[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Beauty and the Beast

  • 2005
  • 14A
  • 1h 30m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,1/10
736
MA NOTE
Jane March and Justin Whalin in Beauty and the Beast (2005)
Home Video Trailer from Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Liretrailer1 min 14 s
1 vidéo
34 photos
Romantic EpicActionAdventureFamilyFantasyRomance

Jane March (L'Amant), William Gregory Lee (Dark Angel) et Justin Whalin (Donjons et Dragons) plongent au coeur des légendes vikings.Jane March (L'Amant), William Gregory Lee (Dark Angel) et Justin Whalin (Donjons et Dragons) plongent au coeur des légendes vikings.Jane March (L'Amant), William Gregory Lee (Dark Angel) et Justin Whalin (Donjons et Dragons) plongent au coeur des légendes vikings.

  • Director
    • David Lister
  • Writer
    • Paul Anthony
  • Stars
    • Jane March
    • Justin Whalin
    • William Gregory Lee
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    4,1/10
    736
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • David Lister
    • Writer
      • Paul Anthony
    • Stars
      • Jane March
      • Justin Whalin
      • William Gregory Lee
    • 16Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 9Commentaires de critiques
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Vidéos1

    Blood of Beasts
    Trailer 1:14
    Blood of Beasts

    Photos34

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 29
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux15

    Modifier
    Jane March
    Jane March
    • Freya
    Justin Whalin
    Justin Whalin
    • Eric
    William Gregory Lee
    William Gregory Lee
    • Sven
    David Dukas
    David Dukas
    • Beast…
    Greg Melvill-Smith
    • Thorsson
    Candice Hillebrand
    Candice Hillebrand
    • Ingrid
    Marcel van Heerden
    • Kogla
    Russel Savadier
    Russel Savadier
    • Olaf
    Steven van Niekerk
    • Heindall
    • (as Stephen Van Niekerk)
    Lee Ann Shepherd
    • Alfhild
    Ron Smerczak
    Ron Smerczak
    • Ragnar
    Aubrey Lovett
    • Raine
    Etienne Oelofse
    • Gang
    Etienne Changuion
    • Jarl
    Antony Jardin
    • Algar
    • Director
      • David Lister
    • Writer
      • Paul Anthony
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs16

    4,1736
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    3Cynicialwonder

    A Barbie Hollywood retailing of Beauty and the Beast with Vikings.

    I happened upon this rare piece of cinematic art whilst looking for Batman Begins at Blockbuster. Batman was out and this was there. Which was unfortunate. From the opening scene where viking teenagers are swimming and we see that apparently the producers forgot ITS COLD in Norse lands. Also every one is young and pretty. It felt very much like watching an episode of Xena. I mean lets be honest this is a straight to video release for a reason. The acting is very bad. Of course the material wasn't any help at all. I will say that the production design team did a very good job. I am sure this was a very low budget film but they did a good job. The story line works to a certain degree. I mean it is beauty and the Beast retold. If your looking for Vicking movies I would stick with the 13th Warrior.
    3kendallphoenix

    Odin has Cursed us with Chain Mail and Bad Wigs

    Okay...truthfully, I knew this movie would not be a cinematic masterpiece. I knew it would be some low-budget, straight-to-video Lord of the Rings knock off. It was low-budget and it was straight-to-video. However, it wasn't a LOTR knockoff...which is unfortunate. The story was Beauty and the Beast all over again...only it was set it the days of the Vikings. This is a problem because the characters didn't act like Vikings, nor did they dress like Vikings. For God's sake they wear all wearing chain mail...CHAIN MAIL!!! Vikings were only a couple of centuries BEFORE chain mail. If this story had taken place on an imaginary world with imaginary tribes and people and such, it would have been much better. However, setting it in Viking era did nothing but fill the movie with historical inaccuracies.

    Inaccuracies aside, let's talk hair. Most of the actor were wearing wigs and it was obvious. There was one in particular...I remember him vividly. He was only in the movie for a couple of seconds. You say him in the background on the boat. He had no lines and no name that was mentioned. He was obviously just an extra. His job was to just blend in. Unfortunately, he didn't. Why?? Because he was wearing this ridiculous 1980's Britney Fox wig. This thing was WAY too big for the actor's head. It was just so terrible. All of the actors had bad wigs, but this one was the worst. Also, William Gregory Lee had hair extensions, but, apparently, the budget wasn't big enough for him to get a full head of them, so the producers just gave him a few. You could see where they were attached to his head and...it was awful. Also, what the heck was up with that little twig over his forehead. That thing got on my nerves.

    The acting was, by no means, great. It was like watching a high school play or an after school special (for those of you old enough to actually remember after school specials). Anything with Justin Whalin is destined to be crap...let me present Exhibit A: Dungeons & Dragons, Child's Play 3, Lois and Clark...you get the idea. However, he wasn't the worst actor...in fact, he did well. William Gregory Lee got on my nerves. Obviously, he wasn't really all that tough, because he seemed to be having trouble acting tough. Jane March was okay, but not great. David Dukas, who played the Beast/Agnar, was probably the best, but only whilst playing the Beast. He struggled through the three minutes that he played Agnar. Very strange. The other actors were nothing short of mildly mediocre.

    The SFX in this movie were...well...almost completely absent. The Beast was a guy in a prosthetic suit. And though it was a pretty cool idea, it really just looked like a guy in a bear skin rug. Also, the fires never looked real. Apparently, it was cheaper to make fake fire rather than actually set stuff on fire for real. The flames looked like those TV fireplace things and the smoke...well...there are no words to describe how bad the smoke looked. In the film's defense, though, this was a low-budget movie. That is something that must be taken into consideration. The weapons were obviously fake. They looked like wooden weapons that were spray-painted to look like metal only the producers hired some one-eyed imbreed from a Mississippi body shop to paint them.

    In the end. This film was low-budget and watching it gave constant reminders of this fact. However, the low budget wasn't the real problem. The real problem was that the producers tried to pass it off as a Viking tale. They should have just gone ahead and made it a cheap knock-off of LOTR. It would have actually been a better film. 3/10.
    4isitabee

    Horrid wigs everywhere!

    We rented this movie for fun, and what a blast it was! The cover looks like Lord of the Rings, which is why it was rented. The acting was alright, some were worse than others. But that's to be expected in a movie like this. The sets were good, for the budget they were on. Costumes were not completely historically accurate, but they were alright. Sven's fringe braid thing was fugly, and I wanted to cut it off. The wigs though...the best damn thing in this movie. Who designed them I don't know, but damn, they were hideous. Fugly, fugly, fugly! Overall it's an okay movie, um maybe play a drinking game while you're watching so that it seems better than it really is? Though if you have a rule where you take a drink every time a bad wig is on the screen, you may die.
    purpleducktwo

    Sorry everyone, I liked it.

    Once again I feel like odd man out, i read all the comments and wonder at all the would-be movie critics, with all the harsh comments, I cant help but wonder why there are not more people before the cameras for all their seeming knowledge of the acting profession and directors abilities. For myself, once again I just enjoyed the movie for its entertainment factor, and Jane March is still one of my favorites, my only disappointment was her death near the end, but thats just me, all I can say is to those who had such harsh feelings toward s the movie, why did you watch it all the way thru, then waste your time vomiting your comments in these columns? If you don't like a movie don't watch it, May I always enjoy what I watch and watch what I enjoy, tincancpo.....
    6harbeau

    Not as bad as it first appears.

    This movie is not great, by any stretch. It is the story of Beauty and the Beast retold from a vaguely new perspective.

    Having said that, its not as bad as it first appears. Sure, the costumes suck...it is obvious that this is a film with a very low budget.

    But the acting is decent, and there were even a few that stood out. The writing is decent. And the directing was obviously quite good. He/she did quite a bit with very little money spent. Even the production was decent. Not spectacular, by any means. But certainly could have been worse.

    So, does it top my A list? Not a chance. But if you are looking for a movie that is a pleasant diversion, this may be the ticket.

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    Tarzan et la cité perdue
    4,0
    Tarzan et la cité perdue
    Beauty and the Beast
    5,8
    Beauty and the Beast
    Will
    6,8
    Will
    Beauty and the Beast
    6,4
    Beauty and the Beast
    Beauty and the Beast
    4,7
    Beauty and the Beast
    Beauty and the Beast
    6,8
    Beauty and the Beast
    Perfect Harmony
    7,3
    Perfect Harmony
    Super Capers: The Origins of Ed and the Missing Bullion
    3,2
    Super Capers: The Origins of Ed and the Missing Bullion
    Le monde magique de Belle
    4,8
    Le monde magique de Belle
    Susie Q
    7,1
    Susie Q
    La Belle et la Bête. Un Noël enchanté
    5,9
    La Belle et la Bête. Un Noël enchanté
    La Belle et la Bête
    6,4
    La Belle et la Bête

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      David Lister directed both Beauty and the Beast (2005) & Beauty and the Beast (2010), with the former also known as both Blood of Beasts & Blood of Vikings.
    • Gaffes
      When the beast is shown hanging by his neck supposedly dead his lair is torched and his body is showed burning. But later when he comes back to life he is unscathed.
    • Citations

      Freya: But you still live!

      Sven: Yes, and so do the others and so will our people because they know not to meddle in the affairs of the gods. If Odin wants the cursed island, then let him have it!

      Freya: Coward!

    • Connexions
      Referenced in Brows Held High: Beauty and the Beast: Part 3 (2014)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ14

    • How long is Blood of Beasts?Propulsé par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 26 juillet 2005 (Russia)
    • Pays d’origine
      • South Africa
      • United Kingdom
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Blood of Beasts
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Rietvlei Dam, Irene, Afrique du Sud
    • sociétés de production
      • Crimson Knight
      • Peakviewing Transatlantic PLC
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 30 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Jane March and Justin Whalin in Beauty and the Beast (2005)
    Lacune principale
    What is the English language plot outline for Beauty and the Beast (2005)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.