ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,5/10
1,1 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueLoosely based on the short story by Edgar Allan Poe, a witch is sent to death, only to try & return from the grave, seventeen years later, to possess her daughter's adult body.Loosely based on the short story by Edgar Allan Poe, a witch is sent to death, only to try & return from the grave, seventeen years later, to possess her daughter's adult body.Loosely based on the short story by Edgar Allan Poe, a witch is sent to death, only to try & return from the grave, seventeen years later, to possess her daughter's adult body.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Avis en vedette
This movie was a total farce. They used Edgar Allen Poe to get several young women out of their clothes. No different then your typical stupid slasher film. The only difference is that it is based off a short story by Edgar Allen Poe. Don't watch this movie
Breasts. That is kinda what this movie was about. It was tailor made for a latch-key kid in the 90s to stay up late watching HBO to eventually see breasts.
Breasts.
It delivered that.
There was some plot about an evil witch and breasts. Something about a love affair and breasts. There were a few deaths and breasts and...
...yes, there was a thong despite the fact it takes place a long time ago before there were thongs and...yes, breasts.
What you have here is really a movie about breasts, but, it is a period piece Lovecraftian movie about breasts.
So if you want breasts, this is the movie for you, especially since it really makes no effort whatsoever to pass itself off as anything but a movie about breasts.
Breasts. You really have to appreciate that honesty.
Breasts.
It delivered that.
There was some plot about an evil witch and breasts. Something about a love affair and breasts. There were a few deaths and breasts and...
...yes, there was a thong despite the fact it takes place a long time ago before there were thongs and...yes, breasts.
What you have here is really a movie about breasts, but, it is a period piece Lovecraftian movie about breasts.
So if you want breasts, this is the movie for you, especially since it really makes no effort whatsoever to pass itself off as anything but a movie about breasts.
Breasts. You really have to appreciate that honesty.
I hit puberty in the early 90s, so in other words, I was a horny and hormone-controlled teenager when "Baywatch" first aired on TV, and naturally had a crush on practically every babe that paraded through the screen in a skimpy red bathing suit. Pamela Anderson, evidently, but I was even far more enchanted by two other blond and typically nineties' beauties; - Erika Elaniak and Nicole Eggert. The latter was a cherubic and polished but nonetheless very sexy girl-next-door type. Whoever knew that, before her "Baywatch" period, Eggert had already appeared in a cheap and ultra-sleazy Roger Corman production loosely - VERY loosely - inspired by Edgar Allan Poe's writings? At the beginning of the film, Eggert depicts the fiercely foul-mouthed witch Lenora who gets executed in front of an angry town's mob and her powerlessly staring husband who's holding their few weeks' old baby in his arms. Nearly 18 years later, the baby matured into the gorgeous Nicole Eggert again. Morella is excited to celebrate her birthday and taste adulthood, but little does she know that the voluptuous nanny has been carefully preparing Lenora's reincarnation via the pure body and soul of her daughter.
Roger Corman knows Poe, trust me. He was single-handedly responsible for the absolute greatest Edgar Allan Poe film-adaptations during the early sixties, like "House of Usher", "The Masque of the Red Death", "Premature Burial", etc. If Corman really wanted to make an atmospheric, qualitative and genuinely frightening adaptation of Poe's short story, he certainly could have done so. Instead, he cleared just hired Jim Wynorski ("Chopping Mall", "Transylvania Twist") to direct a cheap but profitable B-movie with a focus on ravishing women, tacky horror, secondhand sets & scenery and boobs, boobs, boobs! 18-year-old Eggert still gets a stand-in for her nude sequences, but Corman regulars Lana Clarkson, Maria Ford and Gail Thackray showcase their bodily assets gratuitously and repeatedly. The sets and stock-footage, like the numerous lightening strikes, are shamelessly edited from much older flicks (you might recognize "The Terror" - 1963) and our producer would still continue to recycle them in later films like "The Haunting of Hell House" - 1999. "The Haunting of Morella" is nevertheless fun and amusing, at least if you don't mind the derivative plot and the dull moments in between the cheesy gore and the nudity.
Roger Corman knows Poe, trust me. He was single-handedly responsible for the absolute greatest Edgar Allan Poe film-adaptations during the early sixties, like "House of Usher", "The Masque of the Red Death", "Premature Burial", etc. If Corman really wanted to make an atmospheric, qualitative and genuinely frightening adaptation of Poe's short story, he certainly could have done so. Instead, he cleared just hired Jim Wynorski ("Chopping Mall", "Transylvania Twist") to direct a cheap but profitable B-movie with a focus on ravishing women, tacky horror, secondhand sets & scenery and boobs, boobs, boobs! 18-year-old Eggert still gets a stand-in for her nude sequences, but Corman regulars Lana Clarkson, Maria Ford and Gail Thackray showcase their bodily assets gratuitously and repeatedly. The sets and stock-footage, like the numerous lightening strikes, are shamelessly edited from much older flicks (you might recognize "The Terror" - 1963) and our producer would still continue to recycle them in later films like "The Haunting of Hell House" - 1999. "The Haunting of Morella" is nevertheless fun and amusing, at least if you don't mind the derivative plot and the dull moments in between the cheesy gore and the nudity.
Well, let's get this out of the way. BOOBS. Lots of BOOBS. As a woman, I am not personally impressed by boobs so trying to rely on that as a selling point for a film is just tacky to me. Now that's out of the way, I'll talk about the actual movie.
What I liked: *The setting. *The way it was shot. Some of the scenes were really shot beautifully. *The costumes were nice with the exception of a scene that shows underwear that doesn't suit the era. *The story.
What I didn't like: *Some of the acting was pretty bad. *The script was lousy but it may have come across lousy at times because the acting was so off. *The amount of boob-age.
This wasn't downright awful, to me but it left something to be desired. It really could've been so much more because there really is a story there. Maybe someone will take another stab at this one someday.
What I liked: *The setting. *The way it was shot. Some of the scenes were really shot beautifully. *The costumes were nice with the exception of a scene that shows underwear that doesn't suit the era. *The story.
What I didn't like: *Some of the acting was pretty bad. *The script was lousy but it may have come across lousy at times because the acting was so off. *The amount of boob-age.
This wasn't downright awful, to me but it left something to be desired. It really could've been so much more because there really is a story there. Maybe someone will take another stab at this one someday.
You could be mistaken that The Haunting of Morella was a Charles Band movie because it follows a very similar formula of his movies. The acting wasn't very good, often it sounds like they are reading their lines off the page. The movie itself was well directed and storyboarded.
It's not quite soft core porn but it wasn't far from it, very fleshy which really pushed the romance angle of the movie about as far as you can.
There was a bit of an Edgar Allen Poe spirit left in the story but again this movie would be more appreciated by the Band fans. Ultimately it was the script that lacked depth and continuously killed off any development of suspension of disbelief.
It's not quite soft core porn but it wasn't far from it, very fleshy which really pushed the romance angle of the movie about as far as you can.
There was a bit of an Edgar Allen Poe spirit left in the story but again this movie would be more appreciated by the Band fans. Ultimately it was the script that lacked depth and continuously killed off any development of suspension of disbelief.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDeborah Dutch said in an interview that it was freezing on set when she filmed her bath scene. When she got out of the tub for her death, they covered her entire body with fake blood. Then she had to lay on a cold cement floor in a pool of the blood for an hour while they filmed from different angles. She was shivering and her teeth were chattering, but she tried not to move or she'd ruin the shot. After they finished, she had to stand in the tub again while some of the guys on the crew rinsed blood off her with buckets of warm water because they didn't want her tracking the sticky goo across the studio. She joked that it was a good thing she wasn't shy at that point. Then she put on a robe and hurried to a shower where she stood in the warm water for a long, long time.
- GaffesAt 61 minutes when Diane appears at the pool, she is wearing the sort of skimpy underwear which would not have been available until well into the 20th century.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Katarina's Nightmare Theater: The Haunting of Morella (2015)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Haunting of Morella?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 1 547 867 $ US
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 1 547 867 $ US
- Durée1 heure 22 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Spanish language plot outline for L'Esprit Satanique de Morella (1990)?
Répondre