Bareuge salja

One of the most amazing and hilarious Korean movies out there. Groundbreaking storyline backed by spectacular dialogues and uplifted by quality acting. A cop who plays a role of bank robber inorder to indentify the loopholes and improve the security and policing of the city. The movie holds you tightly and there not even a minute when you fill lost. In conclusion a spectacular movie from 2007 which I finally got to see in 2021. That's the beauty of entertainment industry as a whole. When you create and craft great stuff it crosses the so called time boundaries and enters a dimension beyond Horizon.

Well. While some wry comedies may be subjected to reviewers in need of a new pair of glasses, this reviewer was entertained by both the premise and execution of this film. One need not expect high art or brilliant script, nor production standards exceeding that needed to portray a cop with eccentric integrity faced with a challenge that questions his role in life and as an enforcer of basic values.

So, Do Man meets the new Chief of police assigned to his station in the form of a traffic pattern violator while Do Man is performing his duties as a newly demoted-to traffic cop. Upon unerringly issuing a traffic ticket to said person, Do Man finds himself in a head to head play of wills after being charged by the new chief to act as the bank-robber in a police training simulation intended to quell critics of the departments inability to stop local bank heists.

Little did the new Chief of Police foresee the conviction Do Man would duly bring to bear in order to carry out his assignment. Ooooops!

This is a comedy. The acting is par given the intrinsic cultural subtlety and the scripts plot holes with which the actors were charged to respectively portray and abide. A dead guy driving a bus is simply loose plotting, but contrived for closure. That said, the subtle plot points and the tiny but poignant romance were enough to give this film warmth and value.

Perhaps there could be an INMCDB, ha ha. Some reviewers miss the point in the endeavor to be critics and not observers.

All said, this was an enjoyable film with originality in idea, and as such can be forgiven any flaws in execution as minor.

I can't remember when for the last time was I so charmed by the movie. Very ingenious script, congratulations to the script writers. Quite dense and, nevertheless, balanced story. As for the direction, I was very surprised to know that this film was a debut work of Ra Hee-Chan. A masterpiece!

And the last thing to mention to explain my feelings better. Not only me, but most Russians are charmed by this film, because the relations between people and police, shown there, are so far from what we observe in our everyday life. Russia has degraded to a full-fledged police state, where the police can kill people and avoid any prosecution. All government structures and judicial system are corrupt and are subject to the negative selection. As a result of this selection, we can only dream about non-criminal policemen and other officials. Presidential elections were heavily rigged (thousands of violations detected), the so-called President refuses to be replaceable. Watching this film, we can hardly imagine any similar behavior of the police and the government - the more reasons to watch this nice film.

Going By the Book is a comedy written (in part) by the talented Jang Jin and you can see his flourishes all over it, and while it's directed by another man, it has a lot of Jang's hallmarks in it. Unfortunately, like many of Jang's films, this one is pretty even and the story logic falls apart. What's more is that the premise and setups have great comic potential but I feel that it doesn't deliver on its potential.

The premise is awesome and made me buy the movie blind: A "by the book" straight-laced traffic cop pulls over and tickets the incoming chief of police on his inauguration day. Meanwhile, the small town that they live in is plagued by a string of bank robberies that the police are clueless on in how to respond and stop. Losing face, the new chief of police decides to save the force's face by doing a publicized "training" robbery, which will be simulated, but otherwise treated as real. And possibly as an act of vengeance, the police chief picks the traffic cop, Doman, to be the robber. Of course, what he didn't bargain for is that Doman is extremely dutiful and begins preparing the perfect robbery.

See? Can't you see the potential oozing out of that idea? I sure can.

But there's a big problem in its execution as well as the second half's story issues. First of all, the director (and possibly editor) doesn't seem to have a good grasp on comic timing and drawing out the comedy from Jang's very wry type of humor. Consequently, the delivery of some rather good jokes is unfortunately underplayed and failed to get even a laugh out of me. Worse, the logical glue of this simulation sometimes falls apart. While the story is partially pitted as two arrogant individuals, Doman and the chief of police, battle out this simulation, it's implied that Doman was a solid detective who lost his position for chasing after the governor and is assumed to be bright. Unfortunately, half of his successes seem to be out of pure luck, which undermines the tenseness of the battle. In the second half, the script tries to pull an Inside Man/Ocean's Eleven type switcharoo, but it's completely unbelievable due to the fact that the hostages have no reason to cooperate when they reach that point. Even if they were doing it out of sympathy for Doman, Doman never really earns this. A national media subplot also exists and it goes nowhere.

The film also engages in some flights of fancy, but I don't feel that they were well incorporated into the film and, as a result, often feel jarring to the otherwise realistic tone of the film. I feel like these parts needed to be introduced earlier to work, rather than a third into the film. Also, I often fail to understand what the point of the film is. It would have been far more interesting if Doman were more clever, especially to use the situation to get his old job back, but he's drawn too straightlaced for that. If he were more of a fool, perhaps it would've been interesting too, as everyone gets frustrated by the fool. Also, the ending seems too much of a cop out, trying to provide a sort of payoff that wasn't really earned and also circumstantial. Finally, the last scene is pretty ridiculous. I think if the "real robbers" were more incorporated in the script it would've helped add more dynamism to an often static situation.

In terms of lensing, framing, etc., the directing was fine and even features some good shots. The acting ranges from good (the protagonist/antagonist do fairly well) to wooden. Some of the supporting characters had a lot of opportunity to add more to the film, but really didn't pull off the comedy well. Perhaps they were directed to play everything more deadpan, but I think it would've worked better if the players played their parts a little more realistically. It also robs the last scene of any comedy as well. I don't remember the score, but I don't think it was intrusive or particularly notable.

What we end up with here is a film with a boatload of potential, most of which is wasted by a script that fails to get anywhere meaningful, probably due to a lack of focus, characteristic of Jang, and a rather underwhelming execution. I still love the premise, but I really can't recommend this film because it just doesn't work as well as it should. It's a bit of a disappointment. 5/10.

In an Ocean's-esque elaborate puzzle plot, an overly fastidious cop takes a fake robbery a little too far. The storytelling is brilliant, both in the script and the direction, calling out ever-prevalent bureaucratic corruption and police incompetency. It's a uniquely hilarious and engrossing take on the hostage-standoff genre that should be so much bigger than it is.