Bernard Nathanson et Mildred Jefferson s'affrontent dans une bataille nationale qui a conduit à la cause judiciaire la plus célèbre et la plus controversée de l'histoire.Bernard Nathanson et Mildred Jefferson s'affrontent dans une bataille nationale qui a conduit à la cause judiciaire la plus célèbre et la plus controversée de l'histoire.Bernard Nathanson et Mildred Jefferson s'affrontent dans une bataille nationale qui a conduit à la cause judiciaire la plus célèbre et la plus controversée de l'histoire.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 17 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Avis en vedette
The entire narrative is built on not just outright lies but also by an array of has-been talent who clearly needed money. You don't need to even be well-versed in the decision to know when the movie's spewing nonsense.
In a similar manner to last year's Never Rarely Sometimes Always (except that film is extraordinary, Roe v. Wade is extraordinarily bad), it's inspired me to give back... to Planned Parenthood.
It's not just a bad movie, it's a bad movie filled with outright lies, misrepresentations and thinly-veiled political soap box speeches.
Unless you give them credit for having the names of the people involved correct, there's basically no truth to any of this, and if you're going to completely abandon reality, just make your own movie. Don't represent your utterly fiction as a docu-drama.
Also, these people actually WANTED to be associated with the likes of convicted felon Roger Stone and professional bully Milo Yianopolis. If that doesn't tell you all you need to know to pass on this, you should be ashamed of yourself.
- the appallingly amateurish directing
- the high school level writing
- the Youtube parody acting
or the number of alt-right reviewers falling over themselves in the reviews trying to make this pass for a masterpiece.
Look, pro-choice or pro-life, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when you try to pretend that a movie" which makes SNL parodies look like Scorcese movies, with nutjob conspiracy that makes Charlie Sheen sound sane and reasonable, is the best thing ever, you just embarrass yourself.
I have seen more convincing pro-life arguments from FOX News, and that's saying a lot.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesNumerous cast and crew were said to have quit the film after finding out about its strong anti-abortion message.
- GaffesThe film's epilogue states Planned Parenthood made $1.6 billion from abortions in 2018. According to their 501(c)(3) status report, of their $1.64 billion in income, $1.57 billion went to operating expenses. Additionally, abortion only represented 3% of their income, with the remaining 97% coming from STI treatments, contraception and cancer screenings.
- Citations
Dr. Bernard Nathanson: I didn't know what to say. I felt I was caught in a lie. So you have to understand, it was the 70's. The women's liberation movement was exploding. Millions of women were taking to the streets and I got swept up in the wake.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The Cinema Snob: Roe v. Wade (2021)
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Roe v. Wade?Propulsé par Alexa
- How long is the movie?
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El grito silencioso. El caso Roe V. Wade
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 23 561 $ US
- Durée1 heure 52 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1