Du bei dao wang

Having never seen the sequel to The One-Armed Swordsman (1968), I was in for quite a shock. To put it simply, this is one of the best kung fu follow-ups I have ever seen. Knowing that the one-armed character is by this time firmly established (and a box office success), director Chang Cheh opts for full-blown action this time around. It is basically The Road Warrior (1981) to the first film's Mad Max (1979), pumping up the action quotient ten fold and rarely slowing down from beginning to end.

Sword fights come at you every five minutes or so, resulting in some amazingly bloody action. I had no idea that any kung fu film from the 60s was so bloody. This effect is remarkably enhanced by the use of palm squibs to send bloody flying and the heroes all white outfits. Another exciting aspect of the film (which would later become a Wang Yu staple) is the use of unorthodox weapons by the heavies. With eight super villains there is a lot of room for some creativity and Cheh and co. don't fail. My personal favorite is the sinister female demon that pulls any numbers of knives from under her flowing robe.

But it is not to say that the film abandons the dramatic aspects of the story. Cheh spends a decent amount of time focusing on Fang Gang's reflection of his violent ways, both past and present. Fang essentially wants to be left alone with his wife but, to employ an overused quote, every time he thinks he is out, they pull him back in. He is a complex character and it is good to his emotional complications played out on screen, especially after the final battle during a celebration. The relationship between Fang and his wife is also highlighted, with both Wang Yu and Chiao Chiao performing well.

A great sequel to the original film 1967 with the two main characters husband and wife reprise their role but went straight to the plot a against the eight dagger clan more action less drama more blood shedding and fight scene... it's already built up all the storyline in the first one... the second one is just smooth sailing onwards

Smooth transition from the original to the sequel... great antagonist and protagonist.

After defeating The Long-Armed Devil and his armies, our nubbed hero has been living in retirement as a farmer, but circumstances causes him to come out of retirement and take on The Eight Kings, each warrior with their own unique fighting style. The time has come for the one armed swordsman to return.

Before Chang Cheh was making his "Five Deadly Venoms" films, he was perfecting the wuxia with the One-Armed Swordsman series. Is part two better than the first? Maybe, maybe not. But it is at least as good, with some more solid villains -- including a woman with a thousand blades! The martial arts genre, at least under the direction of Chang Cheh, is interesting in how steady and consistent it remained -- even up through the 1980s, the use of scenery, camera tricks and more remained largely unchanged. But, as they say, if it ain't broke, why fix it?

I guess The One-Armed Swordsman (1967) must have done pretty well, because just two years later it got a sequel. One thing I've noticed about Shaw Brothers movies is that sequels are shockingly rare. The genre/action movies made in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s often got tons of sequels greenlit straight away (the Stray Cat Rock series had all five movies released in a window of less than 18 months, from memory), but Shaw Brothers in the Hong Kong scene seemed to have a different practice. They produced movies with similar premises often featuring a rotating cast of actors, but direct sequels themselves weren't too commonplace (maybe that's a natural consequence of having like half the movies end with the main character dying in an epic blaze of glory).

So as for this sequel to The One-Armed Swordsman? It's just okay. It benefits from being able to hit the ground running, but none of the beats it ends up hitting are all that amazing. It's just a serviceable martial arts movie, and in typical (and unfortunate) sequel fashion, it more or less does what the first movie does, but just in ways that are slightly less exciting. It's consistent in that regard... just consistently less exciting and entertaining, and I say that as someone who liked but didn't love the first movie.

But then again, an average Shaw Brothers martial arts movie is still better than an average anything else movie, because their standard of quality was generally so high throughout the late 1960s and into the 1980s. That makes Return of the One-Armed Swordsman a worthwhile watch for martial arts movie fanatics, but I don't think I'd recommend it to more casual action movie fans, in all honesty.

"The One-Armed Swordsman" is a classic and one of the best martial arts films of all time. So, it's not surprised that the movie had sequels. While not nearly as good, Yu Wang is back as the title character and it's interesting enough to merit watching if you like these sorts of pictures. If you don't, this one is unlikely to convert you.

When the film begins, a group of baddies named the 8 Kings attack the leaders and best students of the 40 martial arts schools. They then send an ultimatum to all the surviving students back home...."Cut off one of your arms or we'll kill your masters". Not surprisingly, they decide instead to seek out the One-Armed Swordsman and enlist his help. Will he come out of retirement to help? Well, considering the title of the film, it's pretty much a foregone conclusion.

Along the way, they encounter a lot of treachery and baddies. My favorite was the evil woman who smiles so convincingly...as she murders folks right and left. She is an amazingly good villain and it's a shame she's only in a small portion of the film. In addition to her, you'll see LOTS of blood and gore and tons of ridiculous fight scenes using 'wire fu'. This is the most serious problem of the movie. In the first film, there is some wire fu but mostly it's just really, really great swordsmanship and martial arts. Here, however, the quality of the fighting is much, much lower with blood substituting for quality fighting. Not a terrible fighting film but certainly not near the quality of the first one despite having the same leading man and director. Diverting but far from a must-see. After all, you DON'T expect total realism from a one-armed film...but you do expect better than this.

By the way, if you want to make this film a drinking game, I suggest everyone take a shot every time a character is mortally wounded yet miraculously, for a few seconds, begins fighting again despite losing gallons of blood or having HUGE swords thrust through them! I especially love the scene with the guy impaled with a sword and he manages to kill a dozen more guys for about the next five minutes before he ultimately expires!