Histoires sensuelles

Four very different directors explore four very different shades of lust in Lust Stories, though the common ground in each is the theme of female desire, as it attempts to cut through the strait-jackets of morality, patriarchy and class.

The anthology begins with Anurag Kashyap's film, where in the very first scene, the protagonist Kalindi (Radhika Apte) is leaning out of a cab window, as it zips down the road. She's carefree, liberated, and en-route to a one-night-stand. Next to her is the visibly younger and visibly nervous Tejas (Akash Thosar). Once they're in his room, he tries to keep up with her - intellectually and sexually - as she mocks his Chetan Bhagat book collection and teases him about his lack of sexual experience. She doesn't just take charge in bed, but also his virginity.

Hereon the power dynamic between them gets murkier, as Akash happens to be Kalindi's student. Kalindi - the one ostensibly in power and often abusing it - also often seems to be the one without it, with both Tejas and her 12-years-older husband Mihir, who is encouraging her to "explore her sexuality". Radhika brings out this dichotomy of her character flawlessly, and Akash matches her performance perfectly as the clueless Tejas, who has no choice but to go along on this ride.

Zoya Akhtar's film opens with Sudha (Bhumi Pednekar) and Ajit (Neil Bhoopalam) in the throes of passion. Their intimacy devolves immediately after, when Sudha drops down on her knees to maaro pauncha. It's like the chasm of class between them splits wide open the second they are clothed, and she's revealed to be his maid. The divide gets starker still, when Ajit's parents drop into his bachelor pad to fix his rishta, or when she's asked to prepare tea for his prospective in-laws and fiancee.

It isn't so much the characters, as the choreography of Zoya Akhtar's scenes that do the talking. The family members crammed in the drawing room, shifting seats, lifting up their feet as Sudha sweeps the floor. The sounds of Ajit's father in the bathroom, flushing the pot, as Sudha irons their clothes in the room next to it. Sudha-Ajit's a sexual intimacy may seem almost deviant in a society such as theirs, yet there's a daily intimacy that plays out between the family and their domestic help, that's barely acknowledged, except in the form of gifts such as leftover mithais and slightly-ripped-kurtas. When the characters do speak, they only ever seem to indulge in small talk, be it Ajit's parents and their prospective in-laws' mind-numbing conversation on the difference between their Diwali celebrations, or even the maid-next-door gossiping with Sudha about the woman she works for. The banality of the topics seem to masquerade as normality, and the only thing that pierces through these layers of hypocrisy is Sudha's desire. Be it the acting, directing, sets or sound - this is a film that says a lot, without saying much at all.

"Kaisi lag rahi hoon?" Reena (Manisha Koirala) asks Sudhir (Jaideep Ahlawat), as she emerges from the waves in a swimsuit, in the first scene of Dibakar Banerjee's film. "Do bachchon ki maa," replies Sudhir, setting the tone for the story ahead.

Reena is married to Sudhir's best friend Salman (Sanjay Kapoor), and the two have been having an affair behind the latter's back for the past three years. Some of this has to do with the fact that Reena's identity seems to have dwindled down to "do bacchon ki maa" over the years. Or teen bachche, if you count Salman ("You want a mother, not a wife," she chides him at one point). Yet, her affair barely lets her escape from that identity either. When she suggests to Sudhir at one point, that they tell Salman about them, he asks her, "what about the children?". "Why does everyone bring up my children, when I am talking about my happiness?" she retorts.

The awkward dynamics between the trio play out at Sudhir's beach house, when they are forced to confront (or may be not) the crossroads each of them are at. All three actors have given complex, layered performances - Sanjay Kapoor, as the husband who can't see beyond Reena as the "wife, mother, hostess" package, and him as the providor of her "allowances"; Manisha as the fed-up, and now conscience-less wife, who has no qualms about playing the two friends against each other; and Jaideep, a jaded lover and dubious best friend, who's only interested in maintaining status quo.

Karan Johar doesn't let go of any of his Karan Johar-isms in his film, be it the elaborate costumes, music or even a wedding sequence. The story - that revolves around Megha (Kiara Advani) a newlywed who has to come to terms with fact that her husband is a major disappointment in bed - is an exploration of female desire, and how it is stifled, policed, controlled or ignored. Subtle isn't KJo's forte, and so, the film often ends up carrying a public service announcement-type quality. What works is the acting. Kiara Advani, who plays Megha - the bahu-next-door seeking sexual satisfaction, balances the OTT script and settings with a performance that is just-right. Vicky Kaushal is endearing as Paras, the fumbling husband-lover. Neha Dhupia impresses too, as the risque-blouse-wearing divorcee who likes to pleasure herself in libraries and encourages Kiara to explore her sexuality. Much ado has been made about the Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham 'climax' sequence, which is, well, amusing and self aware. Still, the film sticks out more than it fits in with anthology.

All the stories are based on a certain issues, which if one is aware of or has experienced would make it an enjoyable movie. Apart from Karan Johar one, others were difficult to comprehend as in what is happening, why are they behaving in that manner. I guess the runtime for each story was very small to establish anything in detail. In order of liking,

1. Zoya Akhtar: It seems she has taken upon herself to show poor people stories after being accused of having made movies about the rich. She does a fantastic job and the potrayal, dialogues felt authentic. Bhumi Pednekar outshines everyone across all stories. She just has 2 dialogues and the entire story hinges on her. Exceptional performance in a completely deglamourised role. Speaking of the direction, I thoroughly enjoyed the match cuts and how the story was established.

2. Karan Johar, this one is the comedy and easy to understand, watch this for sure. I felt one could have made an entire movie on this, but this one is made for the one comedic climax it felt nevertheless the climax was funny.

3. Dibakar Banerjee, I didn't get this one, a conflicted middle-aged woman it seemed, but I was left with more questions, which is may be a good thing, I don't know.

4. Anurag Kashyap, a conflicted teacher figuring out about love. I kind of understood the message being wanting everything, but without any logic about if it is morally right or wrong. It is entirely about dilemma may be best suited for people who have gone through this patch. I got bored few minutes into this and was waiting for it get over.

I watched this series with a lot of hope. But it falls flat on it's face. Either the filmmakers slept walked through the making or tried too hard. Apart from Karan Johar's movie, the rest delivers almost nothing. Anurag Kashyap's movie tries to ask a few important questions about love and existence. Yet it fails to make an impact.

Joya Akhtar and Banerjee fails to impress. It's Karan Johar who makes it watchable and puts across question of female desire and pleasure. Something not seen in popular media.

You can watch it once. But not something you will ever come back to.

This movie successfully explores the regressive Indian sexuality and especially women's sexuality. The first part direced by Anurag Kashyap was really commendable with terrific performance by Radhika Apte. The second part directed by Zoya Akhtar was just okay. I loved seeing Manisha Koirala after a long time with a powerful role. The best part although was Karan Johar's which was hilarious and at the time had a beautiful message which is also my title for the review. One scene from the movie reminded me of a similar scene in Veere di wedding which was pathbreaking. 1st part- 4 stars 2nd part- 3 stars 3rd part- 3.5 stars 4th part- 4.5 stars

Heard a lot about it early this summer and today I finally decided to watch it. So here is my review. It has four individual stories of women are involved or want to be involved in a relationship and we are shown how and what they feel as their stories unfold.

From a technical standpoint, all the four stories have great amount of work involved. The character development is very good, the art and sound are just right. There are small and healthy doses of humor added which is enjoyable. The choice of actors for the roles is appropriate and each of them have played the roles perfectly.

From a deeper perspective, although it is intended to be for matured and highly educated audience who are possibly upper middle class and from high society, this film is hollow in that none of the stories narrated have a moral/lesson. They are worth watching once but not that worthy to come back for more. I was sitting pondering how each story was connected, was there a hidden secret, a deep rooted meaning or an easter egg for me to think about. Sadly (it may be only me), I couldn't find any. When one story ends, I felt I learned nothing from it except the third one with some really good storyline. Except for being good looking visual art pieces nothing is really conveyed that the audience can go back to.

Maybe it was intended for that. A good coffee movie about relationships for women and matured audiences can watch once and go about their lives again. Maybe they were designed such that we could find a character which we could identify with and see our feelings through them. Or just like reading a book of short relationship stories. I don't know.