[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementsLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreEn tête du box-officeHoraire des présentations et billetsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À l'affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléSéries télé les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    À regarderDernières bandes-annoncesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteFamily Entertainment GuideBalados IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuidePrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

2:22

  • 2017
  • 14A
  • 1h 38m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,7/10
27 k
MA NOTE
Michiel Huisman and Teresa Palmer in 2:22 (2017)
Trailer for 2:22
Liretrailer2 min 29 s
2 vidéos
59 photos
Conspiracy ThrillerSuspense MysteryDramaMysteryRomanceSci-FiThriller

La vie d'un homme est déraillée quand une série d'événements inquiétants se répète exactement de la même manière tous les jours, se terminant précisément à 14 heures et 22 minutes.La vie d'un homme est déraillée quand une série d'événements inquiétants se répète exactement de la même manière tous les jours, se terminant précisément à 14 heures et 22 minutes.La vie d'un homme est déraillée quand une série d'événements inquiétants se répète exactement de la même manière tous les jours, se terminant précisément à 14 heures et 22 minutes.

  • Director
    • Paul Currie
  • Writers
    • Todd Stein
    • Nathan Parker
  • Stars
    • Michiel Huisman
    • Teresa Palmer
    • Sam Reid
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    5,7/10
    27 k
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • Paul Currie
    • Writers
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Stars
      • Michiel Huisman
      • Teresa Palmer
      • Sam Reid
    • 179Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 38Commentaires de critiques
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
    • Prix
      • 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos2

    2:22
    Trailer 2:29
    2:22
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer

    Photos59

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 52
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux60

    Modifier
    Michiel Huisman
    Michiel Huisman
    • Dylan Branson
    Teresa Palmer
    Teresa Palmer
    • Sarah Barton
    Sam Reid
    Sam Reid
    • Jonas Edman
    John Waters
    John Waters
    • Bill
    Kerry Armstrong
    Kerry Armstrong
    • Catherine Mills
    Richard Davies
    Richard Davies
    • Inky
    Maeve Dermody
    Maeve Dermody
    • Sandy
    Remy Hii
    Remy Hii
    • Benny
    Simone Kessell
    Simone Kessell
    • Serena
    Mitchell Butel
    Mitchell Butel
    • Howard Pace
    Barry Quin
    Barry Quin
    • Samuel Keifer
    Zara Michales
    Zara Michales
    • Ellie
    Nancy Denis
    • Regina Jones
    Duncan Ragg
    • Jake Redman
    Jessica Clarke
    • Evelyn Mills
    Jack Ellis
    Jack Ellis
    • Noah Marks
    Michael-Anthony Taylor
    • Ticket Booth Man
    Thuso Lekwape
    Thuso Lekwape
    • Waiter
    • Director
      • Paul Currie
    • Writers
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs179

    5,726.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    8peterfaure

    Entertaining, surreal movie

    I have to admit I don't understand the extreme negativity in some of the reviews.....especially considering the amount of uninspired garbage in movie theaters these days.

    Now, 2:22 is not a masterpiece, and like most movies it has weaknesses, but its strength is that it builds a sense of suspense without the usual car chases and urban shoot outs that seem to please the ADD crowds so much. The acting is solid (not Oscar material but better than hinted at in many reviews), the direction and special effects are very polished, and, more importantly, the slow accretion of mysterious details and surreal circumstances make it far more interesting, IMO, than most movies currently on offering. I think this movie also does a good job, overall, of hinting at parts of the ending but at the same time maintaining a sense of suspense about how exactly the mysterious events and patterns noticed by the main character will come together.

    This is not a realistic thriller, with a clear cut plot and an ending that explains every minor thread or detail in its story, or a relentless action movies with plenty of explosions and other events that ultimately mean nothing, or a bloated love story with SF elements. Hence, I think, the disappointment of some viewers.

    The way I see it this is a movie that, despite its imperfections, evolves into a subtle, psychological thriller that hints at man's endless fascination with patterns (in our Universe, in our life, in history etc) and at our sense of wonder of how we fit in it. A movie that while providing us with an interesting story also asks us to add to the plot our own interpretation of the events, and our own sense of wonder about the mystery of our existence.

    Now, there is no doubt that other movies on similar topics are superior (12 monkeys and Groundhog day come to mind, among others), but I still think this is one of the few movies worth watching I've seen this year, despite its limitations. At least it asks the watcher to actually engage his brain instead of just switching off and let the explosions roll on until the cardboard cutout bad guy/guys are vanquished.
    5Gentzen

    A waste of time even for light entertainment

    Soapy cheese fest that don't cohere. Could well have been the script of an 80s music videoclip. Despite the decent enough production value, it can in fact be described as 90 odd minutes of two nice-looking people who fall in love trying (in vain, as far as sound story-telling goes) to find cosmic significance in their feelings. They do so through a mary-go-round story that uses all the trappings of the "stuck in a moment in time" motif without any of the logical puzzles, metaphysical ponderings, or even plain suspense that a situation like that may create. Love proper may reverberate down the ages, but this love affair's photons get trapped in the movie's scripting black hole and never make it out. Utterly forgettable.

