Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe effects of a nuclear holocaust on the working class city of Sheffield, England and the eventual long-term effects of nuclear war on civilization.The effects of a nuclear holocaust on the working class city of Sheffield, England and the eventual long-term effects of nuclear war on civilization.The effects of a nuclear holocaust on the working class city of Sheffield, England and the eventual long-term effects of nuclear war on civilization.
- A remporté le prix 4 BAFTA Awards
- 4 victoires et 4 nominations au total
David Brierly
- Mr. Kemp
- (as David Brierley)
Avis en vedette
I think it would be useless to repeat all that the other users have said about "Threads" since I cannot do better but agree with everything. This has to be THE most graphic representation of nuclear war. And I used to think "The Day After" was disturbing.
I was able to cope to the whole movie, but let's say it wasn't easy at all. I can still hear in my head the yells of the panicked citizens as the mushroom cloud rises in the distance when it hits Crewe... or see the bottles of milk... or the corpse (which bears a striking resemblance with E.T.!) burning in the firestorm... or see survivors keeping as gold what is taken nowadays as granted: supermarket plastic bags... and what they put inside is simply disgusting.
When I found out my local video store had a copy of this film, I rushed to get it, as I was impatient to see this movie I have heard so much about. The impatience to see the movie was rewarded by nothing more than a really bad aftertaste of radioactive fallout.
I liked the movie not for the quality of the actors, but for the overall realistic representation of the holocaust and for the great job done with a small budget. I give a thumbs up to that.
I was able to cope to the whole movie, but let's say it wasn't easy at all. I can still hear in my head the yells of the panicked citizens as the mushroom cloud rises in the distance when it hits Crewe... or see the bottles of milk... or the corpse (which bears a striking resemblance with E.T.!) burning in the firestorm... or see survivors keeping as gold what is taken nowadays as granted: supermarket plastic bags... and what they put inside is simply disgusting.
When I found out my local video store had a copy of this film, I rushed to get it, as I was impatient to see this movie I have heard so much about. The impatience to see the movie was rewarded by nothing more than a really bad aftertaste of radioactive fallout.
I liked the movie not for the quality of the actors, but for the overall realistic representation of the holocaust and for the great job done with a small budget. I give a thumbs up to that.
I first saw "Threads" in high school, and saw it again recently as a grown adult. It does make a measure how old you are when viewing this movie; you take the actions on screen more seriously.
"Threads" plays like BBC documentary about a catastrophic nuclear war, interjecting live scenes with a bland monologue and various statistics, although one wonders what audience would be viewing this documentary.
Since it does play like a documentary, it feels no need to either overplay events or sugarcoat things for our sensibilities. There's no speeches or heroic actions, everything occurs as it happens, no matter how horrifying.
The gore is moderate (it was a TV movie after all) but is unsettling because it's taken to be real. Throughout you look for some hopeful thought to intrude, even comic relief, but "Threads" stares you down, making you watch the horror and woe to the bitter end. There is no hope or salvation, only despair.
It's worth seeing a movie like this as a reminder of the horrors of nuclear war; the threat of a mututal destruction by superpowers seems to be fast fading, but there's always the possibility of terrorists or new enemies.
"Threads" is to nuclear war what "Saving Private Ryan" is to war movies, a landmark film that delivers a strong political message without ever really mentioning it.
"Threads" plays like BBC documentary about a catastrophic nuclear war, interjecting live scenes with a bland monologue and various statistics, although one wonders what audience would be viewing this documentary.
Since it does play like a documentary, it feels no need to either overplay events or sugarcoat things for our sensibilities. There's no speeches or heroic actions, everything occurs as it happens, no matter how horrifying.
The gore is moderate (it was a TV movie after all) but is unsettling because it's taken to be real. Throughout you look for some hopeful thought to intrude, even comic relief, but "Threads" stares you down, making you watch the horror and woe to the bitter end. There is no hope or salvation, only despair.
It's worth seeing a movie like this as a reminder of the horrors of nuclear war; the threat of a mututal destruction by superpowers seems to be fast fading, but there's always the possibility of terrorists or new enemies.
"Threads" is to nuclear war what "Saving Private Ryan" is to war movies, a landmark film that delivers a strong political message without ever really mentioning it.
The 80's were a different time. Everybody was making money, everybody was having a great time, things never looked better. Except there was always the threat of nuclear war hanging above our heads. This was more than just an idea. We felt it. It was always there just at the edges of your awareness and you could never really ignore it.
Enter "The Day After" which was an American made for TV movie showing what would happen. It was scary and it was effective but it showed an undercurrent of hope. That even in such a tragedy we could survive, pull together and win. Threads has no such message. It shows that even in a limited strike we are well and truly boned. No hope. No chance of a better world. The lucky ones would be the ones that died in the initial blast or that died shortly afterwards. The unlucky ones are the ones that would go on living and slowly get sick before dying.
This movie gave a detailed version of what would happen. From the initial blast to the radiation sickness to the lack of any kind of support or infrastructure afterwards. The worst part showing the long term effects of it. The birth defects, the lack of medicine and aid, the fact that suddenly food and clean water, things we take for granted becoming the most precious resources around.
This movie is a punch to the gut followed by a slow but deliberate beating until you are left spent on the ground quivering in fear. This needs to be required viewing by anybody in the East or West that might even consider that a nuclear strike is a good idea.
It's not. It would literally mean the end of life as we know it.
Enter "The Day After" which was an American made for TV movie showing what would happen. It was scary and it was effective but it showed an undercurrent of hope. That even in such a tragedy we could survive, pull together and win. Threads has no such message. It shows that even in a limited strike we are well and truly boned. No hope. No chance of a better world. The lucky ones would be the ones that died in the initial blast or that died shortly afterwards. The unlucky ones are the ones that would go on living and slowly get sick before dying.
This movie gave a detailed version of what would happen. From the initial blast to the radiation sickness to the lack of any kind of support or infrastructure afterwards. The worst part showing the long term effects of it. The birth defects, the lack of medicine and aid, the fact that suddenly food and clean water, things we take for granted becoming the most precious resources around.
This movie is a punch to the gut followed by a slow but deliberate beating until you are left spent on the ground quivering in fear. This needs to be required viewing by anybody in the East or West that might even consider that a nuclear strike is a good idea.
It's not. It would literally mean the end of life as we know it.
This is easily the best TV movie I've ever seen, and honestly, it might just be one of the best movies full stop I've ever seen.
It's hard to imagine the premise of a country falling apart after a nuclear attack being executed more effectively than this. The reduced budget works to the film's favour, as many of the settings look very real, the acting is naturalistic, and the blend of stock footage with limited special effects is far more convincing and genuine-feeling than high budget 80s, 90s, or even 2000s effects could produce.
There's nothing Hollywood, here. There's a sense of unflinching brutality and honesty that makes the already terrifying premise that much more devastating.
You might think the film's age and TV movie nature would make the disturbing content more manageable and less real, but that doesn't happen at all. The acting is almost 100% raw and believable. The effects never look cheesy. The violence and horrific imagery isn't at all toned down. It's remarkable and horrifying in equal measure.
Threads is without a doubt one of the bleakest and most distressing films I've ever seen, but two hours flew past, and I couldn't take my eyes off the screen. There was no part of me that wanted to scroll through Facebook or multitask with some household chores while watching this. I was glued to the screen.
The most effective moment is when the sound goes out for a moment or two during the sequence where the bombs are being dropped. Also worth noting is that shot with the lady staring into the camera, which will haunt me, and the manner in which the last half hour or so is done with almost no dialogue, and for good reason. It's mesmerising.
The voiceover and documentary-ish presentation could make this cheesy, but they don't. It adds to the believability, and such techniques weren't overused at all.
Nuclear weapons don't discriminate against their victims in the same way this movie doesn't discriminate against its characters. You could be rich, poor, a child, or even a cute household pet- it doesn't matter. This movie isn't afraid to show the deaths of anyone, and even more chilling is the way some main characters just disappear after the bombs fall, with the audience being left almost certain that whatever happened, their fates were not positive.
I can't say enough good things about this, and I am shocked by just how effective it was. A must watch, although be prepared to feel pretty rotten afterwards...
It's hard to imagine the premise of a country falling apart after a nuclear attack being executed more effectively than this. The reduced budget works to the film's favour, as many of the settings look very real, the acting is naturalistic, and the blend of stock footage with limited special effects is far more convincing and genuine-feeling than high budget 80s, 90s, or even 2000s effects could produce.
There's nothing Hollywood, here. There's a sense of unflinching brutality and honesty that makes the already terrifying premise that much more devastating.
You might think the film's age and TV movie nature would make the disturbing content more manageable and less real, but that doesn't happen at all. The acting is almost 100% raw and believable. The effects never look cheesy. The violence and horrific imagery isn't at all toned down. It's remarkable and horrifying in equal measure.
Threads is without a doubt one of the bleakest and most distressing films I've ever seen, but two hours flew past, and I couldn't take my eyes off the screen. There was no part of me that wanted to scroll through Facebook or multitask with some household chores while watching this. I was glued to the screen.
The most effective moment is when the sound goes out for a moment or two during the sequence where the bombs are being dropped. Also worth noting is that shot with the lady staring into the camera, which will haunt me, and the manner in which the last half hour or so is done with almost no dialogue, and for good reason. It's mesmerising.
The voiceover and documentary-ish presentation could make this cheesy, but they don't. It adds to the believability, and such techniques weren't overused at all.
Nuclear weapons don't discriminate against their victims in the same way this movie doesn't discriminate against its characters. You could be rich, poor, a child, or even a cute household pet- it doesn't matter. This movie isn't afraid to show the deaths of anyone, and even more chilling is the way some main characters just disappear after the bombs fall, with the audience being left almost certain that whatever happened, their fates were not positive.
I can't say enough good things about this, and I am shocked by just how effective it was. A must watch, although be prepared to feel pretty rotten afterwards...
This is perhaps one of the most masochistic films ever made. You are taken into the personal world of two British families in Sheffield (site of a major NATO installation), who have children that are about to be married. Thousands of miles away, World War 3 slowly starts, and the ultimate horror happens. Thermonuclear war breaks out. The world, literally, grinds to a halt, in one of the most scientifically accurate depictions of nuclear war since "War Game, The" (1965). Unlike the US film "Day After, The" (1983) (TV), the film gives detailed information as to what is happening on a scientific basis. You are shown how a worst-case scenario can happen, and what the effects are, as you follow the surviving members of the two families through the aftermath. The scenes of death, destruction and disease are so realistic, I had to shower after seeing this film for the first time. But what is most disturbing is that the film includes the long-term effects of global thermonuclear war, going into weeks, months, years, even decades. The film ends thirteen years after the nuclear attack, and the final frames of the film will burn into you like no other film ever will. There can be no question that this film MUST be re-released in the USA on DVD, so that it's message will be heard and felt.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn the aftermath of the nuclear blast, footage of a cat supposedly "suffocating" outside in the extreme heat is shown. This is actually footage of a cat enjoying a hefty dose of catnip, then they just reversed the film to give the impression of the cat suffocating (the way the cat is rolling on the ground is the giveaway).
- GaffesToward the end of the film, when Ruth falls over while she and her daughter are working the fields, you can hear the director say "Look up nice and slow" to the actors. It's even included in the current closed captioning, with the speaker attributed as "Man."
- Autres versionsIn the original broadcast version, the narration which opens the film is accompanied by a recording of Richard Strauss's "Alpine Symphony"; due to rights issues, the music was removed from most later home video releases. It was restored for Severin's Blu-ray release, as well as the UK Blu-ray release from Simply Media.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Secret Society: In Time of Crisis (1987)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 400 000 £ (estimation)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le soleil noir (1984) officially released in India in English?
Répondre