out there who want to make a name for themselves and earn some money and cutting out awkward peaces of interviews with those rare experts in ti. Crackpot journalists, pseudo scientists, and most of all conspiracy theorists..

    Exploiting poor African countries and its people, poorly qualified medical workers, those rare lucky individuals whose immune system successfully holds the virus at bay, etc.. Selecting out all these and all the possibly imaginable theories that could support his agenda..

    Why is there no cure? What is that supposed to mean?... Why is there no cure for Alzheimers, or cancer? If your BS alarm didn't go off at least a hundred times, them I am sorry, but you are naive and gullible.

    This Brent Leung is a criminal in my eyes.. I have seen references to this documentary on many sites now, which means people are actually believing this nonsense and it certainly means that there will indirectly be many lives lost because of this.

    This guy didn't even spare the poor guy that went with his agenda in desperation... "This guy is taking HIV medicine" and a few seconds later "He died shortly after recording this video", therefore don't take your medicine or you will die...

    Either homophobia is behind this, or some "christian family values", but certainly that deadly sort of inhumane capitalism and greed. Just because one is allowed to make money by selling lies and dangerous speculations, some lowlife will inevitably grab the opportunity..

    Its the most dishonest thing you will see, and all because this virus is really complicated and resilient, more than anything we previously encountered. It mutates so quickly that there are virtually millions of different strains out there.. Of course we had a lot of problems detecting and fighting it and of course scientists want as much money as they can get for fighting it. Of course you will find people that were misdiagnosed, etc, etc.

    Eh, it just makes me angry. This Brent Leung made a career and a lot of money out of this, while those crackpot wannabe "scientists" and "journalists" in it got a little attention and opened doors into conspiracy theory world..They will never see or hear about those ones that will die as a result of this documentary.
    1Sortyxt

    A huge waste of time

    This documentary is a waste of time for those who watch it and those who made it. All the "evidence" in this movie is either outdated, twisted out of context, or false.

    The most hysterical part is the beginning where the director says he has lots of questions about aids and is going on a journey to uncover the truth. It's obvious he is already a hardcore AIDS denier and only intends to present this point of view, no matter how illogical.

    I have a very open mind, and am an admitted conspiracy theorist. However, disproven conspiracies, such as this one, with no factual basis, are not worth learning about.

    Dear Mr. Director, if you really don't think the AIDS virus exists then why not just infect yourself and document your life for a few years? If it's as harmless as you say then you have nothing to worry about.
    2aberusugi

    Dishonest and misleading

    House of Numbers is a documentary that claims to have been made for the purpose of "searching for truth" so to speak. This seems to be a common trope among modern alarmist documentaries. We have ushered in the age of anti-science documentaries being big business, and there seems to be no shortage of people willing to make one to get a whole lot of money, for not a lot of research.

    There are many points in the movie where the directing is just awful. Constantly using the same shot to show the "investigator" at the same angle, slow motion moving in. From a cinematographic point of view this movie is vapid. The music was boring, obvious ripoffs of various improvised dramatic keyboard music from reality shows.

    Now on to the meat of the subject. Where to begin...

    Brent tries to push the point that you can't take a picture of HIV and no one ever has. Pretty sure simple google search could have solved this. Not only that, he dishonestly edited the interview with the man involved in this sequence to push his point. As of the time of my writing, you can watch the full unedited interview on the House of Numbers channel, and find out for yourself it was heavily edited to convey a different message.

    His claims about the Padian paper are false, and Dr. Padian herself has said that. Maggie, on camera, falsified the dates in her HIV tests and misinterpreted the results (either on purpose or because she was in denial), and there were obvious graphical manipulations with one of the tests shown to be deceitful, then died before the movie was released, of PNEUMONIA as caused by AIDS. The ending credits make a small note to her passing, and try to say it wasn't AIDS related. But honestly, the official story is she died from Pneumonia as a result of AIDS compromising her immune system.

    See it for yourself. I gave it a 2 instead of a one, because I would like to thank Brent for bringing this insidious cult-like AIDS denialism into the internet's skeptical eye. Now we can see that people who think like this do exist, and maybe change their minds. Oh and the film's creators don't find it fit to let anyone criticize what they have created. They have filed false DMCA's against a youtuber that made a 5 part video series over the past couple of months debunking many of the movies insinuations and claims. His videos were not for profit, no ads, and fell under Fair Use guidelines. They used the automatic takedown bot to try and silence someone who disagreed with them.

    If your opinions are that backed by the evidence, they should stand up to any and all criticism on their own merits, or you could present an official response. This kind of fascistic takedown tactic disgusts me and many on the internet. Like I said, check it out for yourself, and prepare to yell out loud in disbelief that people could actually be this stupid.
    3dennisne

    Deceptive and compelling obfuscation

    On the plus side, it's a wonderful demonstration of how compelling blatantly incorrect theories can be, using misquoted experts and ignoring well-known contradictions.

    In addition to the glaring omissions that JC from the UK pointed out here on 3 March 2010, many more can be found on Wikipedia, which denialists shockingly don't seem to be keen on "correcting": See WikiPedia's "AIDS_denialism" and "Misconceptions_about_HIV_and_AIDS".

    For example, the film points to the theory that Poppers were the root cause of Kaposi's Sarcoma in the original US gay community, but those Wikipedia pages point to real studies that conclusively disprove that theory. The film does not mention this.

    Also, two of the interviewed experts (Constantine and Weiss) explain how they were completely misquoted and misrepresented: See google for "constantine and weiss pinpoint misrepresentations"

    The idea of inaccurate HIV testing seemed to play a large role in the film, even though studies show it is 99.9% accurate. (I'm not sure if this includes PCR tests, which perhaps are 100% conclusive?) The film does not mention this.

    Also, the film refers to Padian's study on HIV transmission, but completely misrepresents it, as she herself explains: (See: "HIV heterosexual transmission and the Padian paper myth". Basically, she says the study was specifically analyzing safe-sex interventions (condom usage in couples), and simply showed the effectiveness of condoms, not the non-transmissibility of the virus. The film deceptively hides this piece of information.)

    The film is highly deceptive, and outright false on most of it's critical points. But it was an entertaining and compelling narrative while it lasted.

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    The Real Anthony Fauci
    6,6
    The Real Anthony Fauci
    Out of Shadows
    6,9
    Out of Shadows

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Gaffes
      A photo meeting between Ronald Reagan and Jacques Chirac wrongly informs that Chirac was the French President during a White House conference about AIDS in 1987. Chirac was France's Prime Minister at the time, sent by President François Mitterand.
    • Citations

      Celia Farber - Investigative Journalist: AIDS is the best example of what's really scary, alarming and dangerous about our culture right now, which is that it's a culture of PR. It's a Public Relations phenomenon. The truth doesn't matter, what matters is the image.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 19 avril 2009 (United States)
    • Pays d’origine
      • United States
    • Site officiel
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Дом из чисел
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Australie
    • société de production
      • Knowledge Matters
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 30 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.66 : 1

    Nouvelles connexes

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic (2009)
    Lacune principale
    What is the English language plot outline for House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic (2009)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Tâches
    • Conditions d’utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.