Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen a little girl is found after going missing, only her older brother recognizes the evil force that has returned in her place.When a little girl is found after going missing, only her older brother recognizes the evil force that has returned in her place.When a little girl is found after going missing, only her older brother recognizes the evil force that has returned in her place.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Matías De La Flor
- Jared
- (as Matias De La Flor)
Avis en vedette
As I sat down to watch the 2021 thriller "Where's Rose", I did so without ever having heard about the movie. I happened to stumble upon it by random chance, and of course with it being a movie that I hadn't already seen, of course I opted to give the movie a fair chance.
Writer and director John Mathis didn't manage to deliver a movie that fell particularly in my taste. The storyline and narrative of the movie was just simply too slow paced and uneventful. I didn't really care much for the characters in the movie, and then it becomes difficult to invest oneself into the narrative.
The storyline in "Where's Rose" was pretty straight forward, and I am sure that there is an audience out there for a slow burning movie such as this turned out to be. I, however, prefer movies with a bit more pacing to it. I found the narrative way too slow and uneventful, so there was very little enjoyment to be had here for me.
The acting performances in the movie were fair, however I just didn't care much for the one-dimensional characters that the actors and actresses had to portray.
As for "Where's Rose" being a thriller or horror movie, well... Let's just say you're not in for anything particularly thrilling or scary.
My rating of "Where's Rose" lands on a three out of ten stars.
Writer and director John Mathis didn't manage to deliver a movie that fell particularly in my taste. The storyline and narrative of the movie was just simply too slow paced and uneventful. I didn't really care much for the characters in the movie, and then it becomes difficult to invest oneself into the narrative.
The storyline in "Where's Rose" was pretty straight forward, and I am sure that there is an audience out there for a slow burning movie such as this turned out to be. I, however, prefer movies with a bit more pacing to it. I found the narrative way too slow and uneventful, so there was very little enjoyment to be had here for me.
The acting performances in the movie were fair, however I just didn't care much for the one-dimensional characters that the actors and actresses had to portray.
As for "Where's Rose" being a thriller or horror movie, well... Let's just say you're not in for anything particularly thrilling or scary.
My rating of "Where's Rose" lands on a three out of ten stars.
The people who know me personally or my taste & preferences in films are pretty much familiar with the fact that I often like to take my chances with low-budget independent works.
Why do I do that? Well, being an avid cinephile, I am always in search of deserving, underrated titles. At times, I do happen to stumble upon some worthy features, however, in most cases, I return empty-handed.
"Where's Rose", Unfortunately enlists itself to my latter list of disappointments.
Whilst I appreciate the story for at least trying to be innovative and bring something new (kinda) to the table; the execution, however, leaves a lot to be desired. The direction here is inefficient, the editing should have been more sharper, more articulative! The performances aren't exactly horrible, although I do feel, with a more experienced cast things could have panned out in a much better fashion.
A decent attempt nonetheless.
Why do I do that? Well, being an avid cinephile, I am always in search of deserving, underrated titles. At times, I do happen to stumble upon some worthy features, however, in most cases, I return empty-handed.
"Where's Rose", Unfortunately enlists itself to my latter list of disappointments.
Whilst I appreciate the story for at least trying to be innovative and bring something new (kinda) to the table; the execution, however, leaves a lot to be desired. The direction here is inefficient, the editing should have been more sharper, more articulative! The performances aren't exactly horrible, although I do feel, with a more experienced cast things could have panned out in a much better fashion.
A decent attempt nonetheless.
Thought I would give this a shot after seeing a trailer on Netflix. Super slow movie and as others have noted #1 the acting was fairly weak. I'm not sure how people didn't see the big twist coming after the 1st 30 min. I finished the film just to be sure but it was as I suspected.
Definitely a very low budget film that had promise but it's just too slow and uneventful to take serious.
The parents are horrible and probably the weakest actors in the film. The special effects are very subpar even for a low budget film.
I like indie films and respect filmmakers that have a vision and don't have big Hollywood money. However, in this case I wish I had passed on this one.
Definitely a very low budget film that had promise but it's just too slow and uneventful to take serious.
The parents are horrible and probably the weakest actors in the film. The special effects are very subpar even for a low budget film.
I like indie films and respect filmmakers that have a vision and don't have big Hollywood money. However, in this case I wish I had passed on this one.
Took me a while to get round to this purely because some of the reviews were very negative.
When I did eventually watch it, I was so glad I did.
It's a great little mystery horror. Despite a low budget, the cinematography is great, the acting is on-point (with a few forgivable exceptions) and the script is clever. Theres' a twist that is sign-posted throughout but never obviously enough that it ruins the ending. I had suspicions of what was going to happen but still found the final reveal rewarding.
There are several negative reviews on IMDB but, for the most part, these seem to miss the point. In particilar, a review titled "Doesn't make any sense" misses the point entirely. There's more than one way to interpret this film and there is a lot of scope to unpick the symbolism; that reviewer clearly just took the whole thing literally.
As I said in the title, if slowburn horror appeals to you, and you don't mind lower-budgey (but still very well made!) indie films, you could do a lot worse than this!
When I did eventually watch it, I was so glad I did.
It's a great little mystery horror. Despite a low budget, the cinematography is great, the acting is on-point (with a few forgivable exceptions) and the script is clever. Theres' a twist that is sign-posted throughout but never obviously enough that it ruins the ending. I had suspicions of what was going to happen but still found the final reveal rewarding.
There are several negative reviews on IMDB but, for the most part, these seem to miss the point. In particilar, a review titled "Doesn't make any sense" misses the point entirely. There's more than one way to interpret this film and there is a lot of scope to unpick the symbolism; that reviewer clearly just took the whole thing literally.
As I said in the title, if slowburn horror appeals to you, and you don't mind lower-budgey (but still very well made!) indie films, you could do a lot worse than this!
Not sure why the good reviews are getting bot down votes. The movie is low budget, but decent! I wavered in my thinking who the real monster was, and in the end, my gut was right.
Only by then I assumed the movie had gone in a very different direction. It might seem like the same old "Changeling" type of movie, but if you stick with it til the end you'll likely be surprised.
The acting is fine, nothing that stands out as either fantastic or awful.
I don't want to spoil the plot so I'll end here, hopefully within the new required character minimum needed for reviewing. There's not much else to say, aside from the fact there are no real jump scares nor stomach turning effects.
Only by then I assumed the movie had gone in a very different direction. It might seem like the same old "Changeling" type of movie, but if you stick with it til the end you'll likely be surprised.
The acting is fine, nothing that stands out as either fantastic or awful.
I don't want to spoil the plot so I'll end here, hopefully within the new required character minimum needed for reviewing. There's not much else to say, aside from the fact there are no real jump scares nor stomach turning effects.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn the football scene at the beginning of the film, producer Justin Boswick acts as the stunt double for every tackle.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: 2023 Catch-up (Part 1) (2023)
- Bandes originalesHello
written by Luke Gawne, Antun Vuic
performed by Luke Gawne
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Where's Rose?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 21 720 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant