Kathryn Voss, seule survivante d'une mission spatiale désastreuse, cherche à retrouver sa fille en phase terminale, mais elle devient fugitive quand le gouvernement découvre qu'elle est reve... Tout lireKathryn Voss, seule survivante d'une mission spatiale désastreuse, cherche à retrouver sa fille en phase terminale, mais elle devient fugitive quand le gouvernement découvre qu'elle est revenue sur terre avec un cadeau extraordinaire.Kathryn Voss, seule survivante d'une mission spatiale désastreuse, cherche à retrouver sa fille en phase terminale, mais elle devient fugitive quand le gouvernement découvre qu'elle est revenue sur terre avec un cadeau extraordinaire.
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Karen L Charlton
- Oracle
- (as Karen Charlton)
Angelic Granger
- Shan
- (as Angel Granger)
Nichole LeShawn
- Nurse Bianca
- (as Nichole Le Shawn)
Jay D. Henderson
- Geoff Taylor
- (as Jay Henderson)
Avis en vedette
Don't believe the ratings on IMDb until they have had a few weeks to get the REAL ones. The bad movies in particular, routinely have fake reviewers, most likely involved in the movie making somehow. This movie was not good. Another horrible audio score that is incessant, and overbearing....too loud, and never ending. The acting was not natural...half the dialogue was forced...like the actors didn't remember how to be human once they got in front of the camera. Other than that, it's a good story, just not very well presented. I have always hated when a really good story gets ruined by bad film makers.
The three stars is generous.
The three stars is generous.
Begin (15 minutes) is OK , even if actors' acting comes straight from B movie type. Then it gets a bit chaotic and certainly not any better acting wise. Semi technology. Would be "interesting" actors talking science stuff that is all very obvious fake, so called technology. For me a waste of time.
You cannot blame the writer for the movie being bad, but she contributed by writing a story that needed clarification at every step. Even the ending left the feeling that you wanted to read the original story because nothing was explained or resolved. Artsy films can leave you with different interpretation at the end but in this case it left without any interpretation. OK so much for the pretentious story but the director did not get any good acting from the actors
.i guess they were as much in the dark as we were on where this movie was going. Some movies can do a lot with little budget but this movie did not even bother to conceal that it was working on a low budget; the creepy government figures using cell phones to discuss top secret info. The super secure facility that looked like a common office building, the shoddy camera angles
.it all distracted from what was supposed to be a serious movie with a message from the stars. I tried to like the movie
I really did but the holes in the story, the poor acting and the low budget was too much to overlook.
Horrible film, how many people got paid in order to get high score??! Acting is really.. really.. horrible!!, unpleasant to see the actors,(Gene Farber.. OK), but specially the two main characters, Pooja Batra and Michael Keeley,this two actors i am 100% sure, they were on drugs the entire film! The director did a bad job, camera work a shame, writer? i don't think this even had a script.. Don't waste your time on this! It's like some friends on a Friday night, after a big drugs and alcohol party said: "What to do now? .. lets take the phone camera and do some movie until our hangover pass away!" Remember: Say no to drugs.. otherwise you would believe you are doing a good film and in real life its just big crap!
This movie is so horribly produced, I don't even know where to begin. For starters, the cinematography looks like it was shot with an Iphone or 90's VHS camcorder. Poor composition and sound plague the movie from the start and it only gets worse. It is especially evident that little effort was expended on the production when the mic boom bobs into the lower portion of the frame during the scene where she initially wakes up in quarantine following her 'mysterious' survival of the spacecraft's return to Earth. As for the acting, it couldn't have been more unconvincing and disingenuous if the producers had picked random people off the street to portray the characters. In addition to the technical faults of this film, the story line and 'science' elements are poorly considered and show a complete lack of understanding of the actual science they are trying to convey. Overall, this 'film' is 1 hour and 41 minutes of mind-numbing absurdity. Unless you have 2 hours of your life that you would like to just toss away, don't waste your time on this atrocity. If I could give it a zero, I would.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesDuring the first interview with Kathryn Voss, a boom mic is visible at the bottom of the screen.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is One Under the Sun?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Едины под Солнцем
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 41m(101 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant