Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.
- A remporté 2 prix Primetime Emmy
- 16 victoires et 105 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Bridgerton' is lauded for its stunning costumes, diverse cast, and captivating narratives, though some critique its historical inaccuracies and modern touches. The romantic plot and character arcs receive mixed feedback, with praise for drama and occasional complaints about depth. Julie Andrews' narration is a standout feature. Criticisms include divergence from the original work and authenticity issues. Despite these, many find the series visually appealing and enjoyable.
Avis en vedette
Can't understand the entertainment value Americans get out of bad scriptwriting for shows that take place in Europe. This is on par with Emily in Paris, complete crap and forgettable.
This is not a quality Jennifer Ehle/Colin Firth Pride and Prejudice type series, or downton abbey. This show is an exaggeration of those kinds of tales and it is pure fantasy, using the back drop of victorian english high society. Do not take it seriously and enjoy it for what it is. It really highlights the absurdity of that time period as well. I love the pride and prejudice series I mentioned above and to me this movie was like a guilty pleasure version of that kind of genre. Costumes are beautiful and they threw in some modern music played classically, so really, this show is not taking itself seriously as a period piece, and is clearly just having fun. Have fun with it and enjoy the eye candy.
Let me just start that I am a fan of the books so I am watching this as I did when I watched all the live actions of Pride and Prejudice, with eyes finally getting my wish of seeing my fave books come to life, and I was not disappointed. Is it a masterpiece? NOT AT ALL. Is it accurate to the books? Not so much but they did get the heart of it. There's a lot of issue I find with it but somehow I still find myself watching it because I love the genre.
To note: If you are into the ACCURATE retelling of history then I'm telling you right now SKIP THIS. This isn't about the accurate retelling of history. So if the "diversity" and "wokeness", the designs of their costumes, the way they acted takes you away from the story because of inaccuracy then you will have a bad time. This isn't a documentary. This isn't a biography. This isn't a true story.
Now first of, the books star different siblings so each season will focus on different Bridgerton with splice inserts of side stories. S1 is more steamy and shoves a more lustful play on their romance it's a fake love turned real love trope. S2 is a slow burn and might be boring for some as it is less steamy, it's an enemies to lovers trope.
Now. If you're into the book series do give this a try! Of course it wouldn't be 100% accurate but I did feel that it was very true in how romance book genre goes. It's like a whimsical romance. Glazed over. Or whatever term. Something like those Hallmark Christmas romance movies but with more mature scenes. Modern music made classical. They really brought to life the family dynamic of the Bridgertons. I love how they interact with one another as a family.
Finally. If you're just looking for a Pride and Prejudice or historical setting romance show then do give this a try! You might just like it.
To note: If you are into the ACCURATE retelling of history then I'm telling you right now SKIP THIS. This isn't about the accurate retelling of history. So if the "diversity" and "wokeness", the designs of their costumes, the way they acted takes you away from the story because of inaccuracy then you will have a bad time. This isn't a documentary. This isn't a biography. This isn't a true story.
Now first of, the books star different siblings so each season will focus on different Bridgerton with splice inserts of side stories. S1 is more steamy and shoves a more lustful play on their romance it's a fake love turned real love trope. S2 is a slow burn and might be boring for some as it is less steamy, it's an enemies to lovers trope.
Now. If you're into the book series do give this a try! Of course it wouldn't be 100% accurate but I did feel that it was very true in how romance book genre goes. It's like a whimsical romance. Glazed over. Or whatever term. Something like those Hallmark Christmas romance movies but with more mature scenes. Modern music made classical. They really brought to life the family dynamic of the Bridgertons. I love how they interact with one another as a family.
Finally. If you're just looking for a Pride and Prejudice or historical setting romance show then do give this a try! You might just like it.
The costumes, settings, music are all beautiful, but we've seen them before. This season lacks the substance and intrigue that led so many to bingewatch the first. A gaping hole is left with the resolution of Simon and Daphne's romance. The love triangle between Anthony, Kate and Edwina feels forced, with none of the actors particularly charismatic. The heightened focus on Eloise is detrimental, with the actress' eyerolls, overreaction, and unrealistic conduct reminiscent of Anna Chlumsky as Vivian in Inventing Anna. The other subplots are so redundant that they could have been crafted from film left on the editing floor in Season 1 and weren't enthralling on the first go-round (e.g., Penelope's unrequited infatuation with Colin).
My rating of 6 is the average of a 7 for Season 1 and a 5 for Season 2.
My rating of 6 is the average of a 7 for Season 1 and a 5 for Season 2.
Can we have the old showrunner back? Please.
There were only a handful of exciting episodes for season 3 and they didn't really make up for the others being so dull.
The plot structure they went for would have worked over at least 12 episodes instead of just 8. They clearly didn't want to give the romantic leads their time to shine which meant we didn't get time to fall in love with their love.
I think the assumption was that their friendship in was enough in previous seasons that we wouldn't need any time to buy their love. I need more time to see why after years they'd finally go for it. It was so awkward.
There were only a handful of exciting episodes for season 3 and they didn't really make up for the others being so dull.
The plot structure they went for would have worked over at least 12 episodes instead of just 8. They clearly didn't want to give the romantic leads their time to shine which meant we didn't get time to fall in love with their love.
I think the assumption was that their friendship in was enough in previous seasons that we wouldn't need any time to buy their love. I need more time to see why after years they'd finally go for it. It was so awkward.
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Check out our list of renewals and cancellations to see if your favorite show made the cut.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJonathan Bailey has prepared a manual on how to be a Bridgerton leading man or leading lady to pass on to his on-screen siblings for when it is their turn to be the focus of the show.
- Gaffes"Yellow line" road markings visible in several scenes, particularly early in Season 1 during filming around Royal Crescent in Bath. These line markings would not have been painted on until the 1950s, and serve to indicate that an area has limited or no parking facilities available.
- ConnexionsEdited into Colin, date cuenta (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Bridgerton have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Bridgerton
- Lieux de tournage
- Wilton House, Wilton, Salisbury, Wiltshire, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(The Duke of Hastings' house in London exterior and debutants in court interior scene, Clyvedon's dining room)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h(60 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant