Dans les années 1630, la magie noire et les forces de la sorcellerie s'acharne sur une famille de La Nouvelle-Angleterre.Dans les années 1630, la magie noire et les forces de la sorcellerie s'acharne sur une famille de La Nouvelle-Angleterre.Dans les années 1630, la magie noire et les forces de la sorcellerie s'acharne sur une famille de La Nouvelle-Angleterre.
- Prix
- 43 victoires et 72 nominations au total
- Black Phillip
- (as Wahab Chaudhry)
- Lead Coven Witch
- (as Vivien Moore)
Avis en vedette
It's hard for an audience of this day and age to get into a period piece set in the 17th century without any big name actors or action elements. And I have to admit that I wasn't sure I wanted to see a film like this, especially with its horror elements. But my eyes were pealed from beginning to end. I wouldn't say anything about the story shocked me or had me confused, but the imagery, score, and uncompromising nature to Robert Egger's direction left me breathless. Within 10 minutes I was looking at the screen and whispering to myself "why would you go there?", "Don't do that!", or "come on, really?". Not because I thought it was poor story- telling, but because I was so invested as to what these characters were doing.
With that said, I don't think this film is for everyone. It's brutal, harshly relentless, and utterly disturbing. The characters use all 17th century dialogue and the cinematography sets this grey and ominous tone. The imagery from beginning to end will stick in your head as it has done with me. But that's the way horror films should be. I wouldn't say it's more a psychological thriller because there are plenty of terrifying moments, but it is more for the 'Under the Skin' crowd than it is for people who love 'The Conjuring'. Even in its harsh moments, I was always invested and I can't deny the quality of the writing, directing, and acting all around. This is how you make a horror film.
+Terrifying imagery
+Egger's direction
+Invested from beginning to end
-Sometimes the dialogue is difficult to follow
7.6/10
The movies has a slow pace but its still intense. And it will only feel intense if you give in and not wait for action and speed. This movie is no Hollywood spectacle.
The movie feels like a depiction of real life. No stupid jokes and exaggerated action scenes. Slow and calm dialogues. I liked the way the witch was enacted too. I am happy to see that she is not shown as a crazy woman jumping around eating toads.
On the other side, I wished there would have been a deeper insight into the witches thoughts.
So... go and see if you want more than silly Hollywood witches.
The characters are a very believable, ordinary family, with the sorts of tensions and problems you'd expect from people living a hard and substantially isolated life after being exiled from the local colonial town. They also have period Calvinist attitudes, and the storytelling doesn't present an outsider's view of this or offer a modern commentary, but instead it just displays these attitudes and tells a story from the characters' standpoint.
Their reliance on period folklore means that it doesn't strictly follow modern horror movie tropes, either. It has the slow build of a modern psychological horror/thriller as well as the standard formula where tragedies start from tragic flaws, but the traditions it's drawing on depend on a Calvinist's conception of flaws, and treat witchcraft as a horrible, well-understood occurrence rather than a shocking supernatural surprise. This story applies these perspectives.
It's very well done in terms of writing, acting, and other aspects of execution, so it might have cross-over appeal to fans of horror, folklore, or straight period drama from colonial America.
Very watchable.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe spelling of the title "The VVitch" is how the word was written in the story's period because the letter "W" was not yet in common use at the time.
- GaffesOne mistake in the dialogue is the incorrect usage of the personal pronouns "Thou" and "You." During the 17th century, "You" was reserved for formal situations, and when one was addressing someone of higher status/rank. "Thou," on the other hand, was used in personal/informal settings and between peers and close relations (similar to the French Tu vs. Vous). Throughout the film, the characters use thou and you interchangeably; however, a close-knit family such as theirs would not have likely addressed each other with the formal "You."
- Citations
Thomasin: Black Phillip, I conjure thee to speak to me. Speak as thou dost speak to Jonas and Mercy. Dost thou understand my English tongue? Answer me.
Black Phillip: What dost thou want?
Thomasin: What canst thou give?
Black Phillip: Wouldst thou like the taste of butter? A pretty dress? Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?
Thomasin: Yes.
Black Phillip: Wouldst thou like to see the world?
Thomasin: What will you from me?
Black Phillip: Dost thou see a book before thee?... Remove thy shift.
Thomasin: I cannot write my name.
Black Phillip: I will guide thy hand.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Film '72: Episode #45.3 (2016)
Meilleurs choix
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Witch
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 4 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 25 138 705 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 8 800 230 $ US
- 21 févr. 2016
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 40 423 945 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1