ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,3/10
425
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueSharon Bell is back, this time she must stop a terrorist plot to smuggle Nazi nerve gas.Sharon Bell is back, this time she must stop a terrorist plot to smuggle Nazi nerve gas.Sharon Bell is back, this time she must stop a terrorist plot to smuggle Nazi nerve gas.
Tommy Chang
- Kidnapper
- (as Thomas Chang)
Avis en vedette
In FACE THE EVIL (aka: NO CONTEST II), Shannon Tweed returns as Sharon Bell. This time, she's visiting her sister's art gallery. All is lovely until a group of homicidal criminals arrive to poop on everyone's party. Sharon must battle these terrorists along with their loathsome leader, Dane (Lance Henriksen).
Ms. Tweed must shift from uber-hot socialite, into uber-hot commando mode, while Mr. Henriksen grimaces and acts in eeevil ways. They're both great, raising the material above the typical DIE HARD clones.
Fear not! There's plenty of gunfire, explosions, and karate throughout, and the gushy finale is classic stuff indeed...
Ms. Tweed must shift from uber-hot socialite, into uber-hot commando mode, while Mr. Henriksen grimaces and acts in eeevil ways. They're both great, raising the material above the typical DIE HARD clones.
Fear not! There's plenty of gunfire, explosions, and karate throughout, and the gushy finale is classic stuff indeed...
This got to be on of the worst movies ever. The plot was terrible, the action scenes boring and the whole thing totally crap. Good action films makes you forget that some things are unrealistic, like having 100 bullets in a gun. This movie is not like that at all. Here it just seems silly. And the ending is crap as well.
The only good thing is Lance Hendriksen who can actually act, otherwise do not waste your time on this movie.
The only good thing is Lance Hendriksen who can actually act, otherwise do not waste your time on this movie.
You get for what you pay, and l paid £1 for this in London, it`s not the best film l`ve ever seen but it certainly isn't the worse...
It's nice to see Bruce Payne as a `goodie` for once, Lance Hendrikson did a competent job and Sharron Tweed was ok, the story line..well we have seen it all before but what do you want..it`s a cheap film..and it passed time on while l was doing something else, thats how l like to see films...
It was ok, the story was l thought strong one...well written...pity all the acting did not match it..
But as l say you get what you pay for...
6/10
It's nice to see Bruce Payne as a `goodie` for once, Lance Hendrikson did a competent job and Sharron Tweed was ok, the story line..well we have seen it all before but what do you want..it`s a cheap film..and it passed time on while l was doing something else, thats how l like to see films...
It was ok, the story was l thought strong one...well written...pity all the acting did not match it..
But as l say you get what you pay for...
6/10
The first 'No Contest' had a bunch of recognizable faces, a decent budget and a simple charm. This action sequel sorely does not. Shannon Tweed returns as Sharon Bell and after the events of the first film has parlayed her success into an acting career.
She and a few crew members of her latest film find themselves at a museum near closing where Sharon's sister works. Scouting it as a potential filming location. Who else happens to be there? Lance Henriksen as the well known art collector Eric Dane. This flicks pretty obvious bad guy. I don't think I have to spell out the rest, but it turns out he's not who he seems, they're trapped inside and there's a biological weapon involved.
The story is weak and makes little sense if you think about it. Lance is one of my favorite actors and he can easily do bad guys justice but this script ain't it. While Tweed pulled off the action heroine the first time out, it's nowhere near as believable or exciting to see her do it the second time. The meager subplot with her sister is paper thin too.
Stuck in the "museum" for 95% of the time, everything feels cheap and rushed. Borderline boring. Definitely lower budget than the original. What little action there is doesn't satisfy and Bruce Payne (memorable as the villain of the Wesley Snipes flick 'Passenger 57') shows up in a wasted appearance.
In other circumstances, I would have tuned into a flick like this just for Henriksen. I actually turned out to be both surprised and entertained by the original 'No Contest'. Which made this piece a letdown in more ways than one.
She and a few crew members of her latest film find themselves at a museum near closing where Sharon's sister works. Scouting it as a potential filming location. Who else happens to be there? Lance Henriksen as the well known art collector Eric Dane. This flicks pretty obvious bad guy. I don't think I have to spell out the rest, but it turns out he's not who he seems, they're trapped inside and there's a biological weapon involved.
The story is weak and makes little sense if you think about it. Lance is one of my favorite actors and he can easily do bad guys justice but this script ain't it. While Tweed pulled off the action heroine the first time out, it's nowhere near as believable or exciting to see her do it the second time. The meager subplot with her sister is paper thin too.
Stuck in the "museum" for 95% of the time, everything feels cheap and rushed. Borderline boring. Definitely lower budget than the original. What little action there is doesn't satisfy and Bruce Payne (memorable as the villain of the Wesley Snipes flick 'Passenger 57') shows up in a wasted appearance.
In other circumstances, I would have tuned into a flick like this just for Henriksen. I actually turned out to be both surprised and entertained by the original 'No Contest'. Which made this piece a letdown in more ways than one.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesReleased theatrically in Japan.
- GaffesWhen Eric Dane goes to shoot Steven Ivory in the leg, he first pulls the trigger but the gun doesn't fire. On the second attempt, it works.
- Citations
Jack Terry: [taking to Eric via a walkie talkie] Dengler?
Eric Dane: Yeah?
Jack Terry: Clearly you have a problem with your identity. Let me give you a tip. In the roulette of life, I'm Vegas.
Eric Dane: You're Vegas? Well, I'm the Jackpot! Jackpot!
- ConnexionsFollows Otage en péril (1995)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Otages en péril II: Sans issue (1996) officially released in India in English?
Répondre