    5 points to production value but nothing more than this.
    4arthur_tafero

    Good Try; No Cigar - 2:22

    The star of this film are the screenwriters; Nathan and Stein, who take an incomplete idea and run with it. Unfortunately, when you rush, you sometimes make mistakes. This is one of those times. It is a real shame, and I am sure both writers will have a productive future. But this effort falls short due to the inability of the writers to clearly convey what they are writing about. The character of the air traffic controller is well-developed, but not anyone else. To get an effective chemistry for the audience, one must develop the TWO characters at the same time; not just one and then introduce another one much later. That device does not work, and helps to eventually ruin any connection the audience might have with the later character. This flaw is not the only reason the film is not successful. The premise of time travel (and this is a time travel film in the sense that Groundhog Day was a time travel film) is a difficult premise to work around as a film. Groundhog Day was successful because it had a great actor, Murray, and great comedy situations. This film has no sense of humor, nor does it have any sense of impending repeating events. The audience is intrigued, but then loses interest when there are no compelling examples before the final event of the phenomenon. A good try, but no cigar.
    8pat-394

    Enjoyable sci-fi thriller that doesn't pretend to be something it's not.

    Keeping this short, I don't understand why there's so many negative reviews of this flick. I see a repeating pattern for genre movies such as this, in that the sex & explosions popcorn actioner crowd seem to take it personally when they don't understand what's going on.

    Above average movies such as this and other hidden gems like "Predestination" get an unfair rap from the instant gratification legions, who seemingly don't like any pointed reminders that they're stupid.

    Good casting, locations, cinematography and a breathtaking soundtrack used to the best possible effect make this a welcome addition to the stable of movies that you wouldn't usually watch because of all the naysayers, but are glad you did once you do. Yeah, there's some minor plothole issues and the pacing was a bit confusing at times, but the good far outweighs the bad.

    Watch it.
    5solojere

    2/22/22

    So I saw this movie on HBO Max and thought it would be perfect to watch on 2/22/22. And honestly, it was kind of underwhelming. The film follows Dylan, who has something bad happen to him every day at precisely 2:22 p.m. As the film goes on, it becomes clear that these events are somehow tied into a larger event that happened at 2:22 in either the past or the future or maybe even both ;). Overall it wasn't a terrible film, but it was nothing great either. At times I was kind of bored, and I never really cared about the characters. It wasn't the worst movie in the world, though, and there was nothing terrible about it. Just nothing great either. But I'm glad I watched it on 2/22/22. Not sure if I would recommend it, though.

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    Tulen morsian
    6,0
    Tulen morsian
    Berlin Syndrome
    6,3
    Berlin Syndrome
    The Wheel
    6,0
    The Wheel
    D'amour et d'honneur
    5,7
    D'amour et d'honneur
    Éternelle Adaline
    7,2
    Éternelle Adaline
    Settlers
    4,8
    Settlers
    Zombie malgré lui
    6,8
    Zombie malgré lui
    Un choix
    6,5
    Un choix
    222
    222
    2:22
    7,2
    2:22
    Numéro quatre
    6,1
    Numéro quatre
    Le dernier jour de ma vie
    6,4
    Le dernier jour de ma vie

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      During its one week theatrical release from June 30 to July 6, it only made $422, making it the lowest grossing film of 2017.
    • Gaffes
      In the opening scenes of New York the Twin Towers are clearly visible. In a later scene of New York we see the One World Trade Center.

      The first scene is in the dream. At that time in the dream, the twin towers still stood.
    • Citations

      Dylan: In everyone's life there comes a time when the universe opens itself for just a few moments to show us what's truly possible.

    • Connexions
      References La jetée (1962)
    • Bandes originales
      Cool on Fire
      Performed by Daniel Johns

      Composed by Daniel Johns / Joel Little

      Licensed by Sony/ATV Music Publishing (Australia) Pty Limited & EMI April Music Inc. Licensed by EMI Music Publishing Australia Pty Limited

      Under license from Eleven: A Music Company Pty Ltd

      Licensed courtesy of Universal Music Australia Pty Limited

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ18

    • How long is 2:22?Propulsé par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 30 juin 2017 (United States)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Australia
      • United States
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • 2:22 - Thời Khắc Định Mệnh
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Disney Studios, Moore Park, Sydney, Nouvelle-Galles du Sud, Australie
    • sociétés de production
      • 2929 Productions
      • Entertainment One
      • Ingenious Media
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Brut – États-Unis et Canada
      • 422 $ US
    • Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
      • 294 $ US
      • 2 juill. 2017
    • Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
      • 3 945 729 $ US
    Voir les informations détaillées sur le box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 38 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • D-Cinema 48kHz 5.1
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Michiel Huisman and Teresa Palmer in 2:22 (2017)
    Lacune principale
    What is the French language plot outline for 2:22 (2017)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.