ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,6/10
2,4 k
MA NOTE
Deux escrocs s'affrontent avec créativité et cruauté pour tenter d'embobiner une gagnante du loto à bord d'un navire de croisière en route pour le Mexique.Deux escrocs s'affrontent avec créativité et cruauté pour tenter d'embobiner une gagnante du loto à bord d'un navire de croisière en route pour le Mexique.Deux escrocs s'affrontent avec créativité et cruauté pour tenter d'embobiner une gagnante du loto à bord d'un navire de croisière en route pour le Mexique.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Rodrigo de la Serna
- Clayderman
- (as Rodrigo De la Serna)
Avis en vedette
Shenanigans on a sea cruise. Lucas and clayderman have always agreed to hustle and steal on different ships. But when they end up on the same ship, their plans clash. And crash into each other. Clayderman fears that lucas has come to steal his wife verónica. But apparently, they are both trying to scam one of the passengers who has recently won the lottery. It's pretty silly, but there are some twists and turns, some funny bits. From spain. I fear some of the humor was lost in translation. The sound has been dubbed into english, but occasionally, the subtitles don't quite match what the speakers are saying, in the dubbed version. It's fun, if you don't take it too seriously. Directed by daniel monzón.
It's a breezy, light-hearted film although it manages to sneak in its message.
It's a joy watching Luis Tosar and Rodrigo Dela Serna do their thing as engaging thespians. But Joan Pera as Antonio steals the show. He delivers on his role as a lucky lottery winner who's burdened by it.
Don't expect a thrilling voyage, and you'll be entertained and, at the same time, visit vicariously interesting places.
It's a joy watching Luis Tosar and Rodrigo Dela Serna do their thing as engaging thespians. But Joan Pera as Antonio steals the show. He delivers on his role as a lucky lottery winner who's burdened by it.
Don't expect a thrilling voyage, and you'll be entertained and, at the same time, visit vicariously interesting places.
Although the question I really have: how did they get the bunnies to sit so still in that one scene? And I didn't spot a contunuity error either - I know strange, right? But maybe and very likely you don't care about that (sorry for the short outburst). You do care about the movie and how good it may be though. The comedy factor is ok, but overall this is quite predictable.
Even the ending, which makes you wonder why ... well there is an explanation why he would fall for it, although he spotted a different set up earlier, but is it enough? Also do you really care? Don't get me wrong the characters are overall quite likeable, but also quite forgettable. While this isn't bad and some of the jokes do work, it also isn't a top notch movie either ... it's decent
Even the ending, which makes you wonder why ... well there is an explanation why he would fall for it, although he spotted a different set up earlier, but is it enough? Also do you really care? Don't get me wrong the characters are overall quite likeable, but also quite forgettable. While this isn't bad and some of the jokes do work, it also isn't a top notch movie either ... it's decent
Aboard a cruise; a group of scammers are trying to make their living on the unsuspecting travelers. The movie is basically the competition between then to catch a big fish; a lottery winner with 161M travelling with his family.
The movie combines a very healthy and classy humor (only one scene indulges with bathroom humor); a lot of smart ideas and unexpected twist. A great homage 1960s picaresque comedies.
Production values are very high for a Spanish production. Perfectly staged action scenes and musical numbers.
Aside from the language; it technically as good as any Hollywood production but with a far better and smart script and without Hollywood cliches. Both male protagonists are criminals; and the movie does not try to moralize them In fact the just perfect final joke at end; defines the moral ground of the story.
None of the above is surprising considering Daniel Monzon curriculum. A director capable of doing excellent thrillers and also comedies.
The only small criticism to YUCATAN; is that some trimming could had benefit it. Cutting some overacting from Rodrigo de la Serna and perhaps shorter some unnecessary musical numbers or dramatic situations.
In brief; as comedies went in 2018; this is by far the best and classiest
The movie combines a very healthy and classy humor (only one scene indulges with bathroom humor); a lot of smart ideas and unexpected twist. A great homage 1960s picaresque comedies.
Production values are very high for a Spanish production. Perfectly staged action scenes and musical numbers.
Aside from the language; it technically as good as any Hollywood production but with a far better and smart script and without Hollywood cliches. Both male protagonists are criminals; and the movie does not try to moralize them In fact the just perfect final joke at end; defines the moral ground of the story.
None of the above is surprising considering Daniel Monzon curriculum. A director capable of doing excellent thrillers and also comedies.
The only small criticism to YUCATAN; is that some trimming could had benefit it. Cutting some overacting from Rodrigo de la Serna and perhaps shorter some unnecessary musical numbers or dramatic situations.
In brief; as comedies went in 2018; this is by far the best and classiest
Good the series of Spanish accents that can be heard during the movie, but the movie plot is kind of foolish, They did not take advantage of the landscapes and photography opportunities. the musical scenes are pointless, unnecessary and long, is evident that there was a need to include a hot girl despite her lack of singing skills.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesStephanie Cayo's debut.
- Bandes originalesMe cago en el amor
Performed by Luis Tosar
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Yucatan?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 5 922 726 $ US
- Durée2 heures 9 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant