ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,3/10
27 k
MA NOTE
Face aux manigances suspectes de la ferme voisine, une bande de poulets intrépides se fédère pour se protéger d'une nouvelle et inquiétante menace.Face aux manigances suspectes de la ferme voisine, une bande de poulets intrépides se fédère pour se protéger d'une nouvelle et inquiétante menace.Face aux manigances suspectes de la ferme voisine, une bande de poulets intrépides se fédère pour se protéger d'une nouvelle et inquiétante menace.
- Nominé pour le prix 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 victoire et 9 nominations au total
Thandiwe Newton
- Ginger
- (voice)
Zachary Levi
- Rocky
- (voice)
Bella Ramsey
- Molly
- (voice)
Imelda Staunton
- Bunty
- (voice)
Lynn Ferguson
- Mac
- (voice)
David Bradley
- Fowler
- (voice)
Jane Horrocks
- Babs
- (voice)
Romesh Ranganathan
- Nick
- (voice)
Daniel Mays
- Fetcher
- (voice)
Josie Sedgwick-Davies
- Frizzle
- (voice)
Nick Mohammed
- Dr. Fry
- (voice)
Julia Sawalha
- Ginger
- (voice)
- …
David Brooks
- Burly Guard
- (voice)
Dan Williamson
- Van Driver
- (voice)
Tom Doggart
- 2D Narrator
- (voice)
- …
Sam Fell
- 2D Animated Boy
- (voice)
- …
Avis en vedette
Not as good as the first one as the setting is a lot more fantastical and silly, but it still has the Aardman charm and style with goofy looking characters and inventive contraptions. The plot clearly shows its inspiration from classic films and whilst being a bit too long, it has lots of humour, jokes and wacky adventures to keep it entertaining. The different voice actors aren't as good and the modern pop song at the start felt out of place, but the animation is great (if less hand-made) and full of vibrant colours and it has those little touches which make it something special.
Overall score = 7/10.
Overall score = 7/10.
Say what you want about the man but Mel Gibson is sorely missed, that was one of many mistakes this movie made. Flat, boring, pretty, but not fun. The original stands as a childhood favorite that I've watched with my kid many times but nugget of whatever, will be forgotten in a week. Yet another in a long list of agenda filled Netflix blunders. When will they learn? (Side note about Netflix as a production company: finally canceling my subscription after ANOTHER price hike, removing Christmas movies around the holidays, while other services put them behind pay walls is just a greedy, disgusting practice imo, streaming is out of control and people are finding alternatives)
After watching this movie during the day on Christmas Eve with my Mum, Dad and my brother Jordy for lunch here's my spoiler-free review of Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget! As usual, I'll be talking about my thoughts, my favourite moments & comparing the other Aardman shorts and my conclusion/rating! After the 2000s original Chicken Run, we finally have a sequel all of it was claymation but there was one that wasn't! A lot of cast members from the original did not return some were recast but the voice cast that did come back were Jane Horrocks as Babs, Imelda Staunton as Bunty, Lynn Ferguson as Mac & a surprise return was Miranda Richardson as Mrs Tweedy! I waited this long to write my review so I can be honest about it earlier in 2023 I wrote a spoiler-free review for Star Wars: Visions Vol. II Episode IV: I Am Your Mother which I enjoyed very much! Comparing this to Star Wars, Early Man, Shaun the Sheep and Wallace & Gromit (which is finally getting a new film after we lost Peter Sallis back in 2017 6 years ago) it's not as good as the previous instalment! Overall I'm sure kids will enjoy this and I look forward to seeing what Aardman does next! That's why I gave this a 6/10! Go check out the other mini-movies while you wait for more & I'm certain that you, your kids and the whole family will be entertained by them! ;-)
The film was amusing enough (lots of slapstick humour) and I enjoyed the fun details in the animations, e.g. A hot air balloon disguised as a cloud, and the factory "eye register" including a night-shift worker with very bloodshot eyes..
That being said, the storyline felt unoriginal and became flat halfway through; it was too obvious what was going to happen. Chat GPT could have written it - and given many industries' overreliance on AI, it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case.
I also have to agree with some other reviewers that the personality of main characters was watered down, especially Rocky. The original Rocky's bragging bravado was a big driving force and source of parody in the first film. The sequel's endless slapstick humour and flat characters didn't do enough for me.
That being said, the storyline felt unoriginal and became flat halfway through; it was too obvious what was going to happen. Chat GPT could have written it - and given many industries' overreliance on AI, it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case.
I also have to agree with some other reviewers that the personality of main characters was watered down, especially Rocky. The original Rocky's bragging bravado was a big driving force and source of parody in the first film. The sequel's endless slapstick humour and flat characters didn't do enough for me.
Aardman Animations, personally, is a hit or miss for me as in the past, they have created some great works like Wallace & Gromit, Shaun the Sheep and so forth. But at the same time, they have made some pretty mediocre or pretty bad works too. "Chicken Run" is one of my favorite stop-motion movies as I really like the characters, the animation, and the narrative. With this sequel coming out after many years, it was entertaining but it was a bit underwhelming.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIf viewed closely during the film's final shot, an imposter chicken in the form of the nefarious penguin Feathers McGraw from the second Wallace & Gromit short, "Wrong Trousers," can be seen.
- GaffesDespite being remarried, Melisha still goes by the name 'Mrs Tweedy'. As made clear in the first film, this is her married name that she got from her previous husband as opposed to being a maiden name. However, some women keep their previous surname when they marry or re-marry.
- Générique farfeluThere is an image of two chickens in collars with happy faces riding a sky glider behind the duration of the credits until the "Songs" section where it fades to black.
- ConnexionsFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Ginger Snapped (2020)
- Bandes originalesMy Sweet Baby
Written by Josh Crocker, John Crocker and Charlotte Jane
Produced by Josh Crocker
Paloma Faith appears courtesy of RCA Records/Sony Music UK
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 38 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What was the official certification given to Poulets en fuite : L'aube de la pépite (2023) in India?
Répondre