russelldresearch
nov 2017 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones93
Clasificación de russelldresearch
Reseñas38
Clasificación de russelldresearch
Reading some of the reviews by people who highly rated this movie, I could conclude only that they came from people who grew up on Harry Potter books and movies, because this is a very poor ghost story and even weaker horror movie. I tried to suspend my overriding feeling that Harry Potter had grown up to become an estate agent (US: real estate guy), but it was hard to shake because Radcliffe is so typecast by being the main actor in the ELEVEN movies based on J K Rowling's novels about a school where kids learn magic.
The movie had good production values, but the haunted house is the best thing in it. I couldn't rate it higher than 5/10, because the script is predictable, the dialogue is cliched, and the acting is middling - except for Radcliffe, who drags it down to amateur level. His displays of emotion are often inappropriate for the scene - he doesn't look scared when he should but does look scared when he shouldn't. He often seems too stiff and flat to be credible, and he needs to learn to relax his arms so we aren't feeling his internal tension about performing. OK, he was just in his early twenties when he made this movie, but I haven't seen an improved performance in any of his latest movies either.
Radcliffe is not as annoying as a Hollywood nepo baby, but neither is he far away from such a status, either. I'm not sure if another actor could have rescued this mess of a movie, but Radcliffe clearly couldn't. Maybe if he makes it up with J K Rowling, he can appear in the twelth Harry Potter movie: Harry Potter and the Deathly Acting.
The movie had good production values, but the haunted house is the best thing in it. I couldn't rate it higher than 5/10, because the script is predictable, the dialogue is cliched, and the acting is middling - except for Radcliffe, who drags it down to amateur level. His displays of emotion are often inappropriate for the scene - he doesn't look scared when he should but does look scared when he shouldn't. He often seems too stiff and flat to be credible, and he needs to learn to relax his arms so we aren't feeling his internal tension about performing. OK, he was just in his early twenties when he made this movie, but I haven't seen an improved performance in any of his latest movies either.
Radcliffe is not as annoying as a Hollywood nepo baby, but neither is he far away from such a status, either. I'm not sure if another actor could have rescued this mess of a movie, but Radcliffe clearly couldn't. Maybe if he makes it up with J K Rowling, he can appear in the twelth Harry Potter movie: Harry Potter and the Deathly Acting.
