ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,1/10
120 k
MA NOTE
Après la mort de ses parents pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, le jeune Hannibal Lecter s'installe avec sa belle tante et commence à se venger des barbares responsables de la mort de sa so... Tout lireAprès la mort de ses parents pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, le jeune Hannibal Lecter s'installe avec sa belle tante et commence à se venger des barbares responsables de la mort de sa soeur.Après la mort de ses parents pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, le jeune Hannibal Lecter s'installe avec sa belle tante et commence à se venger des barbares responsables de la mort de sa soeur.
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Michelle Wade
- Nanny
- (as Michele Wade)
Avis en vedette
I don't put this in the same category
as the 3 previous films with Hopkins
(counting Manhunter out completely,,
even though it is a very good film). This movie is another animal altogether. Not
only bc this has a young actor playing a young Lecter,, but bc this is the origin story,, how he became the monster. This movie shows so many new sides to the character. A helpless child,, a traumatized teen,, a deranged young man trying to put his memories together to exact his revenge,,, and also, love. His love for the sister he lost, and also his widowed aunt.
If you are a fan of the Hopkins trilogy,, then you must see this,,,
If you are a fan of the Hopkins trilogy,, then you must see this,,,
I've heard a lot of reviews saying this was a bad movie. I disagree! I don't know if any of these people have read any of the books, let alone Hannibal Rising, but I loved the movie. Given, it seemed like Thomas Harris wrote the book strictly for the movie, but I felt this movie was made to have people understand how Lecter, "the monster" was created.
Yes, Lecter is irrational and that's the point. Hannibal Lecter is suppose to be distant because he's a psychopath. He's suppose to be apathetic. Some people mistook that for bad acting.
Comparing the movie to the book...they were about 85% compatible. Minor changes were made, but nothing too critical.
I think some people are quick to make this movie out to be horrible because they really are milking the Hannibal Lecter story, but I felt it to be a decent movie.
Yes, Lecter is irrational and that's the point. Hannibal Lecter is suppose to be distant because he's a psychopath. He's suppose to be apathetic. Some people mistook that for bad acting.
Comparing the movie to the book...they were about 85% compatible. Minor changes were made, but nothing too critical.
I think some people are quick to make this movie out to be horrible because they really are milking the Hannibal Lecter story, but I felt it to be a decent movie.
Truly disturbing and succeeds in making you understand why Hannibal Lecter turned out to be the person he became. Not justified, but understandable. Don't leave this out when revisiting the other movies.
Strange opus with a rather complex feedback: I really like certain aspects of the film while others bother me. First of all, I think it's a critical mistake to explain the origins of an imaginary evil character. Indeed, it's always better to confine a reader or a spectator to the darkness so that he's always able to imagine the worst. Moreover, in doing so, we find ourselves in a rather embarrassing situation of being in empathy with Hannibal Lecter: failing to be forgivable, a revenge is always understandable. Despite this rather negative introduction, the actors are excellent including the enigmatic Gaspard Ulliel and the gorgeous Gong Li, and the film enjoys a particularly neat photography.
Like come on, sure it's not silence of the lambs, but nominated for worst sequel/horror movie, that's just dumb. Snobby reviewers who can't judge a movie on its own merits, only a comparison to one of the greatest thrillers ever made. Of course any other Hannibal stories won't compare, doesn't mean they are aweful. This is an interesting tale of revenge that setups the character. Worth the watch if you enjoy the Hannibal movies.
Le saviez-vous
- Anecdotes"Lady Murasaki" (Shikibu Murasaki) is actually the name of an 11th-century Japanese novelist. Her "The Tale of the Genji" is regarded as a masterpiece of Japanese literature. In the book on which this film is based, Lady Murasaki is indeed a descendant of the 11th-century novelist. She and Hannibal even quote "The Tale of the Genji".
- GaffesWorld War II German "dogtags" didn't have the name of the soldier on them. Instead they listed the unit that they were in when the tag was issued, and a serial number.
- Citations
Hannibal Lecter: Rudeness is an epidemic.
- Autres versionsFor the German retail market a cut version was created (based on the theatrical version) which misses ca. 13 minutes. This version is rated "Not under 16". Theatrical and US-Unrated version are also available with a "Not under 18" rating but have some sales restrictions.
- ConnexionsFeatured in HypaSpace: Episode #6.25 (2007)
- Bandes originalesPesnya o Staline
Written by Aleksandr Aleksandrov (as A. Alexandrov) and Sergey Alymov (as S. Alymov)
Public Domain
(misspelled as "Pensya o Staline")
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Hannibal Rising
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 75 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 27 670 986 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 13 051 650 $ US
- 11 févr. 2007
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 82 169 884 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 1m(121 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant