ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,3/10
1,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueOdessa and Kyle James were just your average American boys until the night they went upstairs and killed their parents in cold blood... and smiled.Odessa and Kyle James were just your average American boys until the night they went upstairs and killed their parents in cold blood... and smiled.Odessa and Kyle James were just your average American boys until the night they went upstairs and killed their parents in cold blood... and smiled.
Burke Morgan
- Charles Ryan
- (as C.T. Miller)
Joseph E. Jones-Marino
- Patrolman
- (as Joseph Jones-Marino)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesNanette Bianchi's first of only two roles in her career.
- GaffesThe family are playing charades. The child indicates a movie, with three syllables, and does her mime. The mother guesses "The Naked Gun", which has four syllables.
- Générique farfeluDedicated to the memory of Bonnie Parker, 1910-1934
- Autres versionsThere was an alternate soundtrack over the opening scene which only aired at the 1997 Sundance Film festival
- ConnexionsReferenced in Houses of the Unholy (2023)
- Bandes originalesIn-A-Gadda-Da-Vida
Commentaire en vedette
This is a great example of a movie that has a lot more buried in it than what you see on it's cover. Depending on your inclinations, you'll either love it or hate it when it's twisty-turny bits start to do their thing.
There are some reviews claiming that the acting is very poor. Honestly, they are not far off. The acting is slow, and so is the development. The lines are overly written, portraying a little too much imagination in long-winded passages that are almost poetic in nature. Still, I would say that the lines are delivered with as much sense and effectiveness as the actors could have mustered up. Watch it and ask yourself, "How would I have delivered that line?" and I suspect you will find yourself beginning to agree with the simple candor that the actors used on screen.
Also, in the case of the main protagonists, you start to realize that the excessively verbose mannerisms actually make a certain sense, and even become relevant later on as the characters begin to reveal their more interesting secrets. While the characters seem unreal at first, you start to see why they are the way they are later.
The film's biggest drawbacks are it's poor filming, slow movement, and it's highly unlikely circumstantial timing. What I mean by the timing is that events happen that leave you scratching your head and asking yourself, "Why, when and how did this happen?" The director feels no need to answer these questions, as the film's magic is contained almost entirely in the house where the events occur. The writers felt no need to explain why the world outside kept intruding.
Lastly, the filming is all blue and moody. It's a silly method of filming, I never liked it. Stop using the filters, bring in some dang light and make a movie we can see.
I really feel like I did NOT waste my time on this one. I don't know if I can call it original in any way other than it's incredible and unusual mix of themes, but it was definitely entertaining.
And that's really the point. Entertainment. It's the bottom line of movie making. I recommend this movie, simply because it's so.. bizarre.
I really feel like this is something of a hidden gem. It deserves a redo, a more modern reiteration to work out the bugs.
There are some reviews claiming that the acting is very poor. Honestly, they are not far off. The acting is slow, and so is the development. The lines are overly written, portraying a little too much imagination in long-winded passages that are almost poetic in nature. Still, I would say that the lines are delivered with as much sense and effectiveness as the actors could have mustered up. Watch it and ask yourself, "How would I have delivered that line?" and I suspect you will find yourself beginning to agree with the simple candor that the actors used on screen.
Also, in the case of the main protagonists, you start to realize that the excessively verbose mannerisms actually make a certain sense, and even become relevant later on as the characters begin to reveal their more interesting secrets. While the characters seem unreal at first, you start to see why they are the way they are later.
The film's biggest drawbacks are it's poor filming, slow movement, and it's highly unlikely circumstantial timing. What I mean by the timing is that events happen that leave you scratching your head and asking yourself, "Why, when and how did this happen?" The director feels no need to answer these questions, as the film's magic is contained almost entirely in the house where the events occur. The writers felt no need to explain why the world outside kept intruding.
Lastly, the filming is all blue and moody. It's a silly method of filming, I never liked it. Stop using the filters, bring in some dang light and make a movie we can see.
I really feel like I did NOT waste my time on this one. I don't know if I can call it original in any way other than it's incredible and unusual mix of themes, but it was definitely entertaining.
And that's really the point. Entertainment. It's the bottom line of movie making. I recommend this movie, simply because it's so.. bizarre.
I really feel like this is something of a hidden gem. It deserves a redo, a more modern reiteration to work out the bugs.
- rushknight
- 28 nov. 2014
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Real Killers
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 100 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant